This headline "Six years of the US dwelling in Iraq" published on Russian Novosti Arabic-edition, it says the following: The U.S. still considers the possibility of dividing Iraq into three regions, the Kurds in northern Iraq, the Sunnis in the center and the Shiite in the South. Which means that the U.S. authorities unaware of the consequences, because such a division could cause political problems with neighboring countries....
[52848] |
Uruknet on Alexa
:: Segnala Uruknet agli amici. Clicka qui.
:: Invite your friends to Uruknet. Click here.
:: Segnalaci un articolo
:: Tell us of an article
:: If you find this site informative, please donate -
every donation helps us keep up with costs. Thanks.
:: If you find this site informative, please donate -
every donation helps us keep up with costs. Thanks.
|
|
Back to the old-new “three-regions” argument
Roads to Iraq
 |
March 23, 2009
This headline "Six years of the US dwelling in Iraq" published on Russian Novosti Arabic-edition, it says the following:
The U.S. still considers the possibility of dividing Iraq into three regions, the Kurds in northern Iraq, the Sunnis in the center and the Shiite in the South.
Which means that the U.S. authorities unaware of the consequences, because such a division could cause political problems with neighboring countries.
Since Maliki change his mind about his own reconciliation initiative (read Badger’s entry "News, and a question about JournoList", and see below also), I wonder if this "dividing Iraq" still an option!
Al-Qabas coverage of the impact of Obama’s message to Iran on Iraq says the following:
President Obama’s message to Iran showed that Iraqi politicians have not fully recovered from the sectarian deal which established the political process.
The Shiite political forces look at Obama’s move with high hopes, to bridge the US-Iranian relationship, and remove the concerns of the US bias to other forces, which benefit from the US – Iran confrontation relation.
The Sunnis rushed to express their concerns on the consequences this [US – Iran] relation improvement, and some officials described Obama’s message as an effort to revive the "new Middle East", which includes the new Iran, Israel and other countries in the region.
Khair Al-Din Haseeb is not only a writer, but he is the head of Al-Wahda study Center in Beirut. In his article "Iraq … to where?" (originally published on Al-Quds Al-Arabi):
The American problem in Iraq is the following:
1- A) They want to withdraw from Iraq saving face. B) They don’t want to leave chaos behind in Iraq.
2- The biggest US dilemma in Iraq is that there is no guarantee to achieve the "non-chaos" status in Iraq after the withdrawal.
The reconciliation
the conclusion of Iraqi writer Al-Alwaji published on Egyptian newspaper Al-Araby is: Maliki is not really serious in his reconciliation initiative. the writer listed the points saying that the Army is still based on sectarian motives, the "Justice and Accountability Committee" still exists, pressure from his Shiite allies …and many other reasons make Maliki’s call unrealistic.
|
|
:: Article nr. 52848 sent on 23-mar-2009 23:50 ECT
www.uruknet.info?p=52848
Link: www.roadstoiraq.com/2009/03/23/back-to-the-old-new-three-regions-argument/
:: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website.
|
COMMENTS BY READERS OF URUKNET
The COMMENTs of our readers are the sole responsability of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of URUKNET. If you believe that any COMMENT contains pornographic, racist or otherwise objectionable or offensive content, or if the COMMENT is contrary to law in any way, please let us know. Our legal representatives will review any and all complaints and, if any complaint is deemed to be accurate, the COMMENT will removed at once.
Comments must be pertinent to the article and must not exceed 5000 characters.
To publish long comments, send it to the our Editor, it can become an article.
Do not complain to the Editor if you do not agree with an article or with a comment: simply reply here below.
You can get the password to become a REGISTERED USER and POST YOUR COMMENTS by clicking HERE (needed only once forever).
Click HERE to post your own comment. Now, also users not registered can post their comments.
| Comment by layla anwar - 24 Mar 2009 - 03:25 [USER NOT REGISTERED] | okay, nothing new under the sun...Shiite iraq is sectarian in essence and it wil l continue to be used by the Americans and the Zionists until the partition is i n place...the only reason it did not take place geographically...as in delimited geographical statelets is because there has been a fierce RESISTANCE which the puppet maliki, the shiites in power, the kurds and the rest of the sell out junk from the iraqi scum like to call Insurgents. Borrowing names from their American masters.
