September 21, 2005
I'm now hearing that the investigation may be inching closer to never-confirmed UN Ambassador John Bolton.
According to two sources, Bolton's former chief of staff, Fred Fleitz,
was at least one of the sources of the classified information about
Valerie Plame that flowed through the Bush administration and
eventually made its way into Bob Novak's now infamous column.
After delving into Fleitz, I can safely report that he is, at a minimum, a very interesting character.
He is a career CIA agent who Bolton handpicked to join him at Foggy
Bottom, having gotten to know him during the administration of the
first President Bush. While working as Bolton's top aide, Fleitz also
continued his work in the CIA's WINPAC division, the group responsible
for some of the worst prewar intelligence on Iraq (they were, among
other things, big fans of Curveball and had "high confidence" in the presence of WMD in Iraq).
"I perform liaison function for the [CIA] and Mr. Bolton," Fleitz told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in April 2005
[pdf]. What he would have said if he'd been given truth serum is: "I've
kept my CIA portfolio, which made it easier to become an
intel-gathering machine for Bolton, who in turn was Cheney's
spear-carrier in the State Department -- working tirelessly to
undermine Powell and Armitage while, at the same time, feeding the
intel to Miller and the New York Times."
Over the years, Fleitz earned a reputation as Bolton's chief enforcer,
a swashbuckler willing to go the extra mile to make the intel fit the
desired policy -- even if it meant knocking a few heads. And his dual
role (serving what he called his
"two bosses") put him in the position to pick up -- and deliver to
Bolton -- all kinds of information… including, perhaps, the spousal
standing of a certain CIA analyst named Valerie. Even though Plame was
in operations and Fleitz was in WINPAC, he obviously was in a position
to know.
So when Joe Wilson started making a stink about faulty intel, you can bet that those whose raison d'etre
had been spreading faulty intel would move mountains to discredit him.
This is a key point because, in the end, Plamegate isn't about the
outing of Valerie Plame or the sliming of Joe Wilson. It's about Iraq
and the White House's attempt to slam the door on questions about the
corrupted intelligence that was used to lead us into a disastrous war.
Intel that Fleitz and Bolton played a key role in shaping.
So what does this all mean to the ongoing Plamegate investigation?
Well, another source close to Bolton recently described his management
style to me as "Very hands on. Nothing goes by him. His staff does what
he wants. He's not the kind of guy to have his staffers freelancing."
So, if Fleitz was a key source of the Plame info and Bolton is not the
kind of guy to have his staffers freelancing… does this mean Bolton was
being less than forthcoming when he told people around him that the
first time he ever heard Valerie Plame's name was when he read it in
the newspaper? Or was he merely sharing talking points with Tim Russert?
So could Ambassador Bolton actually be a target of Pat Fitzgerald's
investigation? When considering this question, it's important to keep
in mind that he's never been subpoenaed or questioned by the Plamegate
grand jury -- and, as a lawyer who does work for the New York Times put it: "The target of a grand jury investigation would not ordinarily be subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury."
So here is what we know: We know that Fleitz was the connection to the
CIA, and that Bolton was close to Scooter Libby (and the rest of the
neocons, of course) and Judy Miller (for whom he was an important source,
although the last time she quoted him by name was in 1999 when he was
at the American Enterprise Institute). And here is what we don't know:
we don't know the pathway through which Plame's identity got into
Novak's column. Did Miller learn about Plame from her old chum Bolton?
Did she pass that info on to Libby? Or had Bolton already told Libby?
And Rove? Or was it all just passed around and around in a cozy game of
neocon phone tag? It makes one wonder more than ever before what Bolton
and Miller talked about when he visited her in jail.
Meanwhile the New York Times continues to churn out ever more desperate and illogical "free Judy" editorials. Monday's was a particularly shameful attempt
to link the jailing of Miller (who could go free the second she agrees
to stop covering for her administration pals -- or her own rear end) to
that of Chinese journalist Zhao Yan (who isn't even sure why he's been
in jail for the last year, or whether he'll ever be freed or tortured
or executed). The Times' pallid disclaimer, "We are not
suggesting that the American justice system can be compared to
China's," is an additional disgrace, since the entire editorial is
based on doing just that. C'mon, guys, if you are going to use specious
reasoning, at least don't compound it by being disingenuous too.
Here's a suggestion: before you write another overwrought Judy editorial, how about writing one explaining what happened to the in-house Times investigation
into Miller's connection to Plamegate (which sources tell me has been
stopped). Or one reporting the fact that Judy is negotiating with
Fitzgerald and may be facing criminal contempt charges.
These are stories that deserve some space, don't you think? At least as much as last week's surprisingly upbeat story on John Bolton.
|
