September 22, 2005
The tour around the country by Cindy Sheehan, a teem of veterans, and
family members of veterans is covering lots of ground in 21 days (http://www.bringthemhomenowtour.org/). On
Sunday, they spoke in Boston, Providence, New Haven, and
NYC. In New Haven, we had a crowd of over 1000 (largest
ever for an anti-war rally here). Now hundreds of thousands
will converge on Washington DC this weekend to expose government lies
and demand money for jobs and education not for wars and
occupations. Like local events, many speakers will draw the
links between Iraq and Palestine (e.g. >$250 billion to Israel. 200
billion to Iraq) and some side events will relate to
Palestine*. Some will not like even these moderate
connections. But some will especially react strongly if
there is any mention of the organic links between the war on Iraq and
the war on Palestine.
To me the most interesting misinformation disseminated both among some
in the left and the right is that US foreign policy in Iraq and in
supporting Israel’s destruction of Palestine are merely related to US
"strategic interests." They may differ in their formulation of the main
US "interests", but you hear the same argument from leftists like Noam
Chomsky and Stephen Zunes and rightists like Paul Wolfowitz and Richard
Perle. This mistaken notion in fact was pushed and
articulated by the Israeli lobby and Israeli apologists in the media
for decades well before neocons and some leftists adopted
it. The Israeli lobby in Washington was never monolithic and
new that to be effective it had to get into both major parties in the
US. The lobby knew that the best way to advance closer
working relationship with the right would be that Israel is a good and
willing "tool" for advancing US interests. Such a
formulation helps deflect criticism from patriotic Americans who worry
about the growing influence of this lobby. On the other
side, left leaning Zionists wanted to work with a democratic left that
occasionally complained about "US Imperialism" and corporate
interests. In that case, it was easier to claim Israel helps
US public interests or that Israel is a democratic
ally. When push comes to shove, even Zionists on the left
would deflect any critique of the Zionist lobby claiming that criticism
should be solely directed to the masters (corporate or other elites)
who merely "use" Israel as a tool.
Senator Fullbright, Congressman Paul Findley, Jesse Jackson, Admiral
Moorer, Jeff Blankfort, Alison Weir, and hundreds of others have
articulated in books and articles why the Israeli lobby’s formulation
(whether cast in left or right angles) is at best misleading and at
worse false and dangerous. Clearly, those conscientious
critics come at it from very different angles. Some argued
that elites and those in power in the US can and have used Israel
occasionally as a gopher but that this was a net loss for US elite
interests. Israel’s role as intermediary in the Iran Contra
scandal is now well known even though at the time, congressional record
referred simply to a "third country". It is also well known
that Congressional prohibition on assassination and other basic human
rights violations by US forces are "bypassed" by the executive branch
relying on Israel to do so. But could such tasks have been
accomplished by other puppet countries even cheaper and without hurting
US interests in the Arab and Islamic world?
Other critics argued that the US showed it was very adept at finding
other puppets when they need them: after the fall of the Shah’s regime
in Iran, the US supported Baathist Iraq and Saddam
Hussain. And this was very profitable since most of the
money for Saddam did not come directly from eth US but from US other
puppet regimes in the oil rich Arab Gulf States. But then
Saddam wanted to support the Palestinians and wanted to build a strong
country (the rest as you know is history). They argued that
history shows that the return on investment simply would not bode well
for the disingenuous argument of people like Noam Chomsky that Israel
is simply a wholly owned subsidiary of US imperialism.
Yet other critics pointed out to the alienation of 1.3 billion Muslims
and hundreds of millions of Christians engendered by US support of
Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinian Christians and
Muslims. Clearly this can’t be in the interests of any
segment in American society. Two thirds of the nine million
Palestinians are now refugees and displaced
people. Defending this indefensible behavior is
difficult. Supporting it with billions of taxpayer money and
US diplomatic and military power is even more difficult. So
a concerted media campaign and strategy was needed to create the
illusion that
Israel is a strategic asset to US "interests".
The elephant in the room that is being hidden by this fig leaf is same
pervasive Zionist lobby in the US that has pushed the argument for the
fig leaf. According to Haaretz, Israel was really the only
country to whole-heartedly push for the war in Iraq. Since
the Israeli lobby is the most powerful foreign lobby in the US and is
rated as among the top 5 most powerful lobbies in DC overall, it would
be a legitimate question to ask what this lobby was doing in the months
and years leading up to the Iraq war and what (if any) influence does
it have. I think even a cursory review of the articles
written in newspapers or "studies" done by think tanks would be
sufficient to answer that question. Israeli apologists in these
influential think tanks and in major editorial and columnist positions
in mainstream media pushed for the war. But there were few
Israeli apologists who either stayed silent on the war or even opposed
it. This latter group became active in the anti-war movement
but wanted to make sure that there is no linkage between Iraq and
Palestine. They reacted vociferously and sometimes violently
when writers brought up the role of the Israeli lobby and its
extensions in pushing for the war on Iraq.
