December 2, 2005
Under the article 'The UNITED STATES of MONSTERS: DEPLETED URANIUM" http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71481
I made the following 'URGENT UPDATE: Iran Revolutionary Guards chief
vows to defeat U.S. in Iraq’, giving the newswire related there in
full. To this (and my general productivity in the site iraq-war.ru) I
got the following response from a hacker (on the site mentioned)
calling himself Xuma:
"Information overflow. The problem of the internet is organizing
and digesting the relevant stuff. If you have actually digested all the
zillions of links you post here we'd like to see the result of your
mental process. Xuma."
As this has actually been my intention all along, and I’ve now
digested "the zillions of wires", I accept the 'challenge’ by Xuma, and
in what follows I will present the results. (Note, that in the article,
§1 gives a 'historical’ introduction (which you can pass at will),
while the business, newswires on Iraq war are folded open to an
analysis in §2. For the reasons of space, I limit myself to the
immediate context of the U.S. defeat.
§1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. The process I’ve gone through (with the kindly support of the
site iraq-war.ru) is not mental, but analytical, a compilated report of
the situation in Iraq, now ready to be published.
The demand for such an report has been urgent after the U.S. and
it’s allies seemingly lost the war in Iraq (for this cf. my preliminary
announcement in the article "The Puppet Masters in Iraq, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71077). As this is still lacking confirmation, it is exactly this what is sought in what follows.
1.2. As a backround I refer to some previous articles by me:
(1) The Puppet Masters in Iraq, 23.11.2005 (14:20) http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71077.
(2) The UNITED STATES of MONSTERS: DEPLETED URANIUM, 27.11.2005 (10:45), http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71481.
(3) On the term 'insurgent’ nowadays, 29.11.2005 (06:47), http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71664.
These articles were written simply because "they were not there",
and I wanted to make the changed situation (now fully seen as the
current U.S. disaster) in Iraq known ASAP.
All the articles share a directly related common factor, the
failure U.S. (neocons) War Plan and the rise of Iran and, the issue I
deem all-important for the future of Iraq in the future.
In these articles I’m also hinting that the U.S. has lost it’s
colonial War (or simply dropped out of it), and that the central theme
from now on is whether it’s possible to prevent the 'bubbling-under’
Shia-Sunni-Kurd civil war from exploding beyond control.
1.3. The change of balance escalated publicly few days later (in
28.11.2005) with the appearance of a newswire 'US to reach out to Iran
to subdue Iraq unrest’ http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?
page=2005%5C11%5C28%5Cstory_28-11-2005_pg7_2. Above all, it
indicated that there may be possible connection between the U.S.
(through the (neocon) 'Iraqi’ puppet government) and the old U.S. enemy
number One, Iran (long credited as "the Great Satan" by U.S.
propaganda)
1.4. Although expecting this (due to the change of the Puppet
Masters), I felt the immense importance of the wire, and sent it
immediately to the iraq-war.ru (now http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71530),
adding some preliminary comments to explain it. Besides, I passed the
News to 'Someone’ (a nick-name used hereafter), who replied
immediately:
1.5. "Thanks, Jouna: it's maybe the biggest news story I've read recently.
Yesterday I had an exchange of emails with ******** about the
"Iranian" occupation of Iraq (i pointed out to him also your article The
puppet masters in iraq), and i wrote that in my opinion the neocons
consciously replaced Saddam with Iran-backed shiites.
Now I received confirmation.
I reposted on uruknet some articles saying that US will wage war against
Iran, but I never believed this hypothesis. I've always agreed with Xymphora
(I don't know who he's, but his blog is really great)
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=14245
http://uruknet.info/?p=9694
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=15181"
1.6. I had shared this kind of view of the existence of a hideous
Neocon Plan untill the time of the Puppet Masters, after which I had
steadily shifted towards the opinion that actually the U.S. has lost
the war, and accordingly, the neocon plan has failed once and forever.
