uruknet.info
  اوروكنت.إنفو
     
    informazione dal medio oriente
    information from middle east
    المعلومات من الشرق الأوسط

[ home page] | [ tutte le notizie/all news ] | [ download banner] | [ ultimo aggiornamento/last update 01/01/1970 01:00 ] 10386


english italiano

  [ Subscribe our newsletter!   -   Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter! ]  



The Mystery Of The Second Sgrena Video


...Was the video from the kidnappers and if so could their claims possibly be true? Or were the insurgents trying to exculpate themselves in the eyes of the world's Muslims from all the horrible violence by blaming their enemy? If it was true why go public with this now? The timing seems suspicious. Italian Muslims quickly verified the Quranic passage cited by the insugents but the Quran is hardly a secret document, what does the accuracy of the reference prove? And if the video wasn't produced by the Kidnappers, who did make it? And why aren't the kidnappers refuting it?...


[10386]



Uruknet on Alexa


End Gaza Siege
End Gaza Siege

>

:: Segnala Uruknet agli amici. Clicka qui.
:: Invite your friends to Uruknet. Click here.




:: Segnalaci un articolo
:: Tell us of an article






The Mystery Of The Second Sgrena Video

Dave Fryett, Countercurrents.org


12 March, 2005


Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi delivered a brief speech to the Italian Senate on the kidnapping of Giuliana Sgrena and the shooting which occasioned her release. It was the first public pronouncement the Italian leader made since the attack by American soldiers which left a high-ranking Italian intelligence officer dead and two others wounded. His remarks were long on outrage and regret and short on much anticipated specifics. He did address some of the rumors which surround the incident dismissing the worst and assuring the people of Italy that the joint Italian/American investigation would be exhaustive and its findings would "clear everything up." Berlusconi did however drop one bomb: No ransom was paid for the release of Giuliana Sgrena.

In doing so Berlusconi cast himself in the heroic light of pugnacious defiance of the bloodthirsty, terrorist kidnappers and their unsavory demands. Images of early Soviet paintings and sculptures of Lenin came to mind as I listened to the Prime Minister laud his own efforts in the nationally broadcast speech. However, the revelation of this fact came only after the "leaking" of contradictory information and the publishing of startling accusations made on an unauthenticated video tape purportedly from Sgrena's kidnappers.

After a month of intense negotiations with the kidnappers by National Security Agent Nicola Calipari, slain in the attack, the Italian government announced that it had reached an agreement with the insurgents and had secured Sgrena's release. At this point a video of Giuliana Sgrena prepared the night before her hand-over was made by the kidnappers. In it she is seated at a table and standing behind her are hooded insurgents who read their statement announcing her release. Sgrena makes a statement saying that she has been treated well and thanks her well-wishers back home for their support. She then promises her loved-ones big hugs when she returned home.

Contemporaneously, a figure of $1,000,000 is leaked to the press as the ransom ammount. The number circulates for a day or two before Sgrena's release with not a word of protest coming from Berlusconi's government. The figure and its payment are debated around Italy with most Italians being supportive of the move because it secured the release of a beloved journalist and, undoubtedly, because it was seen as an act of defiance against American interests in this war which has never been popular with rank and file Italians.

Then comes the disputed events surrounding the shooting of Giuliana Sgrena and her co-passengers as they were on their way to the airport in Baghdad. The American and Italian governments and their loyal servants and their respective national media are currently trying to reconcile the conflicting accounts of the participants, such is the specious nature of the discussion today, but the truth of what happened there is not relevant to this discussion. It is what happened immediately thereafter which provides background to Berlusconi's uncharacteristically frank admission and his desire to recast the journalist's release in a different light.

As reported by the Roman daily, La Repubblica
(http://www.repubblica.it/2005/c/sezioni/cronaca/caliparifune/videri
sca/viderisca.html),
a second video emerged after the shooting. It was sent to the paper and it purports to be from the kidnappers and is a second part to the video made with Giuliana Sgrena the night before her release. However, in this video the kidnappers make some stunning accusations which stand the conventional understanding of the war in Iraq and the nature of the insurgency on its head.

