Uruknet on Alexa
:: Segnala Uruknet agli amici. Clicka qui.
:: Invite your friends to Uruknet. Click here.
:: Segnalaci un articolo :: Tell us of an article
:: If you find this site informative, please donate -
every donation helps us keep up with costs. Thanks.
:: If you find this site informative, please donate -
every donation helps us keep up with costs. Thanks.
|
|
Speculations over US attack against Iran
Jürgen Gottschlich, Der Spiegel
![iran-target200[1].jpeg](pic.php?f=iran-target200[1].jpeg) | December 23, 2005
Are the USA planing a rocket attack against targets in Iran? In secret discussions Washington was preparing the Allies for appropriate air strikes in 2006, agencies disclosed to day. Especially in the NATO country Turkey, speculations about an attack against Iranian nuclear facilities are taking place.
Istanbul/Berlin - The News exploded like a Bomb in the tranquil prechristmas mood.:Washington was preparing close allies for air strikes against Iran. This was disseminated today by the German Depeschenservice in a text by the former "FAZ" editor - Head and Secret Service Expert Udo Ulfkotte - however substantial doubts on this matter are certainly justified.
As source given by the not undoubted journalist Ulfkotte "Western security circles" without naming specifics. According to his statements, CIA-Chief Porter Goss in the Turkish Capital Ankara asked M.P. Recep Tayyip Erdogan to support the air strikes against Iranian Nuclear and Military Installations especially with uninhibited exchange of secret information. At the present plan the attacks were planned for 2006.
In recent weeks The governments of Saudi-Arabia, Jordan, Oman and Pakistan have been informed about the implementations of military plans. The air strikes were described as "possible option" a specific point in time was however, not mentioned.
CIA Chief Gloss was now to have provided the Turkish Security Administration in Ankara with three information packages, one of which supposedly includes that Teheran cooperate with the terror organization Al-Qaida. A further transferred info pertains to the progress of the Iranian nuclear Armament, it was said. According to statements from German security agencies, in Ankara Goss assured the Turkish Government they would be informed a few hours before the possible Air Strike and to give Turkey already the green light for this particular day to attack depots of the separatist PKK on Iranian territory - a curious "Green Light" however, because the PKK does not maintain any military bases, but operates primarily in North Iraq.
The possible critical move in that situation - DDP reports - dependent mainly on the latest antisemitic outbursts of the Iranian president Mahmud Ahmadinedschad, whose scathing verbal attacks against Israel, prompted the American governments stronger impression, that Teheran would not yield in the nuclear - disagreement and were stalling for time. The News Agency cited a high ranking German Military official, anonymously: " I would not surprise me, if the Americans in short would not capitalize on the opportunity delivered by Teheran. The Americans would have to Attack Iran, before they have developed nuclear weapons. Afterwards it would be too late.
If US plans for attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities exist, or how detailed they are is hard to estimate. Last the American discovery annalist Seymour Hersh, reported about this in January 2005 in the "New Yorker" that secret US Commando Groups were active in marking military targets.
The Bush Government did not deny Hersh's report at that time. They only played it down: The article was full of "false statements" it was said in Washington. That the central issue in the report were false, was not disputed. Bush himself added explicitly, he didn't want to exclude the "War" option.
Air attack after New year?
Is a military action, possibly a war in the region about to happen? In Berlin the subject is moderated down. During the visit of defense minister Franz Josef Jung with Donald Rumsfeld this week in Washington, the possible Air Attack by the US on Iran did not come up as "a subject", a speaker for SPIEGEL ONLINE said.
However, the speculation on US attacks against Iran refers primarily to happenings in Turkey. Last week there was actually a mighty assembly of high ranking Security Personnel from the USA and from NATO in Ankara. Within a couple of days there was first the Chief of the FBI, then the Chief of the CIA and last the Secretary General Scheffer in Turkey. After her visit in Germany Coondoleezza Rize travelled to Turkey, too.
In fact Turkey's newspapers in connection with these visits have speculated too, that an attack on Iran was being prepared. But the assumptions in Turkey were not based on hard facts. Following the meeting of Porter Goss with Tayyip Erdogan the leftist Cumhuriyet headlined: "Now its Iran's turn". Substantiations: None.
The Paper noted, however, that the meeting between the CIA-Chief and Erdogan lasted unusually over an hour, even though Goss met beforehand with the Chief of the Turkish Secret Service. Because of that the Turkish public deducted that it had to be something very important - detailed facts: Wrong conclusion. Just about all media speculates over the possibility that Erdogan and Goss could have discussed a mutual action against the PKK in North Iraq. Possibly that Goss requested in exchange requested Turkish secret service photographs. A possible Air Attack on Iran would certainly not be staged from the Turkish base Incirlik, it is of course plausible that the USA informed Turkey, to test their reaction.
Ankara is skeptical. In the past the government in Ankara was skeptical concerning military actions by the USA to the point of directly opposed. An offensive by US ground troops in Northern Iraq against Saddam's Regime was even prevented by Ankara in 2003 - the lack of this second front was blamed by Donald Rumsfield over and over for military problems in Iraq.
Now the Turkish commander in chief and the probable future chief of staff Yasar Buyukanit both spent two weeks in Washington. Afterwards he commented that the relationship between the Turkish Army and the US Army were again excellent. This is therefore remarkable, because Buyukanit is one of the Hawks in the fight against the PKK and in the past had already considered, to himself march into North Iraq - in case the USA and the North Iraqi Kurds would not prevent the PKK from staging attacks against Turkey.
