uruknet.info
  اوروكنت.إنفو
     
    informazione dal medio oriente
    information from middle east
    المعلومات من الشرق الأوسط

[ home page] | [ tutte le notizie/all news ] | [ download banner] | [ ultimo aggiornamento/last update 01/01/1970 01:00 ] 18711


english italiano

  [ Subscribe our newsletter!   -   Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter! ]  



What Kind of Withdrawal?


Since Rep. John Murtha’s declarations expressing the need to reconsider the presence of US troops in Iraq, we have seen a considerable increase in the volume of print-n-bytes dedicated to talk of withdrawing/redeploying US troops in Iraq. It is therefore necessary to focus on exactly what kind of withdrawal is being talked about. It is also extremely important for the Left to not lose its renewed resolve and momentum, since a corollary function of the talk of withdrawing/redeploying troops is to demobilize the antiwar activists in particular (and to allay the worries of the general public) by spreading the idea that the official representatives have heard people’s opinions as well as the voices of the military commanders and bigwigs on the ground...

[18711]



Uruknet on Alexa


End Gaza Siege
End Gaza Siege

>

:: Segnala Uruknet agli amici. Clicka qui.
:: Invite your friends to Uruknet. Click here.




:: Segnalaci un articolo
:: Tell us of an article






What Kind of Withdrawal?

REVOLUTIONARY FLOWERPOT SOCIETY

December 15, 2005

Since Rep. John Murtha’s declarations expressing the need to reconsider the presence of US troops in Iraq, we have seen a considerable increase in the volume of print-n-bytes dedicated to talk of withdrawing/redeploying US troops in Iraq. It is therefore necessary to focus on exactly what kind of withdrawal is being talked about.

It is also extremely important for the Left to not lose its renewed resolve and momentum, since a corollary function of the talk of withdrawing/redeploying troops is to demobilize the antiwar activists in particular (and to allay the worries of the general public) by spreading the idea that the official representatives have heard people’s opinions as well as the voices of the military commanders and bigwigs on the ground. By implication, people should stop worrying now, the end of the war is near and the activists need not bother raise their blood pressures any longer, implying, "We’ll take it from here!"

We must assume that the invasion and the occupation of Iraq (as much as that of Palestine) is a strategic move (I personally do worry when Condi, for example, utters the intention of 're-designing’ the Middle East, as if we were an automobile or a washing machine). And gaining strategic goals requires knowing how to cut down on losses at crucial turning points when losses start to undermine the entire operation, while maintaining overall control over the most important essentials.

A significant part of Iraqi reality is the fact that no people like to be enslaved (not to mention not liking losing privileges) and will therefore resist foreign occupiers using all necessary means. The increase in public discussions about withdrawal/redeployment of US military forces in Iraq is a signal that the Iraqi resistance, particularly by the Sunnis, has been successful to force the situation and bring about a speedier proceeding to the next phase of the strategic development.

The so-called withdrawal can take several forms and modes. Though the US armed forces are suffering tactically — in that they did not plan for, since they did not expect, the speed and the ferocity with which the resistance in Iraq attacked back — the US strategic planners still operate with the assumption that the game is not lost at all. Only the shape of the struggle will change, if they play their cards right.

It seems that what the US is pursuing is to train enough Iraqi security personnel so as to be able to take the brunt of a protracted, low intensity civil war. Once that force is even half ready, the US can pull most of its forces out, while keeping a good-sized, agile military presence in strategically located (mostly out of the way) bases in Iraq. They need not leave completely; they merely need to be less visible.

In this form (that can be more easily justified to the US citizens), coupled with control of airspace, coupled with the Shiite and Kurdish manpower, the US can maintain an actual (be it reduced) military presence for a good while in the medium term.

The so-called 'Salvadoran Option’ (death squad warfare) seems to be well in place, as well, and it can be expanded (even literally outsourced to private security companies with hired mercenaries). What can be called a 'Colombian Option’ (low-intensity, protracted civil war) can be added to the mix, and especially with the help of the hardened Kurdish peshmarga forces well into the idea of cooperating with the Americans (not to mention the Israelis) a protracted low-intensity civil war can work strategically for the US (and Israel).

