November 5, 2005
Katherine Shrader,
writing for the Associated Press, makes note for Osama bin Laden’s
silence. "Since the 9/11 attacks, the longest bin Laden had gone
without issuing a new public statement—audio or video—was just over
nine months. He’s now let 10 months pass, and counting," explains the
corporate journo. Of course, this silence is normal—for a dead man. But
this fact will not stop "U.S. counterterrorism officials" from
declaring Osama is alive and up to his dirty tricks, as the exigencies
of state demand such in order for the "war against terrorism" to
continue. "The working assumption is that bin Laden is alive, even if
he isn’t churning out tapes," writes Shrader. "The terror leader is
believed to be hiding in a rugged area along the Afghan-Pakistani
border, where the government in Islamabad has little control and tribal
loyalties run deep."
Obviously, it is not so rugged as to
not provide the ailing "terror leader" access to a kidney dialysis
machine. But even if Osama is unable to cart a dialysis machine in by
way of pack animal, he can always hike over to Pakistan and get his
treatment, as he did on September 10, 2001, in Rawalpindi, as Dan Rather
reported. Prior to this, in July, Osama was ushered into the American
Hospital in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, for kidney dialysis treatment,
as the French daily newspaper Le Figaro reported in October, 2001.
"While he was hospitalized, bin Laden received visits from many members
of his family as well as prominent Saudis and Emiratis. During the
hospital stay, the local CIA agent, known to many in Dubai, was seen
taking the main elevator of the hospital to go to bin Laden’s hospital
room," Alexandra Richard
reported for Le Figaro. In the years since, this meeting with the CIA
has been meticulously characterized as an urban myth—not that it
matters, since most Americans are blissfully unaware of Osama’s long
and sordid collaboration with Pakistan’s ISI and the CIA.
As
well, most Americans are unaware of the fact Osama died from
complications associated to his illness. "A Pakistani newspaper Ausaf
published from Multan has reported that Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden
died four months ago in a village near Kandahar of severe illness," the
South Asia Network
reported. "According to the newspaper report, Bin Laden was campaigning
at Bamiyan, fell very ill, returned to Kandahar where he died and was
buried in the Shada graveyard in the shadow of a mountain…. Funeral
prayers have been said for Osama bin Laden over these years with one
reported now by the Ausaf, and another in an Egyptian newspaper Al Wafd
as far back as December 2001."
On December 26, 2001, the Egyptian newspaper al-Wafd reported:
A
prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement announced yesterday
the death of Osama bin Laden, the chief of al-Qa’da organization,
stating that bin Laden suffered serious complications in the lungs and
died a natural and quiet death. The official, who asked to remain
anonymous, stated to The Observer of Pakistan that he had himself
attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial in
Tora Bora 10 days ago. He mentioned that 30 of al-Qa’da fighters
attended the burial as well as members of his family and some friends
from the Taleban. In the farewell ceremony to his final rest guns were
fired in the air. The official stated that it is difficult to pinpoint
the burial location of bin Laden because according to the Wahhabi
tradition no mark is left by the grave. He stressed that it is unlikely
that the American forces would ever uncover any traces of bin Laden.
Nor do they want to "uncover any traces of bin Laden," who is a useful nemesis for never-ending invasions.
Moreover,
the corporate media, wedded to the neocon vision of total war and
interminable murder and terror, has likely dismissed the fact Bin Laden
is dead and buried—after all, Arabs did the reporting, not careerists
(or propagandists) at the Washington Post of the New York Times—and
instead expend countless column inches expounding on the whereabouts of
our Emmanuel Goldstein.
Ben Venzke, "chief executive at the
IntelCenter, a government contractor that does support work for the
intelligence community" (in other words, somebody who has a vested
interest in rendering Osama into a scary character in a George Romero
flick), "notes there could be a number of factors contributing to bin
Laden’s public silence. He may have decided to change the messenger.
His deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, has been much more vocal, issuing seven
messages this year. In years past, he and bin Laden have delivered
roughly the same number of messages." This is the same Ayman al-Zawahri
who joined the Muslim Brotherhood, a British intelligence and CIA
penetrated organization, and worked closely with the Maktab al-Khidamat
(MAK), or the Services Office, in Afghanistan (eventually to become
al-Qaeda), one of seven mujahedin factions "sponsored" by the CIA and
paid for with gobs of Saudi money. The leader of MAK was a Palestinian
Muslim Brotherhood adherent named Abdullah Azzam, often called the
"emir of the Arab mujaheddin." According to Jane’s Intelligence Review,
"Azzam is regarded as the historical leader of Hamas" and it is
well-documented that Hamas is basically a creation of Israeli
intelligence (see Richard Sale, Analysis: Hamas history tied to Israel; according to Zeev Sternell,
historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, "Israel thought that
it was a smart ploy to push the Islamists against the Palestinian
Liberation Organization). In short, the trail of al-Zawahri, Bin Laden,
and other so-called terrorists invariably leads back to intelligence
operations, as I have noted repeatedly on this site.
Instead
of admitting Bin Laden is dead (as Pakistan’s dictator, General Pervez
Musharraf, did in an interview with the Italian weekly magazine
Panorama in January, 2003) and thus we have not heard much from the
former CIA asset, Shrader tells us "the earthquake in Pakistan could
have inhibited bin Laden’s ability to transmit messages. Or a tape
could have been destroyed in the rubble." I tend to believe Osama was
abducted by aliens and was taken to a distant planet. No doubt Elvis
suffered a likewise fate.
"I don’t know where bin Laden is.
I have no idea and really don’t care. It’s not that important. It’s not
our priority," said Bush on March 13, 2002. Indeed, Osama is no longer
important and there are more scary bogeymen out there—for instance, Abu
Musab al-Zarqawi, the one-legged terrorist who kills hostages on
videotape and eludes capture, as do all hobgoblins who serve the
purpose of scaring little children and easily misled Americans. Even
so, we are told "Bin Laden also could be plotting an attack on the
United States and has made a strategic messaging decision to keep quiet
in the lead-up to the attack." However, as noted above, Osama is not
all that relevant, so we shouldn’t expect an attack—not one, anyway,
with his name attached. "President Bush rarely mentions bin Laden, who
has eluded U.S. capture despite being the most-sought terrorist in the
world. Bush did mention him by name in a series of speeches focused on
the war on terror last month."
Even so, "[h]alf of Americans
think it’s likely that the United States will capture or kill bin
Laden, a number that has moved little over the last three years,
according to a CNN-USA Today-Gallup poll." In other words, a large
percentage of Americans believe Osama is still alive, even with all the
evidence to the contrary (evidence not reported by the corporate media,
thus somewhere out beyond Pluto, since most Americans get their news
from the corporate media, or the Bush Ministry of Disinformation). In
fact, the vast majority of so-called "Muslim terrorism" is a creation
of American, British, and Israeli intelligence operations. Osama, dead
or alive, is irrelevant to the objectives of these terrorist
operations—in fact, he is but one character in a cast of stand-ins,
mostly patsies, dupes, crazies, and in the case of al-Zarqawi, almost
entirely mythical.
|