'Coincidence theorists' say nothing to worry
about, go back to sleep
Paul Joseph
Watson/Prison Planet | July
23 2005
A firestorm erupted amongst alternative
media after this website first
highlighted the inconceivable coincidence of Visor Consultants
holding an exercise which centered around bombs exploding in the exact
areas and at the same time as happened during the real 7/7 London Underground
attack.
However, no mainstream media has reported
on this massive story, instead focusing on drills that had taken place
months and years before the actual event.
Until now.
British Channel 4 News has produced
a
special report which whitewashes the entire affair
as one big coincidence and attacks this website for even questioning
the unusual nature of the concurrent exercises and attacks on 7/7.
Before we offer a rebuttal to the
perspective of the report, it's interesting to relate the reaction of
Visor managing director when he was questioned as to the lack of mainstream
media coverage on this issue.
Colman Jones, an Associate Producer
on CBS:Sunday Night, met Power at a conference on disaster management
in Toronto. As they were leaving the building he enquired of Power 'why
there had not been more media coverage of this.' 'They were trying to
keep it quiet,' Power purportedly responded, with what Jones called
'a knowing smile.'
Who is trying to keep it quiet? If
this is all just hot air as Channel 4 later go on to claim, then why
is it being kept secret? Why hasn't Power even revealed the name of
the company he was running the drill for?
Quoting from the Channel 4 report,
Visor's crisis team, Power explained,
were planning to practice the switch from what he called 'slow time'
thinking to the 'quick time' thinking required by a crisis situation.
In the event, they were forced to do so for real. 'Unusual though it
may be to stop an exercise and go into real time,' he comments, 'it
worked very well - although there were a few seconds when the audience
didn't realise whether it was real or not.'
After quoting our report and Al Jazeera
(who the Channel 4 writer JJ King failed to notice had just copied our
article wholesale and claimed it as their own), Channel 4 claim that
this website engaged in 'careless speculation' in that we failed to
contact Visor.
All we were doing is drawing attention
to the comments that Power had made on both BBC
Radio 5 and ITN
News. Furthermore, Power refused to respond to anyone who
wasn't what he called 'accredited media' - and just sent the same template
stock e mail out to anyone who enquired about the drill.
Channel 4 and JJ King then state,
In fact, the 'exercises' he spoke
of on Five Live were carried out purely 'on paper', or at least PowerPoint,
by a small group of seven or eight executives (Power remains tight-lipped
about the client) seeking to examine the impact on corporate decision-making
of a potential crisis situation.
OK, let's take a step back here.
Channel 4 quoted Power earlier as
saying that when the real attack began, th exercise switched from 'slow
time' to 'quick time' thinking and that Visor stopped the exercise and
went into 'real time'. This, coupled with comments previously made by
Power, suggests that Visor had some kind of actie role in the command
structure in dealing with the management of the crisis, the real attack.
How can the exercise have just been paper based when Visor started managing
the real attack, not the scripted one, after it happened.
Even putting this aside for a moment,
the drill need not have any link whatsoever to the attack as it unfolded,
but still could have been cited by the government as a fallback excuse
had any of their operatives been caught in the act of facilitating the
bombings. This was the point of our original article and we made it
clear that Visor and Peter Power could have been completely unwitting
dupes in this process. In fact that would have been the favourable because
it reduces the chance of good people stepping forward and blowing the
whistle.
In the light of a brief interview
with Power, the 'unbelievable' coincidence of events suddenly seems
entirely comprehensible: the train stations targeted, after all, were
all in central London -- any planner would pick these amongst a list
of possible targets.
Take a look
at a map of the tube stations. Factor in the amount of
different stations with the fact that the exercises targeted the exact
same stations at the exact same time as the real event happened.
Then consider the fact that the exercises
planned simultaneous bombs going off in different stations. The fact
that the 7/7 attacks were simultaneous bombs only emerged two days after
the event, making the coincidence theory even less plausible.
One individual calculated
the likelihood of this being just a coincidence. The odds
were one in 3,715,592,613,265,750,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. This
is obviously a figure open to conjecture but it gives you an idea of
the ballpark improbability we are talking about.
Channel 4 cite poison gas attack drills
on the Underground and a BBC documentary which dramatised an attack
on the Underground as proof that the Visor drill was very much part
of a trend and nothing more than a coincidence. This misses the point
entirely.
Again we have to repeat, the key elements
of the Visor drill are that the exact same locations were targeted at
the exact same time as the real attack. This is beyond coincidence.
We are aware that there were other drills and the mainstream media has
covered them over and over again. Why haven't they covered this one?
Channel 4 conclude their whitewash
piece by questioning this website's 'journalistic nous'.
This is pretty rich coming from a
mainstream media that for example takes Al-Qaeda responsibility claims
as gospel even if there's no evidence the group exists.
Yesterday Sky News carried the headline
'Group Claims Bombings' - in relation to the failed attacks on Thursday.
The group in question was Abu Hafs
al Masri Brigade. Previous investigations by the Boston
Globe and others concur that this group doesn't exist and
is likely to be one man sat at a computer.
So how can Sky News might as well
have reported that Intergalactic Imperial Reptoids claimed responsibility
for the attack, and yet it is the alternative media that consistently
gets lambasted for bad journalism?
The tide is turning, newspaper sales
are down, TV news viewers are falling. The mainstream media has lost
all credibility and people are turning to those who actively seek the
truth rather than actively seek to suppress it.
Even in the face of this barrage from
both sloppily researched 'special reports' and government hackers trying
to shut our websites down, we will continue to cover the events in London
with a skeptical eye. In fact the more we are attacked, the more we
will re-double our efforts to reach more people.
The truth will always triumph over
the scoffing sardonic whims of establishment media news whores.
Related:
London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real
Attack
New
Developments In London Underground Exercise Story
|