And that is only the military side of the political life. The economic side of the political life in Iraq is rarely even taken into account qualitatively by the antiwar movement, on a mass scale. Bremer’s '100 Orders’ changed the entire legal structure of Iraq, not only as a state but also as a society; most significantly fundamentally changing the conditions for economic activities to the utter detriment of ordinary Iraqis.

In an article entitled, The Endless Looting of Iraq, explaining how the changed legal system has affected Iraq’s economic picture, Ghali Hassan writes, "For example, Order 39 allows for the following: (1) privatization of Iraq’s non-oil-related economy which [was] dominated by 200 state-owned enterprises; (2) 100 percent foreign ownership of Iraqi businesses; (3) 'national treatment’ of foreign firms; (4) unrestricted, tax-free remittance of all profits and other funds; and (5) 40-year ownership licenses. Thus, it allows the U.S. corporations operating in Iraq to own every business, do all of the work, and send all their money home. Nothing needs to be reinvested locally to service the Iraqi economy, no Iraqi need be hired, no public services need be guaranteed, and workers’ rights can easily be ignored. Foreign corporations can withdraw their investments at any time. Order 81 is designed to reengineer Iraq’s traditional agriculture system into a U.S.-style corporate agribusiness, and in the process enslave Iraqi farmers and undermine Iraq’s food security. All these imposed by military means — in contravention of the WTO regulations and international law — and disguised as U.S. "reconstruction efforts" to rebuild Iraq," (Online Journal, December 14, 2005).

So, even if and when the US armed forces are reduced or eliminated all together, the real goals and reasons for which the invasion took place are almost completely untouched, meaning that the US would still walk away with the economic gains it intended to achieve!

In the face of the intensity and ferocity of the Iraqi resistance, the US military presence in Iraq is now the subject of competing withdrawal/redeployment plans. Some plans would have them leave completely today, some plans would have them leave tomorrow, and some plans pin some vague future date, either 'next year’ or 'as soon as the security situation allows it’.

Almost completely missing from all those plans, both as offered by officials and as presented in the corporate media, are all the questions to do with 'how and what’: What is the content of this 'withdrawal’? Is it a real and complete and total withdrawal from Iraq, and all of the Middle East or is it an act of merely moving the soldiers around in the same general area? How will the withdrawal happen and what will it affect? What about the legal system? Can the Iraqis start suing Americans in their courts? What about the legalities that pertain to the economic life? Will the legal clock go back to the pre-invasion constitution? What particular means/materiel will this process provide to address all the facts that in the process of this 'war on terror’ were forcefully and violently changed (for worse) on the ground, both in Iraq and in the US?

Any withdrawal plan that does not address the following listed items is, I believe, therefore a sham, or a carefully designed distraction, and should be taken as a means for bringing about a strategic victory for imperialism both abroad and at home. The list is of course incomplete, may be taken as both a guideline and a list of demands, and is a minimum:

In Iraq:
1) The US armed forces must leave Iraq and return home now, completely and unconditionally.
2) Some thousands of tons of uranium-enriched munitions have pierced all manner of life in Iraq and must therefore be cleaned up as much as possible, and specialized medical care must be provided for the affected population, and reparations paid accordingly.
3) All displaced families must be compensated and reparations paid to them.
4) All the families of the killed Iraqis must be compensated and reparations paid to them.
5) All the laws passed by the occupation authorities must be automatically reversed.
6) The US must not have any authority, sanction or say-so over any Iraqi sphere of life.
7) Full reparations must be paid by the US and the UK for a bombing campaign that lasted from 1991 till today, destroying civilian infrastructure from sewage systems to roads, bridges, factories, schools and hospitals.

In the US:
1) PATRIOT Act must be annulled.
2) Habeas corpus must be restored fully and unconditionally for all.
3) All veterans (and their families) from both Iraq wars must be fully compensated for exposure to uranium-enriched munitions, whose use constitutes a war crime.
4) The authority of a single individual (the President) to declare war must be revoked completely and unconditionally and irrevocably.
5) The sole authority of the Congress (i.e., people’s democratically elected representatives) to activate the armed forces for purely defensive purposes must be re-invoked.
6) Bush and his entire administration, as well as some leading Congressional members must be brought to trial for crimes against humanity.