It is so bloody obvious. Why can't anyone see it ?? |
| Comment by eyehateu2 - 24 Mar 2009 - 05:35 [USER NOT REGISTERED] | | Layla is correct,the only reason the internationalists(JEWS)zionists haven't yet broken down once great IRAQ,is due to the fact the nationalist armed Iraqi resi stance,has kept the dual occupation quite busy!!So,you see America and the trait orous allies thought this would be like Germany after the 2nd world war,BUT,the Germans after fighting 70 nations surrendered,IRAQ never capitulated(surrendered)!Although violence is lower currently,however it`s not over!The resistance has regrouped and once the (Awakening councils)don`t get there $300.00 monthly stipend,from puppet,sectarian,safavid,(Jawad)Nouri Kamel al-Malaki government,they`ll be back attacking the hated occupation and it`s debased tails!Iraq lost it`s greatest son 12-30-06,martyred leader President Saddam Hussien! Long live IRAQ!United & Free!Hail the IRAQI resistance! |
| Comment by nic - 25 Mar 2009 - 04:53 [USER NOT REGISTERED] | Christ Was Not A Jew
Jesus Christ Was Not A Jew: Does this shock you? We certainly hope it does. For it is time that Christians woke up to the fact that they have been brainwashed b y the Jews with the “big lie technique” to the falsehood that Christ was a Jew.
We ask you now, to set aside all prejudice in the matter and as God states in th e Bible, “Come let us reason together.” (Isaiah 1:18)
There are two ways that a person can be a Jew; racially (which means a cross bet ween the descendants of Esau and True Israelites ‑ There is Edom [Esau is called Edom in Genesis 36:8. And Edom is in ‘Modern Jewry’ Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41) or religiously. Let us now see whether Christ fits either of these categories.
Ninety‑five percent of the people that we know as Jews today, are mongrels ; they are a product of the amalgamation of many races. The majority of the Jews are Asiatics, of Mongolian, stock, the descendants of the tribes of Khazars of Russia who accepted Judaism in 740 A.D.
They are the descendants of Cain; No racial Jew is an Israelite. That’s right, w e repeat, NO RACIAL JEW IS AN ISRAELITE. The Bible itself identifies the Jews as the seed of Cain thereby identfying Satan as their father. (John 8:44)
Christ said to the Jews, in the 23rd chapter of Matthew, verses 33‑35: “Yo u serpents, you generation (race) of vipers, how can you escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore behold I send you a prophet, wise men and scribes and some of t hem you shall kill and crucify and some of them yuo shall scourge in your synago gues and persecute them from city to city that upon you may come all the righteous blood that has ever been shed upon the earth from the blood of righteous Abel” (Note that carefully).
Here Christ is saying to the Jews that they are guilty of the murder of Abel. Je sus could not have said this unless the Jews were/are the descendants of Cain. C hrist goes on to say: “Unto the blood of Zacharias, son of Brachias who you slew between the temple and the alter.” It’s very plan! And it’s in your Bible.
Christ said to the Jews “You are guilty of the death of righteous Abel because y ou rfather Cain murdered him.” It is also well for you to note here that Jesus f urther blames these Jews for all the deaths of righteous people from the beginni ng of time right down to this day. This is not a statement of man but of our Red eem, our King, our Savior.
Christ never lied and spoke only the truth; every word contained in the sixty 209;six books of the Bible is the Word of Almighty God. Are the Jews then God’s Chosen People as some “fogbound, lying, deceiving, Judeo‑Chrisian Clergy” would have us believe? Far from it! Rather than being God’s Chosen People, they are Satan’s Children! Let us turn for proof of this, to the eighth chapter of John the 42nd verse. The Jews have just said to Christ, we are God’s Chosen People, God is our Father. Christ did not answer the Jews the way ninety‑nine percent of our Judeo‑Christian preachers would do today. Rather, He said in the 42nd vers, “If God were your Father you would love me for I proceeded forth and came from God. Neitherdid I come of myself, but He sent Me. Why is it that you do not understand my speech. It is because yuo cannot hear my words.” (Read carefully the 44th verse) where Christ said to the Jews, “Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaks oa lie, he speaks of his own for he is a liar and the father of it.”
The Word “Jew”
A Jew is a person whose religion is Jew‑dah‑ism (Judaism). The word Jew is not found in the original texts of the Scriptures, but in many English Bi bles the word is an incorrect rendering of the latin word Judaeus, the Greek wor d Ioudaios, and the Hebrew word Yehudi. Although not found in either the Hebrew or the Greek Scriptures, the word Jew is an English rendering most often incorrectly translated from Yahudah, that is, referring to one belonging to one of the tribes of Israel (Yisrael) called Yahudah (Judah), a Yahudite. The word Jews, the plural of the word Jew, is incorrectly translated most often from the word Yahudim (descendants of the tribe of Yahudah).
The letter ‘J’ was not in general use until after the 17th century as used in ma ny Bibles for the word ‘Jew’ to substitute for the correct word Yahudite, or Yah udim. In some English Bibles we have received the word Juda, also an error in tr anslation because the word derives from the Greek Iudaios, which in the English would be Judaios. Judaios was none other then a Greek diety (see W.H. Roscher’s lexicon of mythology).
