November 6, 2005
Just four days before the 2004 presidential election, a
prestigious British medical journal published the results of a rigorous
study by Dr. Les Roberts, a widely respected researcher. Roberts
concluded that close to 100,000 people had died in the invasion and
occupation of Iraq. Most were noncombatant civilians. Many were
But that news didn't make the front pages of the major newspapers. It
wasn't on the network news. So most voters knew little or nothing about
the brutal civilian impact of President George W. Bush's war when they
went to the polls.
That's just one of the big stories the mainstream news media ignored,
blacked out, or underreported over the past year, according to Project
Censored, a media watchdog group based at California's Sonoma State
Every year project researchers scour the media looking for news that
never really made the news, publishing the results in a book, this year
titled Censored 2006 .
Of course, as Project Censored staffers painstakingly explain every
year, their "censored" stories aren't literally censored, per se. Most
can be found on the Internet, if you know where to look. And some have
even received some ink in the mainstream press. "Censorship," explains
project director Peter Phillips, "is any interference with the free
flow of information in society." The stories highlighted by Project
Censored simply haven't received the kind of attention they warrant,
and therefore haven't made it into the greater public consciousness.
"If there were a real democratic press, these are the kind of stories
they would do," says Sut Jhally, professor of communications at the
University of Massachusetts and executive director of the Media
The stories the researchers identify involve corporate misdeeds and
governmental abuses that have been underreported if not altogether
ignored, says Jhally, who helped judge Project Censored's top picks.
For the most part, he adds, "stories that affect the powerful don't get
reported by the corporate media."
Can a story really be "censored" in the Internet age, when information
from millions of sources whips around the world in a matter of seconds?
When a single obscure journal article can be distributed and discussed
on hundreds of blogs and Web sites? When partisans from all sides
dissect the mainstream media on the Web every day? Absolutely, Jhally
"The Internet is a great place to go if you already know that the
mainstream media is heavily biased" and you actively search out sites
on the outer limits of the Web, he notes. "Otherwise, it's just another
place where they try to sell you stuff. The challenge for a democratic
society is how to get vital information not only at the margins but at
the center of our culture."
Not every article or source Project Censored has cited over the years
is completely credible; at least one this year is pretty shaky (see
Some stories get ignored by the mainstream media because they’re too
controversial, or too much of a challenge to the rich and powerful, or
just too hot to handle.
But some stories get dismissed because they’re just not
credible—and unfortunately, one of the pieces Project Censored cites
this year appears to fall into that category.
Almost everything on the Project Censored list is well sourced and, at
the very least, plausible. But one of the stories listed under
"Surveillance Society Quietly Moves In" is a piece titled "Where Big
Brother Snoops on Americans 24/7." Written by Teresa Hampton and Doug
Thompson, the piece was published on www.capitolhillblue.com, a
Virginia Web site that’s been around since 1994.
The piece makes some pretty spectacular allegations. Hampton and
Thompson claim not only that the Pentagon is defying Congress and
covertly operating the notorious Total Information Awareness program
(TIA) (which Congress explicitly killed), but also that the feds now
monitor "virtually every financial transaction of every American," in
real time (that is, as it’s happening). They also maintain that the
Pentagon uses the information to launch investigations of "persons of
interest" and as a basis for adding names to the Transportation
Security Administration’s "no fly" lists.
It’s pretty far-fetched to think that the Pentagon could run an
operation so vast as to review almost every financial transaction in
the country as it happens. But beyond that, the American Civil
Liberties Union has filed two suits against the feds trying to pinpoint
just how it collates TSA’s "no fly" lists and still hasn’t been able to
figure it out.
The principal sources Hampton and Thompson base their story on seem to
be an anonymous "security consultant who worked on the ... project" and
a person named "Allen Banks," who was identified simply as a "security
expert," without any detail as to who he is or how he would be privy to
Thompson, who is the site’s publisher, defended the accuracy of the
story, saying that he’d spoken with "over 30 sources" —police, banks,
credit card agencies—and that he reached his conclusions based on those
sources, as well as on the fact that there were "too many
coincidences." (None of that is explained in the story.) "To some
extent," he added, "it was a conclusion by me, looking at the links."