As I have a high opinion of Someone and his/her expertise, I once
more took up the possibility of ultra-hideous neocons involvement,
looking through whether they were actually cooperating with Iran – or
tricking them to attack U.S. (and Israel) thus giving tgem an excuse to
a war against Iran.
1.7. Fundamentally the article "On the term 'insurgency’ nowadays"
was written to test independently the mutated U.S., puppet government
and Iran relations (this was done simply by comparing their new
propaganda terminology respectively: e.g. if U.S. starts targeting
'rebels’ (as the puppet government) and defending the 'insurgents’,
perhaps with a newly coined term(s), it could be verified that the
neocons were actually collaborating with the puppet government – and
with Iran. It has turned out, that this is not the case, not at least
at the moment I’m writing this.
1.8. Right after this, a second newswire, "Iran Revolutionary Guards chief vows to defeat U.S. in Iraq" appeareds (cf. http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=4617)
appeared. I sent also this to iraq-war.ru, and again passed it to
Someone in order to push forward the case against the ultra-hideous
neocon plan mastering Shias.
Someone replied as follows:
"My usual thanks, Jouna. Another big news story, indeed.
Of course I don't believe that Iran "was exporting its Islamic revolution to Iraq" against US' will.
I think that's exactly what the neoncons want. At least for the moment."
I found the possibility of the neocons still in charge most
disturbing, not least because I’ve deemed the the neocons themselves
disturbed par excellance (a judgement based on their irreal actions).
Besides, I – like Someone – still kept the neocon dys-option open. At
this point I found no other way out than to analyze the Xymphora
articles (mentioned above) thoroughly.
1.9. Concerning these my response (repeated here in full, with the errors as such) was as follows:
"Someone,
I've now checked the Xymphora.
The big picture given by X is essentially as I see (and as I’ve seen) it
myself. In what follows, I’ll be commenting quotes from the uruknet articles
you sent me. I’ve done some editing additions in square brackets are
supplied by me, and my comments are separated from the articles by a star
- Like this, I mean. Also I’ve freely joined the two articles together
freely, so what follows is a kind of mess of them and my comments. (I’m
already sorry for it’s unfinished form and mistakes in syntax, but I thought
you might like to see it soon).
Here you are:
Analysis: XYMPHORA
Their the neocons interests are definitely not the same as the interests
of the United States. The neocons have but two goals, not necessarily in
this order:
GOAL 1: gain control of all the Middle Eastern oil fields (...) to dominate
the world (...). The neocons could care less about the type of government in
Iraq, as the oil fields will continue to be guarded by a huge contingent of
American troops.
- Exactly so. To this very purpose
The Iraqi-Iranian war (1980’s) failed to accomplish the dissolution of
Iraq, so the Americans were tricked by the neocons into the attack on Iraq
- Here omitted is of course the failed 1990’s plan to strangle Iraq from
air, but as we are aware of it, we don’t have to discuss this any further.
Bush and his collective brain used the pretext of an attack on the US by
Islamic extremists to overthrow a secular Arab government - that of Iraq.
An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart (...) The Sunnis will never accept
Shi'ite rule, and the continuing resistance will eventually lead to civil
war. (...) three (or more) states will exist around Basra, Baghdad and Mosul
(the Shi'ite, the Sunni and Kurdish). This breakdown inevitably resulted in
a civil war between the Arab Shi'ite and Sunnite communities in Iraq which
will negatively affect all of Iraq's Arab neighbors.
- My knowledge of the "Middle East" is not good enough to decide whether
this is certainly true or not. But we could suppose so.
The Americans (...) have been
(1) disbanding the Iraqi army (...) and ba’ath party
(2) setting up an election guaranteed to disenfranchise Sunnis (...)
(3) provoking a civil war through failing to provide security (...)
(4) arranging faked terrorist attacks on Shi'ites (...)
(5) installing a very Iran-friendly Iraqi government, including neocon
Chalabi (...) whose job all along was to forge an alliance with Iran
- However, I must mention this goal requires a constant U.S. military
presence on the area. It is exactly this factor, which has been crumbling.