As used in the Scriptures, the word ‘Jew’ is sometimes translated to refer to a Yudean (Judean) a native or inhabitant (which includes many diverse races and pe ople groups living in the region) of Yudea (Judea). As the word |
| Comment by nic - 25 Mar 2009 - 04:55 [USER NOT REGISTERED] | he letter ‘J’ was not in general use until after the 17th century as used in man y Bibles for the word ‘Jew’ to substitute for the correct word Yahudite, or Yahu dim. In some English Bibles we have received the word Juda, also an error in tra nslation because the word derives from the Greek Iudaios, which in the English w ould be Judaios. Judaios was none other then a Greek diety (see W.H. Roscher’s lexicon of mythology).
As used in the Scriptures, the word ‘Jew’ is sometimes translated to refer to a Yudean (Judean) a native or inhabitant (which includes many diverse races and pe ople groups living in the region) of Yudea (Judea). As the word ‘American’ inclu des many diverse peoples living in the Country called ‘America’. The word very o ften refers to an advocate or adherent to the religion of the Yahudim, (Judaism), or it may in a few cases refer to a literal descendant of Abraham, Issac, Jacob/Israel, one of the descent of the tribe of Yahudah (Judah).
In present day generic usage, the word has no relationship to the Hebrew or the Greek translated words in the Old or New Covenant Scriptures, and is associated primarily through an adherent or advocate of Jew‑dah‑ism (Judaism) t he religion, but not through ethnics or race. Basically, a Jew is anyone who dec ides to call himself/herself a Jew. Within Jewish Circles, there are two other official ways one can become a Jew. One can be born from a mother who calls herself a Jew, or one can ‘convert’ to become a Jew. (A convert is called a ger which literally means stranger). Being born a Jew is pretty simple. If one’s mother is Jewish (of the Jewish religion) then he/she is considered a Jew, if one’s mother is not of the Jewish religion, then neither is the child officially a Jew. (It doesn’t matter what the father is).
Modern Jew‑dah‑ism began about 1000 AD, and is traced to Rabbenu Ger shon of Mainz, Germany the ‘Father’ of the Ashkenazi Jews, which constitute appr oximately 90% of the worlds Jews. Modern Jew‑dah‑ism is not the Scri ptural worship system of the Yahudim of the Scriptures.
Jews do not actively encourage conversion; to a large degree they discourage it. This is the reason Jews have never had missionaries trying to convert non‑ ;Jews. They want the convert but the convert must be 100% committed to being a J ew. Discouraging conversion helps to filter out those ‘lacking the proper degree ’ of commitment.
If the non‑Jew still wants to become a Jew, the male is circumcised. After he is healed, he immerses himself in a mikva. A mikva is a special pool of wate r which is used for many religious purposes in the religion of the Jews. (It mus t be made according to very specific rules). A female convert only has to immers e herself.
The term ‘Jew’, has come to be used synonymous with the term ‘Israel, Israelite’ , however, this is error. Scriptural Israelites were never called Jews, (Yahudim ), unless they were so associated by their religion. Most modern Jews are not of the tribe of Yahudah (Judah), and are not ‘Israelites.’ They are called Jew(s) because of their religion, Jew‑dah‑ism (Judaism). |
| Comment by nic - 25 Mar 2009 - 04:55 [USER NOT REGISTERED] | Jew, Ashkenazi (Franco‑German, Eastern and Central European Jews)
After the Northern Kingdom of Israel was conquered by the Assyrian King Shalmane ser V, in 745‑722 BCE, (for their sin before Yahweh), the Israelites were exiled into (Assyria), 2 Kings 17:5‑7. They prospered during the years in Assyria, and became a huge number of people. Outgrowing the land area they event ually migrated North through the ‘Caucasus Mountains’, and into central and Western Europe forming the European Nations, and are known as Caucasians ‘whites.’ As these Israelites migrated they influenced many people groups, no longer having an organized religious priesthood, and not having a nation or national identity, these migrating people, descendants of Jacob/Israel nevertheless passed on their bits and pieces of the ancient Scriptural worship system which was corrupted through their many years of captive living in pagan Assyria. During the 7th century A.D. these bits and pieces of the corrupt worship system became a form of Jew‑dah‑ism and was embraced by the Khazar King, his court, and the Khazar military class, who are descendants of Ashkenaz. This new religion of Jew‑dah‑ism, became the religion of the Khazars, and forms most of modern cultic European Jewry.