Banks and other private industries had been instructed to e-mail data
to the feds under TIA, and they continued sending data to the same
places after TIA was killed, because they never received orders to
stop, Thompson said. His caveat: "If I had to go into court and prove
this, there’s no way I could prove it." We’re still dubious.
But most of the stories that made the project's top 10 were published
by more reliable sources and included only verifiable information. And
Project Censored's overall findings provide valuable insights into the
kinds of issues the mainstream media should be paying closer attention
1 Bush Administration Moves to Eliminate Open Government
While the Bush administration has expanded its ability to keep tabs on
civilians, it's been working to make sure the public--and even
Congress--can't find out what the government is doing. One year ago,
Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) released an 81-page analysis of how the
administration has administered the country's major open government
laws. His report found that the feds consistently "narrowed the scope
and application" of the Freedom of Information Act, the Presidential
Records Act, and other key public information legislation, while
expanding laws blocking access to certain records--even creating new
categories of "protecteda' information and exempting entire departments
from public scrutiny.
When those methods haven't been enough, the Bush administration has
simply refused to release records--even when the requester was a
congressional subcommittee or the Government Accountability Office, the
study found. A few of the potentially incriminating documents Bush and
Co. have refused to hand over to their colleagues on Capitol Hill
include records of contacts between large energy companies and Vice
President Dick Cheney's energy task force; White House memos pertaining
to Saddam Hussein's, shall we say, "elusive" weapons of mass
destruction; and reports describing torture at Abu Ghraib.
The report's findings were so dramatic as to indicate "an unprecedented
assault on the laws that make our government open and accountable,"
Waxman said at a Sept. 14, 2004, press conference announcing the
Given the news media's intrinsic interest in safeguarding open
government laws, one would think it would be plenty motivated to
publicize such findings far and wide. However, most Americans remain
oblivious to just how much more secretive--and autocratic--our leaders
in the White House have become.
Source: "New Report Details Bush Administration Secrecy" press
release, Karen Lightfoot, Government Reform Minority Office, posted on
www.commondreams.org, Sept. 14, 2004.
2 Media Coverage Fails on Iraq: Fallujah and the Civilian Death Toll
Decades from now, the civilized world may well look back on the
assaults on Fallujah in April and November 2004 and point to them as
examples of the United States' and Britain's utter disregard for the
most basic wartime rules of engagement. Not long after the "coalition"
had embarked on its second offensive, UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights Louise Arbour called for an investigation into whether the
Americans and their allies had engaged in "the deliberate targeting of
civilians, indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks, the killing of
injured persons, and the use of human shields," among other possible
"grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions ... considered war crimes"
under federal law.
More than 83 percent of Fallujah's 300,000 residents fled the city,
Mary Trotochaud and Rick McDowell, staffers with the American Friends
Service Committee, reported in AFSC's Peacework magazine. Men between
the ages of 15 and 45 were refused safe passage, and all who
remained--about 50,000--were treated as enemy combatants, according to
Numerous sources reported that coalition forces cut off water and
electricity, seized the main hospital, shot at anyone who ventured out
into the open, executed families waving white flags while trying to
swim across the Euphrates or otherwise flee the city, shot at
ambulances, raided homes and killed people who didn't understand
English, rolled over injured people with tanks, and allowed corpses to
rot in the streets and be eaten by dogs.
Medical staff and others reported seeing people, dead and alive, with
melted faces and limbs, injuries consistent with the use of phosphorous
But you wouldn't know any of this unless you'd come across a rare
report by one of an even rarer number of independent journalists--or
known which obscure Web site to log onto for real information.
Of course, the media blackout extends far beyond Fallujah.
The U.S. military's refusal to keep an Iraqi death count has been
mirrored by the mainstream media, which systematically dodges the
question of how many Iraqi civilians have been killed.
Les Roberts, an investigator with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of
Public Health, conducted a rigorous inquiry into pre- and post-invasion
mortality in Iraq, sneaking into Iraq by lying flat on the bed of an
SUV and training observers on the scene. The results were published in
the Lancet ,
a prestigious peer-reviewed British medical journal, on Oct. 29,
2004--just four days prior to the U.S. presidential elections. Roberts
and his team (including researchers from Columbia University and from
Al-Mustansiriya University, in Baghdad) concluded that "the death toll
associated with the invasion and occupation of Iraq is probably about
100,000 people, and may be much higher."