I’ve monitored the U.S. military effort closely and for me it has been
more and more clear that the U.S. Army has failed. It can not hold it’s
position as required. I’m not claiming this only myself, but rather claiming
that the Iranians have seen their defeat too, and not only them. I’m also
backed up by e.g. an article "Nowhere to run" www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/
Story/0,2763,1653454,00.html, from which I would like to present you the
following quotes
a) "There is a remarkable article in the latest issue of the American Jewish
weekly, Forward. It calls for President Bush to be impeached and put on
trial "for misleading the American people, and launching the most foolish
war since Emperor Augustus in 9 BC sent his legions into Germany and lost
them".
b) "(...) the writer is well qualified to know. He is Martin van Creveld, a
professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and one of the world's
foremost military historians. Several of his books have influenced modern
military theory and he is the only non-American author on the US Army's list
of required reading for officers."
GOAL 2. establish Greater Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates.?
Greater Israel cannot occur until the country of Iraq is broken up. (...)
Israel will build 'Greater Israel' in a hostile Muslim world by principles
(1) The divide-and-conquer
(2) The 'doctrine of the periphery', (alliances with non-Arab Turkey and
Iran)
(3) The Shi'ite-Sunni rift within Islam.
- Absolutely correct again. One could also add some other hideous plots,
mainly the covert operations, dominating the entire War on Terror, which
should for the extended use of them rather be called (U.S.-Israel) "Terror
on War". But note the following:
(a) They may have succeeded in divide and rift, yes, because the division
and rift (i.e. between the Sunnis and Shias was already there.
The possibilities of U.S.-Israel were then that:
(1) there was a deal made between Iran, Israel and the Bushies in advance of
the invasion of Iraq (even in advance of 911?), or
- As we discussed in our previous mail, it’s highly unlikely that the
Iranian leadership has a deal with Bushies. Nor is a deal with neocons
likely, since they are the Zionists "an sich", against whom Mr. Ahmednejad
delivered his very first speech some three months ago ("Wipe the Israel
off").
(2) that the Israelis and neocons believed that the chaos caused to the
Arab world would be worth the danger of empowering the Shi'ite theocrats
without striking a deal.
- Not quite so, but something between the (1) and (2), namely
(3) to posit a double standard puppet govt, friendly both to Iranians and
the U.S. – in theory at least.
So the neocons decided to arrange the situation so by (...) fighting
Sunnis (...) creating (...) a Shi'ite empire consisting of Iran and Iraq.
(...) 'Greater Israel' can extend all the way to the Euphrates over Sunni
lands, and your new friend = Iran may even help you (it will be a much
bigger challenge heading towards the Nile!).
Finally Xymphora concludes:
It is a brilliant plan, which can only be foiled if pan-Arab nationalism can
win out over fractures within Islam.
- Exactly here, I think, I’m not ready to agree with Xymfora, not at least
at the moment, since there’s an another possiblity how the plan can fail,
not considered thoroughly by Xymphora, and the possibility, which has now
been almost achieved by the Sunnis, namely
(b) the military defeat of the U.S. Coalition. They have not succeeded in
(1) CONQUERING the Iraq nor (2) forming the military ALLIANCES required:
Turkey was – of fear of birth of independent Kurdistan – of no help in
the first place, neither of military help is Jordan, nor is the Coalition,
since is crumbling down soon, if no miraculous results can be shown to it’s
representatives to prevent this.
- Now, what I’m wondering is how the neocons can be seen victorious, if and
when they’ll soon have no military control over Iraq, since the country in
whole is soon to be controlled by the Iraqi and Iranian Shias, of which the
last mentioned will absolutely deny the U.S. and Israel presence there. I
fully agree with Xymphora that
The Shi'ite clerical hierarchy that has controled Iran for 26 years now
controls Iraq as well, thanks to the US of A. (...)
- But with U.S. military out, the U.S. has lost, and so have the neocons.
