March 6, 2011
Israel’s continued colonization of what remains of historic Palestine
makes a Palestinian state nonviable. The PLO’s early dream of seeing a
bi-national secular, democratic Palestine collided with Zionist racism,
which has always has chosen in favor of conquest and the exclusion of
Palestinians. From there, the Zionists used the colonies to deplete
resources and bring Jews into the conquered areas---in sum, putting the
Jewish State of Israel ahead of any other consideration, which also makes
the possibility of a circumscribed Palestinian state in the West Bank and
Gaza unrealistic.
In 1988 in Algiers the PLO recognized Israel. Israel later recognized the
PLO but not Palestine. For that reason, the Conference of Madrid and the
Oslo Accords were done in bad faith, on Israel’s part. Before that, in
between, and afterwards the settlements have continued, along with other
attributes of Zionism. The same has happened with governments of
Likud-labour Party members (of the Socialist International, the same that
welcomed the party of Ben Ali, of Tunisia, by the way), Kadima or whatever
they are. Also with Bush, Clinton, Bush Jr. and Obama. With the PLO of
1988, after the elections of Arafat and Abud Abbas or during the current
period of decay. And also with Felipe Gonzalez, Aznar or Zapatero, Delors,
Santer, Prodi, Barroso…
Of course, some of responsibility for this vacuum lies with the PLO and
the Palestinian Authority’s own leaders, mainly those affiliated with Al
Fatah, and also with the rest of the organizations that did not secure
democratic structures representing the totality of the Palestinian people.
At a minimum, the Palestinian insistence to not continue negotiations on
an unending, continually revised "Peace Process " if colonization deepens
with new settlements and extension of the Wall in the West Bank, helps to
reveal the actual state of the situation. Europe, the United States,
Russia, the United Nations, the Quartet, and the godfathers of Annapolis
remain silent. Israel builds new settlements or extends previous ones,
simultaneously, with the evacuation and expulsion of Palestinian residents
of Jerusalem and other places. The Palestine Authority has effectively
built its own wall, while the sword of Israeli Zionism advances. And those
of Obama, Alston Ashton and others remain as portrayed…
These days, public opinion, although mostly bored with an unending
conflict, is assaulted by the events that exhaust headlines daily, making
people forget the previous day’s news, and one goes from the refrain that
negotiations exist (thanks to the deceit of friendly mass media of the
status quo and western values) for which there is a Peace Process, to the
knowledge that Israel, as always, (governed by one Zionist government or
another) continues making conquest and expulsion its hallmarks of
identity.
This perspective has made Palestinian overseers look for a third way that
allows them to not "leave the table of negotiations" (that do not exist),
to continue maintaining the farce that Israel wants and the Quartet fronts
for, that is to say that yes, that no, that I will not meet, now the prime
minister of the West Bank Fayyad meets with some Israeli, but without
ruining the playing cards and revealing that the Palestine Authority is an
empty shell that controls the police - when desired – of the Palestinian
Bantustans, while at the same time keeping with a diplomatic strategy
consisting of requesting the recognition of Palestinian State, if
possible, within the borders of the 1967 cease-fire, which are different
and smaller than those that determined the partition of the historical
Palestine of 1947.
This tactic has seen a little bit of success. It symbolically reinforces
the Palestine Authority and points to the Israeli occupation as the
problem. The initiators of recognition of a Palestinian state were the
Latin-Americans republics, beginning with Brazil, an actor that has
entered on the international scene, is in the G-20, aspires to be a
permanent member of the UN Security Council and has made other
international movements of international autonomy like the Turkish
Brazilian plan and the pursuit of the Iranian nuclear industry.
Recognition of a Palestinian State has been accepted with a cadence that
had an informative continuity: Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Chile -
without mentioning the borders …
The intention is to surpass the UN Security Council, in which there is
fear of a veto by the United States and a rubber-stamping by the other
Quartet members, and then go to the United Nations General Assembly in
order to isolate Israel.
That is where the Palestinian tactic has its greatest problem. On November
15, 1988, when the PLO Congress of Algiers recognized Israel, 104 States
recognized Palestine. Israel and the hypocrisy in the majority of those
104 governments (and the rest that did not do it) have achieved a
"normalization" by making the occupation that Palestinians are subjected
to compatible with an increase of those same governments’ relations with
Israel and treatment of Israel as a "normal" state.
The same nations of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay (new
recognizers of a Palestine State) have signed an agreement with Israel
through Mercosur, which accepts the application of the "internal"
legislation of each State in determining the origin of products. And that
is actually nothing symbolic, except to accept the colonies.
Spain has elevated the rank of the Palestinian diplomat. But Spain’s
normalization with Israel, in the sense that we noted above, is lubricated by the
budgetary arm of the Sefarad House of Israel, the agreement in which
Israel enters the OECD or the CERN, selling or buying arms and other
military agreements, avoiding the international reports of its own
diplomats or modifying the norms of universal jurisdiction to prevent
processes regarding crimes against humanity, not protesting to Israel
about the damages caused to its donations (the airport of Gaza, for
example) or accepting that Israeli colonization is an element that
disturbs ' negotiations' without taking a position as to how it affects
their relations, camouflaging its cynicism and hypocrisy (as other states
do) in which Israeli-Palestinian negotiations exist, and rejecting the
fact that these are only an alibi to continue advancing colonization,
while a Palestine elite camouflages its own impotence and well-being.
So, without diminishing the good news that there are governments that
indicate what is obvious---that a Palestinian State should exist and that
the marking of the 1967 borders would give it a minimum viability, civil
society must ask for coherence in their governments in commercial,
military, scientific, sport matters, preventing that an occupying state
like Israel be treated as "normal." The Campaign of Boycott,
Disinvestments and Sanctions, in the pattern of the struggle against
racist South Africa is adequate. Not to buy Israeli products, to isolate
Israel economically or in another areas is an adequate mechanism such that
a catharsis in a society like that of Israel, that does not recognize the
other---the Palestinian and his suffering, will take place.
Recognition of a virtual Palestinian State that only exists in Facebook
does not worry Israel. If what is demanded, in practical terms, were the
respect of the international rights, it would be the end of the
occupation. And, yes, that is the objective.
|