As long as the above demands are not addressed, we will still have work to do. For as long as we are stuck with these most recently added inequities crammed into the fabric of our already-miserable lives both in Iraq and the US as a result of this invasion, and as a result of the political atmosphere created in the US in the guise of the 'war on terror’, we will remain behind the conceptual eight ball; forever reactive, forever trying to keep up with the twists and turns thrown our way by the ruling powers that be, and therefore forever at their mercy, begging for crumbs. It is our resources that they plunder, so it is only natural that we insist on demanding justice and accountability.


:: Article nr. 18711 sent on 15-dec-2005 01:28 ECT

www.uruknet.info?p=18711

Link: revolutionaryflowerpotsociety.theblog.cc/index.php/2005/12/15/what-kind-of-withd
   rawal/#comments




:: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website.

The section for the comments of our readers has been closed, because of many out-of-topics.
Now you can post your own comments into our Facebook page: www.facebook.com/uruknet





       
[ Printable version ] | [ Send it to a friend ]


[ Contatto/Contact ] | [ Home Page ] | [Tutte le notizie/All news ]







Uruknet on Twitter




:: RSS updated to 2.0

:: English
:: Italiano



:: Uruknet for your mobile phone:
www.uruknet.mobi


Uruknet on Facebook






:: Motore di ricerca / Search Engine


uruknet
the web



:: Immagini / Pictures


Initial
Middle




The newsletter archive




L'Impero si è fermato a Bahgdad, by Valeria Poletti


Modulo per ordini




subscribe

:: Newsletter

:: Comments


Haq Agency
Haq Agency - English

Haq Agency - Arabic


AMSI
AMSI - Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq - English

AMSI - Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq - Arabic




Font size
Carattere
1 2 3





:: All events








     

[ home page] | [ tutte le notizie/all news ] | [ download banner] | [ ultimo aggiornamento/last update 01/01/1970 01:00 ]




Uruknet receives daily many hacking attempts. To prevent this, we have 10 websites on 6 servers in different places. So, if the website is slow or it does not answer, you can recall one of the other web sites: www.uruknet.info www.uruknet.de www.uruknet.biz www.uruknet.org.uk www.uruknet.com www.uruknet.org - www.uruknet.it www.uruknet.eu www.uruknet.net www.uruknet.web.at.it




:: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
::  We always mention the author and link the original site and page of every article.
uruknet, uruklink, iraq, uruqlink, iraq, irak, irakeno, iraqui, uruk, uruqlink, saddam hussein, baghdad, mesopotamia, babilonia, uday, qusay, udai, qusai,hussein, feddayn, fedayn saddam, mujaheddin, mojahidin, tarek aziz, chalabi, iraqui, baath, ba'ht, Aljazira, aljazeera, Iraq, Saddam Hussein, Palestina, Sharon, Israele, Nasser, ahram, hayat, sharq awsat, iraqwar,irakwar All pictures

url originale



 

I nostri partner - Our Partners:


TEV S.r.l.

TEV S.r.l.: hosting

www.tev.it

Progetto Niz

niz: news management

www.niz.it

Digitbrand

digitbrand: ".it" domains

www.digitbrand.com

Worlwide Mirror Web-Sites:
www.uruknet.info (Main)
www.uruknet.com
www.uruknet.net
www.uruknet.org
www.uruknet.us (USA)
www.uruknet.su (Soviet Union)
www.uruknet.ru (Russia)
www.uruknet.it (Association)
www.uruknet.web.at.it
www.uruknet.biz
www.uruknet.mobi (For Mobile Phones)
www.uruknet.org.uk (UK)
www.uruknet.de (Germany)
www.uruknet.ir (Iran)
www.uruknet.eu (Europe)
wap.uruknet.info (For Mobile Phones)
rss.uruknet.info (For Rss Feeds)
www.uruknet.tel

Vat Number: IT-97475012153