Or do you think that the neocons will be able to convince the U.S. public
that it’s time to invade Iraq again. And after that also Iran? Concerning
the aftermath Xymphora relates:
The neocons will be able to use alleged Iranian meddling in Iraq as one of
their excuses for the new war on Iran (...) Shi'ite empire won't be a
problem for the neocons once Iran is smoldering under American and Israeli
nukes.
- I’m suspicious towards the possibility of a nuclear war on the area,
but I may be wrong, since the neocons are absolutely utopists (= loonies),
but this must have not been their original intention, you see, why didn’t
they just nuke the Iran in the first place then, instead of getting in Iraq
(and getting beated there). It makes no sense. This is the point, where I
find the Xymphora difficult to follow. If you can show me something I do not
know here (and there’s a lot of it, for sure), I’m very grateful, since I
find no help from what follows:
- Here some fake "difficulties" in the U.S. War are explained. Then
Xymphora continues:
It is (...) difficult (...) to believe that the experts at the Pentagon and
Herzliya who planned this operation did not foresee it as well.
- There’s a supposition here, which is one of my main reasons to keep the
neocon success issue open (i.e. not to make up my mind). Namely, for some
time on I’ve had the feeling that not only the neocon planners have been
aware of the events to come, but that behind them, the Iranians are even
more aware of the neocon plan, which – and here I again agree with
Xymphora – is really obvious. Like Xymphora I am not well informed nor
terribly
bright and I "got it" already semptember 2001, right after "Mr" Bush
connected Iraq to "al-Qaida". From what I’ve seen, the Iranians are far
brighter than all the neocons together (I’ll come back to this, but I would
just point out,that they are – if I got it right – at least one, perhaps
several steps in front of the neocons at the present). So, I may be deceived
by the neocons to a illusion they just want to create, but at the present
I’m seeing the situation as if the neocons would actually have lost.
The reasons for this are obvious. They were (and still are) military
amateurs. Just could not handle it, measure what it takes, and how it
must be done. That’s it."
1.10. To this, Someone replied directly, obviously posting a
newswire to the site uruknet, which in it’s turn decided to take it. If
you open the article 'Costly Withdrawal Is the Price To Be Paid for a
Foolish War’ (http://uruknet.info/?p=18308&hd=0&size=1&l=x, sent on 01-dec-2005 00:20 ECT), you’ll see that the item is the one I’m indirectly referring to (by Martin van Creveld, www.forward.com/articles/6936).
1.11. To let my fellow users of iraq-war.ru enjoy the item, I
posited a link right where it (in my opinion) belongs: as a comment to
the critics of Bush 'National Strategy for Victory’ speech ("Victory,
Mr President?", http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71904),
which is now preemptively, preventively, refutated by the most
respected Israeli military expert, who claims the war is lost. Like me.
Like Someone. Like uruknet. Like millions and millions others. Simply
because the war is lost. The issue here is not, whether I, Someone,
uruknet or van Creveld (or some others, too) are of this opinion (or
not), but the facts about the war, available in the internet as proofs
for this.
1.12. This brings me to the the "zillions" of links (BACKROUND,
RELATED, UPDATE etc.), which I’ve delivered to iraq-war.ru to make this
case. The basic idea has been to carefully selected the relevant links,
offering true information on the situation around the war in Iraq to
form an accurate "big picture". As the single newswires can easily be
misleading (and often are by purpose), I chose comparing several wires
with each other, dropping the false ones out. I’ve been doing this by
using normal iraq-war.ru newswires as NEWS FOLDERS, containing several
related wires, and not accepting contradictory forgeries among them
(exept by mistake of course).
In last few days each of the iraq-war.ru newswires has been
treates by me as a independent news folder describing some certain main
player or factor in the Iraq war. Let me give you some examples how to
gather my report on U.S. defeat contained in these folders (I’ll be
sketching the report itself at the same time).
§ 2. The UNITED STATES of MONSTERS: The LOST WAR IN IRAQ
2.0. INTRODUCTION
Anticipating the emerging U.S.-Shia split, I sent the newswire 'Scott Ritter Speaks Out on wars against Iraq and Iran’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71811, providing some preliminary backround and updates for it. This was to prepare the users of iraq-war.tu in what was to come.