There are attempts to hide the evolution and increasing strength of
this lobby in the US (and before that in British imperial designs in
the Middle East). So let us review a few example of how this lobby
operated over the years and even challenged imperial interests on some
occasions.
1) In 1930 after career British diplomats issued a governmental backed
white paper suggesting tying Jewish immigration to Palestine to
Palestinian economic interests not just the Yishuv capacity, all hell
broke lose. Weissman and other British Zionist mobilized
their forces en masse and the effort succeeded in reversing this policy
quickly (well discussed in Tom Segev’s excellent book on this period).
2) When there was strong sentiment in the US to help
European Jews fleeing Nazi Germany, the Zionist lobby both in Britain
and the US lobbied to limit Jewish immigration to the west and keep the
door open only for one destination: Palestine (see Naeim Giladi’s book
"Ben Gurion Scandals" and Lenni Brenner’s "51 Documents: History of the
Nazi-Zionist collaboration).
3) When the State Department, the Pentagon, and all major career
diplomats in the US stood against support for establishment of Israel,
President Truman explained his decision to his cabinet (privately) very
clearly as relating to the lobby and voting adding that "I have no Arab
constituency" (Truman papers and many history books). The US
went on to twist the arms of other countries to support partition and
imposing of a Jewish state on Palestine.
4) When Israeli forces attacked the USS Liberty in International waters
in 1967, the white house aided by Congress pushed the Navy to hide the
facts. Senior Navy officers (and all survivors of the
attack) were angry but could do nothing in the face of a consorted
media silencing campaign. Even in 2003 when new evidence
emerged little is reported on it (see http://www.ussliberty.org/)
5) When George Bush 41 received a barrage of media questions in a Press
conference in 1991 (after Baker earned the ire of the lobby by
suggesting linking expending in growing settlements with foreign aid),
Bush uttered his famous line"I am only this little guy in the white
house …. there are these thousands on Capital Hill…" so much for the
grand leader of the Military/Industrial complex. Bush and
Baker backed down and building went on to increase the number
of colonists/settlers on occupied Palestinian areas from
<200,000 in 1991 to over 450,000 in 2000. This was the main reason
for collapse of the peace process and increased resentment and anger in
the world.
6) President Clinton brought to high office people who were previously
employed by the various Israeli lobby groups. Dennis Ross who worked
for WIMEP then appointed as US Envoy to the Middle East and then
returned to work for WINEP (see
http://www.activistsreader.com/articles%20folder/thinktankwatch-winep2.html).
Martin Indyk worked for AIPAC and to my knowledge is the only lobbyist
for a foreign country ever appointed ambassador to that same foreign
country. These folks and many others made clear their
interest in merging US policy and Israeli policy. Thus it
was not surprising that Clinton issued assurances saying that if the
Camp David meetings fail, no one will be faulted. But even
as negotiations continued in Taba, Ross, Clinton, and Indyk blamed
Arafat. The Clinton administration under influence of these
lobbyists continued to support aggressive policy in Iraq and tried
valiantly to thwart the International community (and US businesses) who
pushed for letting go of the sanctions that were killing 6000 children
every month.
7) When GWB 43 appointed people like Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney,
Douglas Feith, and Richard Perle to high offices, there was no
questioning the affiliation of those folks to the Zionist
lobby. Cheney was for example in the board of the so called
"Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs"
(JINSA). Perle and Wolfowitz were active in Zionist think
tanks like the American Enterprise Institute. Those are the
folks who pushed for war on Iraq and their paper records show their
rationing includes supporting Israel
(http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/706/op60.htm ).
There is a myth that weapons and oil industries support
Israel. The fact is that most of the time Israeli/Zionist
interests and those interests of weapons/oil companies are completely
divergent See http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/
In fact many argue that without the lobby, there would not be support
for Israeli colonization nor for an illegal and illegitimate war on
Iraq and certainly not from companies that are suffering because of
this close relationship. Israel in fact is now directly
competing with US Weapons manufacturers in exporting high tech weapons
(most of it made possible by US transfer of military technology and
money to Israel). Congress and the White House frequently
have had to interfere to protect Israel from any repercussions by its
violations of US and international laws regarding proliferation, arms
export, use of arms against civilians etc.