The vast majority of those deaths resulted from violence--particularly
aerial bombardments--and more than half of the fatalities were women or
children, they found.
The State Department had relied heavily on studies by Roberts in the
past. And after Roberts, using similar techniques, calculated in 2000
that about 1.7 million had died in the Congo as the result of almost
two years of armed conflict, the news media picked up the story, and
the United Nations more than doubled its request for aid to the Congo,
and the United States pledged an additional $10 million.
This time, silence--interrupted only by the occasional critique
dismissing Roberts's report. The major television news shows, Project
Censored found, never mentioned it.
Sources: "The Invasion of Fallujah: A Study in the Subversion of
Truth," Mary Trotochaud and Rick McDowell, Peacework , Dec. 2004-Jan.
2005; "U.S. Media Applauds Destruction of Fallujah," David Walsh, www.wsws.org
(World Socialist Web site), Nov. 17, 2004; "Fallujah Refugees Tell of
Life and Death in the Kill Zone," Dahr Jamail, New Standard, Dec. 3,
2004; "Mortality before and after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq," Les
Roberts, Riyadh Lafta, Richard Garfield, Jamal Khudhairi, and Gilbert
Burnham, Lancet, Oct. 29, 2004; "The War in Iraq: Civilian Casualties,
Political Responsibilities," Richard Horton, Lancet, Oct. 29, 2004;
"Lost Count," Lila Guterman,Chronicle of Higher Education, Feb. 4,
2005; "CNN to Al Jazeera: Why Report Civilian Deaths?" Fairness and
Accuracy in Reporting, April 15, 2004, and Asheville Global Report,
April 22-28, 2004.
3 Another Year of Distorted Election Coverage
Last year Project Censored foretold the potential for electoral
wrongdoing in the 2004 presidential campaign: The "sale of electoral
politics" made No. 6 in the list of 2003-04's most underreported
stories. The mainstream media had largely ignored the evidence that
electronic voting machines were susceptible to tampering, as well as
political alliances between the machines' manufacturers and the
Republican Party. Then came Nov. 2, 2004.
Bush prevailed by 3 million votes--despite exit polls that clearly projected Kerry winning by a margin of 5 million.
"Exit polls are highly accurate," Steve Freeman, professor at the
University of Pennsylvania's Center for Organizational Dynamics, and
Temple University statistician Josh Mitteldorf wrote in In These Times.
"They remove most of the sources of potential polling error by
identifying actual voters and asking them immediately afterward who
they had voted for."
The 8-million-vote discrepancy was well beyond the poll's recognized,
less-than-1-percent margin of error. And when Freeman and Mitteldorf
analyzed the data collected by the two companies that conducted the
polls, they found concrete evidence of potential fraud in the official
"Only in precincts that used old-fashioned, hand-counted paper ballots
did the official count and the exit polls fall within the normal
sampling margin of error," they wrote. And "the discrepancy between the
exit polls and the official count was considerably greater in the
critical swing states."
Inconsistencies were so much more marked in African American
communities as to renew calls for racial equity in our voting system.
"It is now time to make counting that vote a right, not just casting
it, before Jim Crow rides again in the next election," wrote Rev. Jesse
Jackson and Greg Palast in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer .
Sources: "A Corrupt Election," Steve Freeman and Josh Mitteldorf, In
These Times, Feb. 15, 2005; "Jim Crow Returns to the Voting Booth,"
Greg Palast and Rev. Jesse Jackson, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Jan.
26, 2005; "How a Republican Election Supervisor Manipulated the 2004
Central Ohio Vote," Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman,
www.freepress.org, Nov. 23, 2004.
4 Surveillance Society Quietly Moves In
It's a well-known dirty trick in the halls of government: If you want
to pass unpopular legislation that you know won't stand up to scrutiny,
just wait until the public isn't looking. That's precisely what the
Bush administration did Dec. 13, 2003, the day American troops captured
Saddam Hussein. Bush celebrated the occasion by privately signing into
law the Intelligence Authorization Act--a controversial expansion of
the PATRIOT Act that included items culled from the "Domestic Security
Enhancement Act of 2003," a draft proposal that had been shelved due to
public outcry after being leaked.