2.1. The U.S. of MONSTERS: SITUATION in NOV/DEC 2005
2.1.1. The "U.S.-ISRAEL" newsfolder (sent and updated by me) is given as an article 'US Willing To Discuss Iraq With Iran’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71840, with further backround to Israel:
(A) 'US Report Calls on Israel to Begin Nuclear Disarmament’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71626. Here, the U.S. situation, relations and events are linked to the related articles.
(B) Furthermore, the critique of the U.S. position is given in the separate "folder" 'Victory, Mr President?’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71904. This item was already neatly anticipated by KamikazeToyota in http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71813.
(C) I’ve also given some preliminaries in a separate Israel newsfolder 'EU hits at Israeli policies in East Jerusalem’ http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71386 (note there the U.K. condemnation of Israeli politics, and items clarifying to the Israeli involvement in war).
From these news folders taken together, you can readily see the
situation of the U.S.-Israeli 'alliance’ (and you can quess the rest.
The only option Israel could take, a desperate military involvement
could only lead to it’s own defeat too. No wonder Martin van Creveld
focuses to the withdrawal.
2.1.2. The "U.S. ARMY" news folder is currently '52-year-old
grandfather ordered to Army duty – Hard-pressed military tapping
retirees’, revealing some latest facts and the condition of the U.S.
troops in Iraq, cf. http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71759.
For the earlier newsfolders on this issue cf. e.g.
(A) ’Bush, Rumsfeld Argue Against Iraq Pullout’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71748, and
(B) Iraqi official sees up to 30,000 US troops leaving, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71732 and also
(C) 'US military fatalities jump 130 - unexplained’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71668 (with the hint to the possibility of the real casualties around 8000+). Note also
(D) 'US may use planes as substitute for troops in Iraq’ http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71593,
where I give some comments to calm down the readers (explaining why the
plan forwarded by the headline (and wire) won’t work either).
(E) The U.S. Army morale is handled e.g. in 'L.A. Times' Profiles U.S. Officer Who Committed Suicide in Iraq, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71524, but there are other folders too.
(F) the "mercenary" article 'Trophy' video exposes private security contractors shooting up Iraqi drivers’, in http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71511.
If you choose to click this you’ll notice that I haven’t forgotten the
issue, but kept the story going on till the day I shifted writing this
article.
There’s a whole lot of news folders like this on the site, and if
you are interested for the extra verification that the U.S. Army is
nearly finished, just follow the track down till you hit a headline
which might look like a related folder.
To put it short, the position of U.S. army is neatly described in
the article '"We Can Lose In Iraq And Destroy Our Army, Or We Can Just
Lose" Says Marine Lieutenant Colonel Recently Returned From Iraq’,
included in GI SPECIAL 3D24 http://uruknet.info/?p=m18157. The explanation of the failure of U.S. New Iraq Army (or Iraqi Security Force) is given there prettily.
2.1.3. The "COALITION OF THE WILLING" news folder (with a link to
the previous state of affairs amongst the coalition) is the newswire
'Japan to extend Iraq mission by one year’ http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71839.
(A) Note also 'Iran’s Foreign Minister demands U.S. departure from Iraq’ http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71624.