In common parlance the present day ‘Jew’ is synonymous with the ‘Ashkenazi Khaza r Jew’. Scripture refers to the Ashkenaz in Gen. 10:3, and in I Chron. 1:6, as o ne of the sons of Gomer, who was a son of Japheth, son of Noah. Ashkenaz is also a brother of Togarmah (and a nephew of Magog) who the Kazars, according to King Joseph, (of the Kazars) claimed as their ancestor. The people who refer to themselves as Ashkenazi Jews are not Israelites, and they are not Semites because they do not descend from Noah’s son Shem. They are Ashkenazi Khazar Jews, who descend from Noah’s son Japheth. Approximately 85‑90 percent of the Jews in the world call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.
Present‑day Jew‑dah‑ism, was formally formed into it’s basic c ultic form about 1,000 years ago, (according to the Jews), when ‑ Rabbenu Gershon of Mainz, Germany, published a ban on bigamy. This marks the recorded be ginning of the Ashkenazi Jews*, and Franco‑German halachic** creativity. T he word ‘Ashkenazi’ is not Hebrew for the word Germany, although the name has become ‘associated’ with Germany because many Ashkenazi Jews organized in Russia, Eastern Europe and Western Mongolia. |
| Comment by nic - 25 Mar 2009 - 04:56 [USER NOT REGISTERED] | Jew, Sephardim (Spanish Jews)
After the Northern Kingdom of Israel was conquered by the Assyrian King Shalmane ser V, in 745‑722 BCE, (for their sin before Yahweh), The Israelites were exiled into (Assyria), 2 Kings 17:5‑7. The King then imported people group s from his country (Assyria) to replace the exiled Israelites to maintain and co ntrol the land of the exiles. The Sepharvaim were one of these people groups, along with Cuthahites, Arrahites, 2 Kings 17:24. They mingled with each other, along with Edomites, who had migrated Northward from Idumea (field of Edom), after Israel and the Yahudim (Judeans) were exiled. Adad and Anu were ancient gods of Babylonia and were also the gods of these pagan Sepharvaim people. The Sephardim Yudeans (Judeans) are a mongrel people whose descent is directly from a mixture of this Assyrian people group and the remnant of escaped Yudeans (Judeans) along with Edomites who had migrated into the land originally occupied by the Kingdom of Israel and the kingdom of Yahudah (Judah). This made their religion also of mixed character, 2 Kings 17:24‑41.
The people known as “Spanish Jews,” are descended from the Canaanites, the peopl e who colonized Carthage. Following its sack by Rome, they adopted this Sepharva im, or Sephardim name for deceptive purposes and constitute 5% of world Jewry to day. The Sephardim Jews speak Latino, a mixture of Spanish and Hebrew. The Sepha rdim Jews migrated West through Egypt, then North into Spain from Judea and Samaria before, during, and after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 CE,. This migration became known as the “Jewish ‘Sephardim’ Diaspora”. Today, these Sephardim Jews are still using their ancient adopted name Sephardim (the spelling is a transliteration into English and not of significance). They settled in Spain, Portugal, the Eastern Mediterranean, Italy, the Balkans, Salonica and Macedonia, eventually emigrating into France and England, and Western Europe.
The Sepharviam Yudeans (Judeans) were known as Samaritans during the time of Mes siah, because they were living in Samaria, which was the area from which Israel was removed by the Assyrian King Shalmaneser V. The twelve apostles during the t ime if Messiah, were instructed not to enter the cities of the Samaritans, Matt. 10:5. Although the True Israelites of tribal descent, living in Samaria did received the witness of Yahshua and the message of redemption from the apostles, Acts, 1:8. Some of the mixed Samaritans also became proselytes to the Christian faith, Acts 8:4‑25.
The Sephardim Jews, (or Sepharviam Jews) are not of Israelite blood; they are no t of the tribe of Yahudah although they were called Yudeans, ‘Judeans’, as an in habitant, i.e. person living in the land originally occupied by the tribe of Yah udah of Israel). Their descent is mixed from Edom/Esau Canaanite stock. The Seph ardim Jews, like the Ashkenazi Khazar Jews are not a Semitic people. The word Sephardim is not a Hebrew word for Spain, although the name has become ‘associated’ with Spain because many Sephardim Jews organized in Spain. |
|
[ Printable version
] | [ Send it to a friend ]
[ Contatto/Contact ] | [ Home Page ] | [Tutte le notizie/All news ]
|
|
Uruknet on Twitter
::
RSS updated to 2.0
:: English
:: Italiano
::
Uruknet for your mobile phone:
www.uruknet.mobi
The newsletter archive
|
:: If you find this site informative, please donate -
every donation helps us keep up with costs. Thanks.
|
:: All events
|