Specifically, the IAA allows the government to obtain an individual's
financial records without a court order. The law also makes it illegal
for institutions to inform anyone that the government has requested
those records, or that information has been shared with the
"The law also broadens the definition of "financial institution' to
include insurance companies, travel and real-estate agencies,
stockbrokers, the U.S. Postal Service, jewelry stores, casinos,
airlines, car dealerships, and any other business "whose cash
transactions have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or
regulatory matters'" warned Nikki Swartz in the Information Management Journal .
According to Swartz, the definition is now so broad that it could
plausibly be used to access even school transcripts or medical records.
"In one fell swoop, this act has decimated our rights to privacy, due
process and freedom of speech," Anna Samson Miranda wrote in an article
magazine titled "Grave New World" that documented the ways in which the
government already employs high-tech, private industry, and everyday
citizens as part of a vast web of surveillance.
Miranda warned, "If we are too busy, distracted, or apathetic to fight
government and corporate surveillance and data collection, we will find
ourselves unable to go anywhere--whether down the street for a cup of
coffee or across the country for a protest --without being watched."
Sources: "PATRIOT Act's Reach Expanded Despite Part Being Struck
Down," Nikki Swartz, Information Management Journal, March/April 2004;
"Grave New World," Anna Samson Miranda, LiP, Winter 2004; "Where Big
Brother Snoops on Americans 24/7," Teresa Hampton and Doug Thompson,
www.capitolhillblue.com, June 7, 2004.
5 U.S. Uses Tsunami to Military Advantage in Southeast Asia
The American people reacted to the tsunami that hit the Indian Ocean
last December with an outpouring of compassion and private donations.
Across the nation, neighbors got together to collect food, clothing,
medicine and financial contributions. Schoolchildren completed class
projects to help the cause. Unfortunately, the U.S. government didn't
reflect the same level of altruism.
President Bush initially offered an embarrassingly low $15 million in
aid. More important, Project Censored found that the U.S. government
exploited the catastrophe to its own strategic advantage.
Establishing a stronger military presence in the area could help the
United States keep closer tabs on China--which, thanks to its
burgeoning economic and military muscle, has emerged as one of this
country's greatest potential rivals.
It could also fortify an important military launching ground
and help consolidate control over potentially lucrative trade routes.
The United States currently operates a base out of Diego Garcia--a
former British mandate in the Chagos Archipelago (about halfway between
Africa and Indonesia)--but the lease runs out in 2016. The isle is also
"remote and Washington is desperate for an alternative," veteran Indian
journalist Rahul Bedi wrote.
"Consequently, in the name of relief, the U.S. revived the Utapao
military base in Thailand it had used during the Vietnam War [and]
reactivated its military cooperation agreements with Thailand and the
Visiting Forces Agreement with the Philippines," Bedi reported.
Last February the State Department mended broken ties with the
notoriously vicious and corrupt Indonesian military--although human
rights observers charged the military with withholding "food and other
relief from civilians suspected of supporting the secessionist
insurgency, the Free Aceh Movement," Jim Lobe reported for the Inter
Sources: "U.S. Turns Tsunami into Military Strategy," Jane's Foreign
Report, Feb. 15, 2005; "U.S. Has Used Tsunami to Boost Aims in Stricken
Area," Rahul Bedi, Irish Times, Feb. 8, 2005; "Bush Uses Tsunami Aid to
Regain Foothold in Indonesia," Jim Lobe, Inter Press Service, Jan. 18,
6 The Real Oil-For-Food Scam
Last year, right-wingers in Congress began kicking up a fuss about how
the United Nations had allegedly allowed Saddam Hussein to rake in $10
billion in illegal cash through the Oil for Food program. Headlines
screamed scandal. New York Times
columnist William Safire referred to the alleged UN con game as "the
richest rip-off in world history." But those who knew how the program
had been set up and run--and under whose watch--were not swayed.
The initial accusations were based on a General Accounting Office
report released in April 2004 and were later bolstered by a more
detailed report commissioned by the CIA.
According to the GAO, Hussein smuggled $6 billion worth of oil out of
Iraq--most of it through the Persian Gulf. Yet the UN fleet charged
with intercepting any such smugglers was under direct command of
American officers, and consisted overwhelmingly of U.S. Navy ships. In
2001, for example, 90 of its vessels belonged to the United States,
while Britain contributed only four, Joy Gordon wrote in a December
2004 article for Harper's magazine.