(B) As it is faster to refer to the coalition directly, I’m giving you more links right as such right here:
a. Defense Minister: All Bulgarian Troops will Have Left Iraq by Dec. 31st, http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?catid=111&newsid=77474&ch=0
b. Danish FM says Iraq withdrawal possible in 2006, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-11/25/content_3831757.htm
c. Italy to give Iraq pullout calendar in few weeks, http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=74357
IRAQ, BERTINOTTI: 'UNIONE' PROGRAMME INCLUDES PULLOUT
http://www.agi.it/english/news.pl?doc=200511261722-1195-RT1-CRO-0-
d. 'SOUTH KOREA: BILL ALLOWS IRAQ TROOP WITHDRAWAL BEFORE END-2006’, http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level.php?cat=Security&loid=8.0.233289536&par=0
e. Lithuania to Withdraw Part of Troops from Iraq, http://www.focus-fen.net/index.phpcatid=135&newsid=77320&ch=0&datte=2005-11-25
f. Poland will pull out troops from Iraq next year, http://www.radio.com.pl/polonia/article.asp?tId=30048&j=2
g. Straw wants speedy withdrawal of UK troops from Iraq (Updated - supported by Talabani, www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/69886
h. Cheney Calls Iraq Pullout 'Dangerous', http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/26-11212005-573519.html
i. Coalition withdrawal from Iraq would be "catastrophic": president, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/69985
I’m happy that at least once, Georgie "der Führer" Bush and Dick
"re-writing the history" Cheney are telling the Truth: no member of the
"Coalition of the Killing" is planning to stay after 2006, which gives
the ultimate deadline for the "catastrophy".
2.1.4. The "NEW IRAQI ARMY" news folder is the article 'US, Iraqi troops begin new offensive in Iraq’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71835. Some earlier facts on this issue are available in:
(A) 'Iraq delays offensive amid rebel contacts’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71539, in
(B) 'Iraq calls off planned offensive’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71536.
(C) Note the following selected articles will show you the state of NIA (or ISF):
a. U.S. general says Iraq has one combat-ready battalion. http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2005-09-29-iraqtestimony_x.htm?csp=34
b. Casey says U.S. on right track in Iraq, http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/special_packages/iraq/13252156.htm.
I’ve a lot of further links right here in my desktop, but I’m not
givingin full, still hesitating whether or not to write a separate
article on this issue. It’s however more and more certain that the NIA
will collapse if the U.S. troops are pulled out. Which is funny as it
can’t operate without U.S. support in Iraq: all alone, they would be
massacred and/or slain apart in a matter of weeks (or monts at max).
Further problems are caused by the increasing Iranian influence on
them.
2.2. The UNITED STATES of MONSTERS: The "ENEMIES"
2.2.0. As U.S. itself defines as terrorists those nations that are
not with them, I’m giving all the rest here. (Not meaning that all of
them would be in war With the U.S. nor that they will be, but just
stating at least the lack of support for the U.S.)
2.2.1. The "IRAQI RESISTANCE" (mainly SUNNI) news folder is 'Sunnis Welcome US Bid to Talk With Resistance’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71903.
This folder contains few wires on general lines, as the Resistance
speaks best for itself in the action: the attacks agaist the U.S.
Coalition of which iraq-war.ru have an excellent coverage (the IRR, and
the articles like 'Five US soldiers killed in Iraq’, 'Insurgents Attack
U.S. Bases in Iraq’ (from 2.12.2005), etc. To not increase the already
vaste number of links required for this reporty, I usually avoid
internal links (which would be in vain too, since this is done better
by IRR).
(A) An earlier folder on Resistance is e.g. 'Pro-Saddam insurgents
embrace holy war-official’
[http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71489, with some comments
on my position towards the Resistance and links describing the U.S.
possibilities against the Resistance.
First and foremost, whether Sunnis, Shias, Kurdis, or others, as
long as the U.S. Coalition (or it’s puppets) stand on the soil (or
around it), this party can only get stronger, stronger and stronger.
Exactly as it has steadily done all along the occupation. The only
question is when and how it’s steps into the mobile and offensive
phase, and wipes out the occupiers. "Long lives the Resistance."
2.2.2. "AFGHANISTAN" news folder (including the Central Asia) is
sent (and further linked) by me as 'Collective Security Organization
alarmed by Afghan situation’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71906. Earlier stages of latest Afganistan developments, cf. also under 'Around the world’.
2.2.3. The "IRAN" news folder is currently the article 'Rumsfeld says Iran, Syria are unhelpful in Iraq’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71869
(sent and updated by me). As a preparation for the new phase on Iran
issue, I’ve already sent in the next central communication by the
Iranians, the wire
(A) ’Iran against nuke weapons: Minister’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71980.