There were rare times when the lobby was not as powerful in pushing the
myth of equivalency of US and Israeli interests. In 1956
President Eisenhower listened to career diplomats and US elites, and
pressed for Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza and Sinai despite
rumblings from Congress (itself influenced by the lobby). But any such
minor resistance vanished after 1967 when the lobby pushed the idea
that US weapons in Israeli hands are keeping the Soviets/Communism out
of the Middle East (a lie because communism could never get a hold in
Arab society). Now do not misunderstand anything I
said. It is misleading to say that Israel rules US foreign
policy. But it would be even more misleading to ignore the
central role of this lobby in shaping US foreign policy in the Middle
East and in building support by various means. Nor would it
be fair to ignore the PR aimed at exaggerating the "strategic use"
argument to outright misinformation about threats and responses to
promoting a particular and false view of Christianity ("Christian
Zionism"). For those of us interested in freedom and
equality (i.e. human rights), it is simply not correct to try to ignore
history and facts and accept the language of our
oppressor. It is playing into both Zionist and Imperial
hands by accepting their claim that the reason for support of Israel
(and for the war on Iraq) is a "strategic relationship" directed to
serving only US elite interests (oil, military, and other corporate
interests).
The hypocrisy in US foreign policy is now visible to most people around
the world and even here in the US with a self-censoring media it is
hard to avoid it. Take this simple Israel has WMD, has
violated 65 UN Security Council Resolutions and was shielded from 35
others by a US Veto (because of the strong lobby), discriminates
against people based on religion and the US supports it.
Iraq violated very few UN SC resolutions by invading Kuwait and the US
bombed Iraq to a pre-industrial age (destroying water purification,
sewage, electrical, transportation and other critical facilities),
subjected it to sanctions (even after the withdrawal from Kuwait) that
killed over 1 million civilians, and then bombed and occupied Iraq
intending to build 14 permanent military basis in Iraq and installing a
new Israel-friendly regime!! Is it any wonder that people ask why we
have such hypocrisy and question the given answers formulated in Tel
Aviv. After all, Iraq will continue to be a magnet of
resistance fighters pouring in from other Arab and Islamic countries as
long as Israel is supported in its continued ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians (i.e. As long as this hypocrisy is evident).
Some democrats believe the attack on Iraq was for corporate
profits. Some republicans believe it was WMD, defeating
terrorism, and most lately bringing "democracy" and
freedom. Many US TV and newspapers consider a discussion
outside this permissible duality as taboo. But people are
getting facts about the Israeli lobby from international media, books,
and most importantly the Internet. This explains why an
increasing number of democrats, republicans, greens, and independents
in the US asking some serious questions that go beyond this duality
that misses so much. More people are realizing that without
explaining the role of the Israeli lobby in pushing for this war, the
story would be very incomplete at best and misleading at
worse.
Many within the lobby are also finally seeing the light and leaving
that destructive work. Thousands of Jews are now openly
speaking about the destructive power of the lobby. The
ground is shifting as Jews, Christians, Muslims, and others who believe
in human rights and do not support Zionism join hands not only to point
out the elephant in the room but also to take the old elephant out of
the room and to an overdue retirement.
Links for resources on this issue:
Can We Talk, Eric Alterman, The Nation Magazine
NeoConservatives and their Blueprints on US Policy, CSM
US Think Tanks Behind US Foreign Policy
Selective Intelligence by Seymour Hirsch
OK President Bush, What if…Fred M. Donner, Chicago Tribune
The Strong Must Rule the Weak: A Philosopher for an Empire, Jim Lobe
Its Not Just the Oil by Stan Heller
Invading Iraq: Converging US and Israeli Agendas, Ronald Bleier
The Axis of War and Mischiev in the Middle East
Their dog-eat-dog world by Mazin Qumsiyeh, Al-Ahram Newspaper
Neo-Cons, Israel and the Bush Administration By Stephen Green
Military Occupation with a difference by Mazin Qumsiyeh
War for Israel by Jeff Blankfort
Other
US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation Schedule of Events, Sept. 24-25
Saturday, Sept. 24
9:30 AM Palestine rally and feeder march begins at Farragut Square, 17th & I Streets NW
11:00 AM Palestine march arrives at Palestine Tent (near Washington Monument) to form a contingent for main rally
Events in Palestine Tent
3:00 PM-4:00
PM Teach-in
by Mazin Qumsiyeh: Palestinian Refugees' Right of Return
4:00 PM-5:00
PM Poetry
Slam featuring Son of Nun, Ora Wise and members of DC Guerilla Poets
5:00 PM-6:00
PM Teach-in
by Phyllis Bennis: Dual Occupations—Iraq and Palestine
6:00 PM-7:00
PM Palestinian
food provided by Mama Ayesha’s and Mediterranean Bakery
7:00 PM-7:30
PM Teach-in
by Noura Erakat: The Campaign Against Caterpillar
8:00 PM-9:00
PM Teach-in
by Mohammed Abed: Boycotts, Divestment, and Sanctions
Sunday, September 25
10:00 AM-6:00
PM
Palestine Film Festival
mazin@al-awda.org
|