Most of the oil that left Iraq by land did so through Jordan and
Turkey--with the approval of the United States. The first Bush
administration informally exempted Jordan from the ban on purchasing
Iraqi oil--an arrangement that provided Hussein with $4.4 billion over
10 years, according to the CIA's own findings. The United States later
allowed Iraq to leak another $710 million worth of oil through
Turkey--"all while U.S. planes enforcing no-fly zones flew overhead,"
Scott Ritter, a UN weapons inspector in Iraq during the first six years
of economic sanctions against the country, unearthed yet another scam:
The United States allegedly allowed an oil company run by Russian
foreign minister Yevgeny Primakov's sister to purchase cheap oil from
Iraq and resell it to U.S. companies at market value--purportedly
earning Hussein "hundreds of millions" more.
"It has been estimated that 80 percent of the oil illegally smuggled
out of Iraq under "oil for food' ended up in the United States," Ritter
wrote in the UK Independent .
Sources: "The UN Is Us: Exposing Saddam Hussein's Silent Partner,"
Joy Gordon, Harper's, December 2004; "The Oil for Food 'Scandal' Is a
Cynical Smokescreen," Scott Ritter, UK Independent, Dec. 12, 2004.
7 Journalists Face Unprecedented Dangers to Life and Livelihood
Last year was the deadliest year for reporters since the International
Federation of Journalists began keeping tabs in 1984. A total of 129
media workers lost their lives, and 49 of them--more than a third--were
killed in Iraq. In short, nonembedded journalists have now become
familiar victims of U.S. military actions abroad.
"As far as anyone has yet proved, no commanding officer ever ordered a
subordinate to fire on journalists as such," Weissman wrote in an
update for Censored 2006. But what can be shown is a pattern of tacit
complicity, side by side with a heavy-handed campaign to curb
journalists' right to roam freely.
The Pentagon has refused to implement basic safeguards to protect
journalists who aren't embedded with coalition forces, despite repeated
requests by Reuters and media advocacy organizations.
The U.S. military exonerated the army of any wrongdoing in its
now-infamous attack on the Palestine Hotel--which, as the Pentagon
knew, functioned as headquarters for about 100 media workers--when
coalition forces rolled into Baghdad on April 8, 2003.
To date, U.S. authorities have not disciplined a single officer or
soldier involved in the killing of a journalist, according to Project
Meanwhile, the interim government the United States installed in Iraq
raided and closed down Al-Jazeera's Baghdad offices almost as soon as
it took power and banned the network from doing any reporting in the
country. Last November, the interim government ordered news
organizations to "stick to the government line on the U.S.-led
offensive in Fallujah or face legal action," in an official command
sent out on interim prime minister Eyad Allawi's letterhead and quoted
in a November report by independent reporter Dahr Jamail.
And both American and interim government forces detained numerous
journalists in and around Fallujah that month, holding them for days.
Sources: "Dead Messengers: How the U.S. Military Threatens Journalists," Steve Weissman, www.truthout.org, Feb. 28, 2005; "Media Repression in 'Liberated' Land," Dahr Jamail, Inter Press Service, Nov. 18, 2004.
8 Iraqi Farmers Threatened by Bremer's Mandates
Historians believe it was in the "fertile crescent" of Mesopotamia,
where Iraq now lies, that humans first learned to farm. "It is here, in
around 8500 or 8000 B.C., that mankind first domesticated wheat, here
that agriculture was born," Jeremy Smith wrote in the Ecologist .
This entire time, "Iraqi farmers have been naturally selecting wheat
varieties that work best with their climate... and cross-pollinated
them with others with different strengths. "The U.S., however, has
decided that, despite 10,000 years practice, Iraqis don't know what
wheat works best in their own conditions."
Smith was referring to Order 81, one of 100 directives penned by L.
Paul Bremer III, the U.S. administrator in Iraq, and left as a legacy
by the American government when it transferred operations to interim
Iraqi authorities. The regulation sets criteria for the patenting of
seeds that can only be met by multinational companies like Monsanto or
Syngenta, and it grants the patent holder exclusive rights over every
aspect of all plant products yielded by those seeds. Because of
naturally occurring cross-pollination, the new scheme effectively
launches a process whereby Iraqi farmers will soon have to purchase
their seeds rather than using seeds saved from their own crops or
bought at the local market.