The Turkish - Iranian relations have been chilled for a long time. Teheran criticizes for years, that Turkey has good relations with Israel and is even cooperating with the Israeli Military. About the anti Israeli transgressions by Ahmadinedschad, Turkey was still not bombarded by the news media as it was the case in Germany - they just shook their head (shrugged their shoulder).
MP Erdogan has, however, just recently called his Israeli college Aril Sharon and congratulated him to his recovery - The long rather withheld contact by Erdogan with Sharon has in recently become much closer. Sharon had recently declared, if in doubt, he would go combat those in-love-with-nuclear Mullahs alone.
In spite of that The Turkish government spoke repeatedly against military action against Iran and Syria. Because at least with respect to the Kurdish question Turkey Syria and Iran are united, that there may not be an independent Kurdistan in northern Iraq. An alliance concerning these interests does not seem to exist between Washington and Ankara. However, if the USA plans a missile attack against Iran, Turkey must come aboard - active or passive.
But Erdogan and his military harbor the worst fear for the whole region, in case the USA would actually go against Iran. Western experts, too, consider the success of a military action against nuclear installations in Iran in no way guaranteed. Just the opposite: An attack would probably miss its aim to stop the nuclear program and provide Ahmadinedschad with even more supporters.
|
|
:: Article nr. 18970 sent on 25-dec-2005 01:02 ECT
www.uruknet.info?p=18970
Link: informationclearinghouse.info/article11373.htm
:: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website.
|
COMMENTS BY READERS OF URUKNET
The COMMENTs of our readers are the sole responsability of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of URUKNET. If you believe that any COMMENT contains pornographic, racist or otherwise objectionable or offensive content, or if the COMMENT is contrary to law in any way, please let us know. Our legal representatives will review any and all complaints and, if any complaint is deemed to be accurate, the COMMENT will removed at once.
Comments must be pertinent to the article and must not exceed 5000 characters.
To publish long comments, send it to the our Editor, it can become an article.
Do not complain to the Editor if you do not agree with an article or with a comment: simply reply here below.
You can get the password to become a REGISTERED USER and POST YOUR COMMENTS by clicking HERE (needed only once forever).
Click HERE to post your own comment. Now, also users not registered can post their comments.
| Comment pos ted: by dobermanmacleod on 25 Dec 2005 - 08:43 | Iran has specific military plans for automatic escalation if attacked. A divers e country with many ethnic groups, political beliefs, and religions, Iran will b e united by a preventative attack. Iran's nuclear program is diverse, resilent, and homegrown-any aerial attack would only temporarily retard it, not destroy i t. Finally, Iran is the second largest oil producer in the world, and has the military capacity to not only shut down the Strait of Humuth (or at least make tanker insurance prohibitively expensive), but to destroy other oil production in the Middle East (like Saudi, the first largest producer of oil).
My recommendation is not to launch a preventative aerial bombardment of Iran unl ess following it up with an invasion, which given the experience in Iraq would n eed too much manpower, military resources, and patients to succeed. |
| Comment pos ted: by dobermanmacleod on 25 Dec 2005 - 08:47 | Iran has specific military plans for automatic escalation if attacked. A divers e country with many ethnic groups, political beliefs, and religions, Iran will b e united by a preventative attack. Iran's nuclear program is diverse, resilent, and homegrown-any aerial attack would only temporarily retard it, not destroy i t. Finally, Iran is the second largest oil producer in the world, and has the military capacity to not only shut down the Strait of Humuth (or at least make tanker insurance prohibitively expensive), but to destroy other oil production in the Middle East (like Saudi, the first largest producer of oil).
My recommendation is not to launch a preventative aerial bombardment of Iran unl ess following it up with an invasion, which given the experience in Iraq, would need too much manpower, military resources, and patients to succeed. |
| Comment pos ted: by oldgurl1 on 25 Dec 2005 - 16:35 | | It is important to remember that the US has never attacked a country that can de fend itself. So if the word goes out that either US or the zionist entity airpla nes are on the way to Iran, look for another country to be hit (Syria?). "Ooops, we were on the way and the bombs accidently fell out" -or, in the case of missi le attack - "it unaccountably went off course. Sorry." |
| Comment pos ted: by oldgurl1 on 25 Dec 2005 - 18:08 | | Let us not forget that the US has never attacked a country that can defend itsel f. And the zionists will not attack Iran unless the US tells them to. I do not b elieve that Iran, or Syria for that matter, are not prepared to respond. And whe re will all the money come from to pay for the consequences? Let alone the polit ical fallout in the US? The Iranian president's remarks have not fallen on unsympathetic ears here. |
| Comment pos ted: by mhenriday on 26 Dec 2005 - 20:26 | It is more than interesting to note that no English translation of Herr Gottschl ich's article has been made available on <i>Spiegel</i>'s website, n or has it been sent out to subscribers to the journal's «international» (read : English-language/US ideology) newsletter. The original article is, however, avai lable to readers of German at the following URL : http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,392136,00.html |
|
[ Printable version
] | [ Send it to a friend ]
[ Contatto/Contact ] | [ Home Page ] | [Tutte le notizie/All news ]
|
|
Uruknet on Twitter
::
RSS updated to 2.0
:: English
:: Italiano
::
Uruknet for your mobile phone:
www.uruknet.mobi
The newsletter archive
|
:: If you find this site informative, please donate -
every donation helps us keep up with costs. Thanks.
|
:: All events
|