(B) I’m referring to Iran (passim) after the first one 'Iraq: Iranian infiltrators reported in Basra’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71396, so I’m not bothering you with details here).
2.2.4. The "SHIA MILITIA" news folder is 'Shiite Deaths Squads? (added)’, in http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71679
(with updates). These 'troops’, originally trained by U.S. (and who
knows who else?) are now by and large beyond U.S. control and thus
belong more likely to their enemies already. A likely line of command
connects these organisations straight to the Iraqi puppet government or
to the Iran (cf. 2.2.3.) – or both.
2.2.6. The "SYRIA" news folder is the current TOP NEWS, 'Hariri Report Discredited, UN Questions Syrians’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71701. Anticipating the continuation of this issue, I've delivered the CIA -Mossad connection there, hoping that the revealing of
this treason will nullify the threat against Syria sometimes soon.
(B) Many of my previous folders on Syria are under 'Around the
world’ and as they are easy to find there, I’m not repeating them here.
2.2.6. The "TURKEY" news folder. As Turkey has now openly entered
the stage, I’ve not only sent the announcement of it’s siding (cf.
'Turkey, Iran reiterate joint will to fight terrorism’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71932.
Note that the 'terrorism’ is defined in this article as 'PKK’ (the
Kurdis), which can be seen directed "against the U.S." by definition
(above). The main relations of Turkey (except of Israel, for which I
couldn’t find a proper wire) are introduced there
(A) The lacking 'Israel’ wire was given after this by the
separate article 'Israelis training Kurds in northern Iraq - report’,
found in http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/72001.
2.2.7. Pretty squarely, you can add the rest of the world here,
too. This is not public yet, since many are still waiting more evidence
for the evident U.S. failure (using this to backup themselves against
this).
2.3. The UNITED STATES of MONSTERS: GENOCIDE in IRAQ
2.3.0. Due to my heavy involvement in the previous analysis, I’ve
been almost fully committed to the previous issues, and I would like to
apologize that I haven’t been able to do more on this side of the
matter. Although my effort has been more modest as it should be, I have
however done something:
2.3.1. The current 'GENOCIDE in IRAQ’ news folder is 'UK guilty of Iraq 'genocide,' says Welsh Muslim councillor’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71633.
(A) As Mr. Ahmadinejad has had the courage to condemn the deeds of
the U.S. in this, I sent the corresponding article 'Iranian president
calls for war crimes charges on US’, now in http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71438 (with comments). Related to this is the following:
2.3.1. U.S. USE of WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION. To assist the Iraqi people and their cause, you should note
(a) the Nuclear News folder, currently "The UNITED STATES of
MONSTERS: DEPLETED URANIUM" (an article by me with discussion, updates
in iraq-war.ru). I pick up the initiative of Mr. Ahmadinejad and
personally challence the other leaders of the world to answer his call
in my article "The UNITED STATES of MONSTERS: DEPLETED URANIUM" (note
here also my updates on the DU Iraq). Deeming the issue serious, I’ve
gained some extra coverage for it via al Basrah and uruknet (both with
pictures). I've also written to whatreallyhappened and asked if they
would take the article, and recommended the team iraq-war.ru to use
their contacts and pass the issue to the Russian Duma, (hoping they
would internationally condemn the U.S. use of DU in Iraq as requested
by Mr. Ahmadinejad).
(b) Remembering Fallujah, I’ve taken notice of the latest
outrageous claim by U.S., now taken account by the newswire 'US: White
phosphorus use legitimate’ http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71810.
I have also passed an info about this twisted turn of events to
Gabriele Zamparini, who – as you may remember – has been pretty tight
on this matter, especially what comes to the corp media spreading
claims such as the one above.
2.3.2. The TORTURE in IRAQ. Not to forget this issue, the news
folder (with some extra weight by updates) is the article 'Iraqi govt
fails to deliver on torture probe’ (with further link). Note also the
article 'Gallup: Americans Against Torture, But Believe We Do It’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71880
(updated, backrounded), giving the real (non-governmental American
stand on this subjeckt). On this matter note also the 'Abuse worse than
under Saddam – Iraqi leader’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71490.