Native varieties will be replaced by foreign--and genetically
engineered--seeds, and Iraqi agriculture will become more vulnerable to
disease as biological diversity is lost.
Texas A&M University, which brags that its agriculture program is a
"world leader" in the use of biotechnology, has already embarked on a
$107 million project to "reeducate" Iraqi farmers to grow
industrial-sized harvests for export, using American seeds. And anyone
who's ever paid attention to how this has worked elsewhere in the
global South knows what comes next: Farmers will lose their lands, and
the country will lose its ability to feed itself, engendering poverty
On TomPaine.com, Greg
Palast identified Order 81 as one of several authored by Bremer that
fit nicely into the outlines of a U.S. "Economy Plan," a 101-page
blueprint for the economic makeover of Iraq, formulated with ample help
from corporate lobbyists. Palast reported that someone inside the State
Department leaked the plan to him a month prior to the invasion.
Smith put it simply: "The people whose forefathers first mastered the
domestication of wheat will now have to pay for the privilege of
growing it for someone else. And with that the world's oldest farming
heritage will become just another subsidiary link in the vast American
Sources: "Iraq's New Patent Law: A Declaration of War Against
Farmers," Focus on the Global South and Grain, Grain , October 2004;
"Adventure Capitalism," Greg Palast, www.tompaine.com,
Oct. 26, 2004; "U.S. Seeking to Totally Re-engineer Iraqi Traditional
Farming System into a U.S. Style Corporate Agribusiness," Jeremy Smith,
Ecologist, Feb. 4, 2005.
9 Iran's New Oil Trade System Challenges U.S. Currency
The Bush administration has been paying a lot more attention to Iran
recently. Part of that interest is clearly Iran's nuclear program--but
there may be more to the story. One bit of news that hasn't received
the public vetting it merits is Iran's declared intent to open an
international oil exchange market, or "bourse." Not only would the new
entity compete against the New York Mercantile Exchange and London's
International Petroleum Exchange (both owned by American corporations),
but it would also ignite international oil trading in euros.
"A shift away from U.S. dollars to euros in the oil market would cause
the demand for petrodollars to drop, perhaps causing the value of the
dollar to plummet," Brian Miller and Celeste Vogler of Project Censored
wrote in Censored 2006.
"Russia, Venezuela and some members of OPEC have expressed interest in
moving towards a petroeuro system," he said. And it isn't entirely
implausible that China, which is "the world's second largest holder of
U.S. currency reserves," might eventually follow suit.
Although China, as a major exporter of goods to the United States, has
a vested interest in helping shore up the American economy and has even
linked its own currency, the yuan, to the dollar, it has also become
increasingly dependent on Iranian oil and gas.
"Barring a U.S. attack, it appears imminent that Iran's euro-dominated
oil bourse will open in March, 2006," Miller and Vogler continued.
"Logically, the most appropriate U.S. strategy is compromise with the
EU and OPEC towards a dual-currency system for international oil
But you won't hear any discussion of that alternative on the six o'clock news.
Source: "Iran Next U.S. Target," William Clark, www.globalresearch.ca, Oct. 27, 2004.
10 Mountaintop Removal Threatens Ecosystem and Economy
On Aug. 15, environmental activists created a human blockade by locking
themselves to drilling equipment, obstructing the National Coal Corp.'s
access to a strip mine in the Appalachian mountains 40 miles north of
Knoxville. It was just the latest in a protracted campaign that
environmentalists say has national implications but that's been ignored
by the media outside the immediate area. Under contention is a
technique wherein entire mountaintops are removed using explosives to
access the coal underneath--a practice that is nothing short of
devastating for the local ecosystem, but which could become much more
As it stands, 93 new coal plants are in the works nationwide, according
to Project Censored's findings. "Areas incredibly rich in biodiversity
are being turned into the biological equivalent of parking lots," wrote
John Conner of the Katúah branch of Earth First!--which has been
throwing all its energies into direct action campaigns to block the
project--in Censored 2006. "It is the final solution for
Source: "See You in the Mountains: Katúah Earth First! Confronts
Mountaintop Removal," John Conner, Earth First!, November-December,
2004. This article is reprinted with permission from the San Francisco