February 4, 2006
While George Bush, the man who controls the trigger of the world's greatest nuclear arsenal, expresses his fear that a "non-transparent"
and nuclear Iran might use its non-existent nuclear weapons to
blackmail the world, and his Secretary of State tells the media that the time for talking with the regime in Tehran is over, a little noticed news article appeared on the UPI wire. The essence of the story was that a group that calls itself the Foundation for Democracy in Iran
(FDI) had received word from unnamed sources in Iran that the Iranian
Air Force is moving its Shabab missiles onto mobile platforms and that
this meant that they were preparing to test a nuclear device by March
20, 2006. How one concludes that the movement of the missiles to
portable platforms is a prelude to a nuclear test and not just a
defensive move in light of the growing threat of a military attack on Iran is not stated.
aspect of the story that interested me, however, was not the dubious
conclusion that Iran had a nuclear device that was test-ready (mostly
because no other source seems to believe that this is true), but the
nature of the source for the story. What is the Foundation for
Democracy in Iran? Who funds them? A concerted web
search found very few details about the organization. Indeed, its
is barely in existence and has only three or four active links.
One is to a collection of rightwing and neocon blogs titled Blogs in Support of Real Democracy in Iran. The names of the blogs include such titles as Blogs for Condi, Love America First, American Imperialist, Blogs for FOX, and Fundamentally Right -- you get the picture. Another link is to a subscription form for the organization's newsletter titled Iran Brief -- for $1,100 a year. In terms of its listed members, there is only one. That is Kenneth Timmerman -- neocon extraordinaire, member of the fear-mongering imperial project that calls itself the Committee on the Present Danger, and contributor to the neocon rag National Review and its ultra-right counterpart FrontPagemag.com. Interesting to note is this phrase that appears on the site: "Learn more about (the FDI Appeal) and what you can do to stop Iranian regime nuclear blackmail!" -- the exact same phrase expressed by George Bush on January 23, 2006.
So where does this so-called foundation get its money? According to the National Endowment for Democracy's website, the FDI received some funding from the National Endowment for Democracy
-- a nominally private project known for its subversion of elections in
Central and South America and its machinations in concert with the CIA
in various so-called popular movements in eastern Europe and the Middle
East. Despite high-sounding press releases that usually trumpet
beliefs in human rights and so on, the aforementioned "movements" are
usually led by men and women who want a piece of the resource pie in
whatever country their movement is in. Other FDI monies seem to
have come from private donations, including some from the organization
of Iranian exiles fronted by the former Shah's son. This group of
Iranians are interested in not only overthrowing the mullahs in Tehran,
they would like to see a reinstitution of the monarchy. For those
who are historically challenged, it was the excesses of the Shah's
regime that brought about the Iranian revolution in the first place.
there are a multitude of Iranian exile groups hoping to see the current
Iranian government fall, the FDI appears to be the only one that lists
no Iranians in its leadership. Indeed, Timmerman seems to be the
only person willing to publicly claim any connection to the
group. Knowing his rabid support of Tel Aviv's designs for the
Middle East and Gulf regions, it is fair to conclude that this group as
it currently exists is but a front for Israel's expansionist
plans. As for those other groups, Timmerman spends an inordinate
amount of time attacking one in particular -- the National Council for Resistance in Iran (NCRI) and its backers Mojahedin Khalq Organization
(MKO). As I have written before, this latter group has its roots
in the movement leading up to the 1979 revolution in Iran and was violently attacked by the Khomeini-led element in the civil battles that followed the Shah's overthrow.
Since then, the group has undergone some philosophical and personnel
changes that have provided its enemies with reasons to label it a cult and an enemy of the Iranian people.
In addition, NCRI's willingness to cultivate favor among certain
elements of the US right wing have made any support from the
progressive side of US politics lukewarm at best. In addition, some of its members have recently joined the call for sanctions against their country
-- a call that is hard to justify for most folks opposed to
Washington's plans for world domination, especially after the
experience of the Iraqi people under a similar embargo. However,
it is not my intention to explore the nature of the NCRI and MKO as
regards the charges against them here. I only mention them
because of the special venom with which Mr. Timmerman and his
foundation attack the two organizations. Most recently, Timmerman
wrote a piece that appeared in FrontPage Magazine attacking the group for its violent history and warning other neocons away from supporting the groups, saying: "When making a revolution, it is critical to choose one's allies well" (FrontPage Magazine, 19 January 2006).
The Intelligence Summit
are those fellow imperial cheerleaders with whom Mr. Timmerman wants to
make "revolution" on Iran? Perhaps another link on the FDI's
skeleton of a website can provide us with some clues. It is this
link that announces that the FDI is invited to speak at The
Intelligence Summit. This event, which is billed as "a
non-partisan, non-profit, neutral forum that uses private charitable
funds to bring together for the first time the intelligence agencies of
the free world and the emerging democracies," is taking place at the
Hyatt Hotel in Crystal City, Virginia over the weekend of February
17-20, 2006. The stated purpose of the summit is to provide
members of the intelligence, espionage, counter-terrorism, and
counter-intelligence agencies from the so-called free world an
opportunity to compare notes and develop strategies to stay in power
and defeat those that oppose them. The quasi-private nature of
the event appears to be merely a pretext for the individuals attending
to keep some kind of legal separation from any policy-making powers
they might have. In other words, as long as the event is
nominally unofficial, the attendees are free to make statements and
deals that they could not make in a more official arrangement.
The list of speakers and board members is almost one hundred names long
and includes such well known empire builders like former CIA Chief
James Woolsey; Washington insiders Michael Ledeen and Richard Perle;
and lesser known imperial cheerleaders such as Colonel Oded
Shoham of the Israel Defense Forces and retired US Army General
Paul Vallely, who currently provides analysis for FOXNews and has
decades of experience in military psy-ops and
counter-intelligence. Titles of the seminars include Business Intelligence in Latin America: The Case of Venezuela, Brazil, and Mexico, Eyewitness to Terror: Islam's Holy March Against The West, Identifying and Protecting Trade Secrets in Public, and Private Sector and Electronic Surveillance Systems.
summit's sponsors include various internet companies hoping to make a
buck off the growing market in homeland security and anti-hacking
technologies, as well as companies involved in private security
operations around the globe. The primary sponsor, however, is the
subject of controversy and is currently denied entry into the United
States because of his indictment on various charges in Russia and
Israel. His name is Michael Chernoff (or Cherney) of the Michael Cherney Foundation.
Cherney is well-known among supporters of Israel and has contributed
millions of dollars to various organizations on the right end of
Israel's political spectrum, as well as several thousands to the US
Republican Party. Cherney's sponsorship is obviously important to
the summit's organizers, as they are urging attendees to lobby the US
State Department and get Mr. Cherney a visa so he can accept an award
that weekend in February.
governments and organizations most of these people are connected to,
the intent of the military members, businessmen, spies, and their
apologists attending this summit is not democracy but the maintenance
and expansion of the US-Israel-Britain axis of greed. It's quite
unlikely that one would find much opposition to NSA-Pentagon
eavesdropping or Gitmo torture at the Crystal City Hyatt the weekend of
this conference. One gets the feeling that the attendees won't be
discussing multilateralism or transparency at this gathering.
Openness is not a priority among these folks.