The kidnappers, if indeed this video is from them, claim that they never wanted a ransom. They knew of a CIA plot to kill Giuliana Sgrena and they took her into their protective custody to prevent her murder. They say they support the activities of all journalists be they Muslim or not. They imply but do not say that the attack on Giuliana Sgrena by American soldiers was premeditated.

They weren't done. They claim that they, the Islamic Resistence of Iraq, are not guilty of attacks on innocent Muslims and cite a passage from the Quran which prohibits such things in addition to the killing of women and children. Then came the most startling assertion: They accuse the US of deceiving the world as to the nature of the insurgency in Iraq and the kidnappers angrily charge that there is an "army of occupation in Iraq under the name of Al Zarqawi" and that it was sent there to destroy the Resistence by causing a fratricidal war among them. They did not actually say, but certainly left open the idea, that Al Zarqawi was Washington's man.

La Repubblica's report left many in Italy bewildered. The idea the the US was hostile to Sgrena came as no shock but the rest seemed so counterintuitive. Was the video from the kidnappers and if so could their claims possibly be true? Or were the insurgents trying to exculpate themselves in the eyes of the world's Muslims from all the horrible violence by blaming their enemy? If it was true why go public with this now? The timing seems suspicious. Italian Muslims quickly verified the Quranic passage cited by the insugents but the Quran is hardly a secret document, what does the accuracy of the reference prove? And if the video wasn't produced by the Kidnappers, who did make it? And why aren't the kidnappers refuting it?

The video was shown in hospital to the convalescing journalist and she was quite insistent that the video had been doctored. Viewing the new second part of the video gives the impression that the later comments were made while Sgrena was sitting at the table. Sgrena, who speaks Arabic, said categorically that it did not happen that way. This challenge to its authenticity apparently was enough to keep media outlets worldwide from reporting on its existence and sharply diminished the ammount of chatter it got around the country. People began to speak of it dismissively.

Sgrena did confirm that she was told of the CIA plot to kill her by her captors, true or not. And viewing the tape it is not clear, some have said, that the kidnappers are trying to convince people that the new statements in it were made contemporaneously to the making of the original tape. This latter interpretation goes that the kidnappers may have used the tape because they knew that there was nothing on it which would reveal their identities or location. It had already been vetted, so to speak. It was a safe means of distributing their new message.

In any case, the controversy regarding the mysterious tape was given new life when Berlusconi confirmed that no ransom was in fact paid. The video was released when media, including some in the United Staes, were circulating the then uncontested story of a payment of $1,000,000. The
video makers, whoever they may be, knew that this was not the case.

Does this mean that the video is genuine? Not necessarily, and even if it is from the kidnappers it doesn't mean their other claims are true. They might have meretriciously thrown a fact into the video to lend credibility to what was otherwise a disinformation effort, perhaps a part of their own fratricidal war.

And if it wasn't they who made the tape then who did? It would have to be some person or group fairly high up on the Italian or American Iraq intelligence food chain. What was their motive? The most outlandish theory along these lines is that Berlusconi himself is behind it. Advocates of this intrigue believe if Berlusconi can provide an face-saving excuse to withdraw from Iraq he might just be able to save himself from the fate of Mr Aznar in Spain and win the upcoming election.

Well maybe, but so far he has been supportive of the Americans warning his people not to "fall into anti-americanism." If Berlusconi performs a public seperation ritual from Washington and times the withdrawal of Italian troops for the election then this interpretation may have some merit. Right now it seems a bit much, although I do imagine Signor Berlusconi is tiring of Washington's tough love vis a vis all matters Iraqi.

Does the release of this tape represent a palace revolt in the White House? This administration has no shortage of in-house enemies. And if so does it mean that the accusations are true. Again, not necessarily. The depth of anti-Bush sentiment within the government is high enough that maybe somebody is running a black-op against him.

The tape was handed over by La Repubblica to the Italian government and so far they have not said a word about it. What is certain is that people intimately connected with the Giuliana Sgrena hostage negotiations have produced a video whose content implies that the government of the United
States is behind at least some of the terrorist attacks in Iraq. On the surface it seems too incredible to be true, and may very well not be, but it does explain some things which have thus far appeared anachronistic.