2.3.3. The U.S. OCCUPATION. Giving a general statement of the facts
around this I’ve sent in the article 'U.S. Occupation is Worse Than
Hussein’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71888 with some updates (to be continued...). An earlier version of this folder is the article
(A) 'The only WMD in Iraq are US soldiers’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71573 (with my update).
(B) Under the article 'The US Plans a Long, Long Stay in Iraq’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71512,
I’m personally suggesting, that 'Staying the course will lead U.S. to a
massive Dien Bien Phu, if the the Sunnis and the Shias are able to put
their quarrels aside and concentrate on the true enemy. In this
connection, note also the article
(C) 'Let's ask the Iraqi people if U.S. forces should leave’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71496 (my Flashback here to be seen in the context that the U.S. troops have now been asked to leave by the Puppet Govt).
(D) My legal view on U.S. occupation is forwarded by the choise of the article 'Hussein set to argue Iraq isn't sovereign’,
http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71483. The article is unrefutabely true in contents, since no occupied country is sovereign.
2.4. The FUTURE of IRAQ.
2.4.1. On the general issue of the growing INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT
for the Iraqi people I’ve recently sent the article 'French Fighters in
Iraq Puzzle Paris’ http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71760. Looking the discussion under it, it seems that our visitors there have already solved the puzzle :)
I’ve also tried to push forward the cause of the INDEPENDENT media
in all possible ways (these including also a separate article
'Independent, investigating media: facing bomb and virus epidemics’ by
me, cf. http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71400).
Here I’ve wanted to make known the difficulties around the sites so
very close to all of us, al-Jazeera, uruknet, whatreallyhappened and –
of course – the iraq-war.ru.
2.4.2. Having lot lost my hope of Iraq, I’ve e.g. sent in the article 'Talk of civil war in Iraq is not backed by the facts’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71482
(with the heading "Robert Fisk tells Haroon Siddiqui that Arabs want
freedom — from the West"), still hoping that the U.S. neocon plan of
provoking a civil war between the Shia, Sunni and Kurdish will fail,
after the real problem, the U.S. and it’s criminal "Coalition" have
vanished. As I’ve shown above, there is light certainly rising here,
and I truely hope this opportunity is not wasted.
2.4.3. I’ve connecting this directly to thenewswire 'Iran eager to establish friendly relations with all nations: Ahmadinejad’, http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71452, demanding that he will keep his word also what comes to the Sunnis, a request also included in mentioned articles by me.
2.4.4. Finally to my personal opinion, which e.g. moderator049 has
kindly encouraged me to express: in a way I’m used to express it as
described above (with links, I mean), but perhaps the following
personal note will clarify my opinion, already given as a comment 'by
jouna on 29.11.2005 22:29’ (http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71481):
"in this war I’m siding with the Sunnis, Shias AND Kurdis in Iraq,
Iran, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Afganistan etc. The Enemy is (or are) the
parties aiming at a civil war (or several of them) between these
parties. At the present, I’m seeing some LIGHT, a possibility thaat the
MUSLIMs mentioned join together against the Enemy. After this, there
wouldn’t be no discussion of "pullout timetible", but a panic of
whether they’re able to retreat at all. Accomplishing this is very
easy: should this turn take place right now in this very moment, the
Muslims could crush the Coalition of the Killing in a matter of couple
weeks (or monts), not by assaults of course, but by cutting all the
supply lines. Creating a Dien Bien Phu (or severeal of them) in Iraq
would turn the colonial expeditionary forces as POWs (in U.S. terms
'hostages’). This would secure them in the negotiations, and in would
also give a huge boost for the united Muslim interest, and perhaps
would help them to solve the Shia-Sunni disagreements, too (as they had
fought a victorious battle as brothers-in-arms)."
To this I want only add the following:
To all the Muslims and People in the world,
targeted by this horrible war:
I plead you to unite against the enemy,
and not wage a war against each other.
If you are feeling this way
my heart belongs to you.
God bless you.
jouna
|