For instance, it has been generally acknowleged that from day one of the invasion the American military has been extremely lax in securing military sites. This is made all the more disturbing when one considers that the stated reason for the war was to find weapons of mass destruction. The US left armories unguarded and allowed the Iraqi army to melt back into the civilian population. It strains credulity to its limits to think that the folly of this passed undetected in Washington. US postwar policy was a recipe for insurgency.

But why? If Bush's intention was, as many have speculated, to establish permanent military bases in the oil rich region then a strong insurgency would justify a continued American presence until such time as the Iraqi situation passed from the public's gaze and the US military could quietly take up permanent residence. Also, the atrocities committed by the insurgents such as the beheadings continue to bolster Bush's idiotic claims about fighting "evil" in his global war on terror. It simply would not do to have an orderly, international law-abiding insurgency which never targeted civilians while the US military went around using DU and other chemical weapons and torturing innocents in prisons like Abu Gharaib. The allegations made by the people behind the video may not be as preposterous as they first appear.

I don't know what to believe but what is undeniably true is that the existence of this tape is the best kept media secret in the world. Even La Repubblica has let the story pass from its pages. Why?



:: Article nr. 10386 sent on 14-mar-2005 23:19 ECT

www.uruknet.info?p=10386

Link: www.countercurrents.org/iraq-fryett120305.htm



:: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website.

The section for the comments of our readers has been closed, because of many out-of-topics.
Now you can post your own comments into our Facebook page: www.facebook.com/uruknet





       
[ Printable version ] | [ Send it to a friend ]


[ Contatto/Contact ] | [ Home Page ] | [Tutte le notizie/All news ]







Uruknet on Twitter




:: RSS updated to 2.0

:: English
:: Italiano



:: Uruknet for your mobile phone:
www.uruknet.mobi


Uruknet on Facebook






:: Motore di ricerca / Search Engine


uruknet
the web



:: Immagini / Pictures


Initial
Middle




The newsletter archive




L'Impero si è fermato a Bahgdad, by Valeria Poletti


Modulo per ordini




subscribe

:: Newsletter

:: Comments


Haq Agency
Haq Agency - English

Haq Agency - Arabic


AMSI
AMSI - Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq - English

AMSI - Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq - Arabic




Font size
Carattere
1 2 3





:: All events








     

[ home page] | [ tutte le notizie/all news ] | [ download banner] | [ ultimo aggiornamento/last update 01/01/1970 01:00 ]




Uruknet receives daily many hacking attempts. To prevent this, we have 10 websites on 6 servers in different places. So, if the website is slow or it does not answer, you can recall one of the other web sites: www.uruknet.info www.uruknet.de www.uruknet.biz www.uruknet.org.uk www.uruknet.com www.uruknet.org - www.uruknet.it www.uruknet.eu www.uruknet.net www.uruknet.web.at.it




:: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
::  We always mention the author and link the original site and page of every article.
uruknet, uruklink, iraq, uruqlink, iraq, irak, irakeno, iraqui, uruk, uruqlink, saddam hussein, baghdad, mesopotamia, babilonia, uday, qusay, udai, qusai,hussein, feddayn, fedayn saddam, mujaheddin, mojahidin, tarek aziz, chalabi, iraqui, baath, ba'ht, Aljazira, aljazeera, Iraq, Saddam Hussein, Palestina, Sharon, Israele, Nasser, ahram, hayat, sharq awsat, iraqwar,irakwar All pictures

url originale



 

I nostri partner - Our Partners:


TEV S.r.l.

TEV S.r.l.: hosting

www.tev.it

Progetto Niz

niz: news management

www.niz.it

Digitbrand

digitbrand: ".it" domains

www.digitbrand.com

Worlwide Mirror Web-Sites:
www.uruknet.info (Main)
www.uruknet.com
www.uruknet.net
www.uruknet.org
www.uruknet.us (USA)
www.uruknet.su (Soviet Union)
www.uruknet.ru (Russia)
www.uruknet.it (Association)
www.uruknet.web.at.it
www.uruknet.biz
www.uruknet.mobi (For Mobile Phones)
www.uruknet.org.uk (UK)
www.uruknet.de (Germany)
www.uruknet.ir (Iran)
www.uruknet.eu (Europe)
wap.uruknet.info (For Mobile Phones)
rss.uruknet.info (For Rss Feeds)
www.uruknet.tel

Vat Number: IT-97475012153