November 27, 2005
"I
have learned from first hand experience that war is the destroyer of
all that is good in the world. It turns our young into soulless killers
and we tell them they are "heroes" when they master the art of killing."
--Conscientious Objector and Prisoner of Conscience, Sgt Kevin Benderman
It
has been said of Sgt. Kevin Benderman by those in command and control
at Ft. Stewart, GA., after Kevin publicly announced his refusal to
deploy to Iraq a second time, that his action was "endangering" those
from FT. Stewart who would be deploying to Iraq. Officers at FT.
Stewart, as well as some senior NCO’s (non-commissioned officers for
you non military types) along with the Hawks in the blogging community,
were incessant in their condemnation of Kevin; with all of them
articulating the same theme of how Kevin was endangering those who
would go to Iraq by his [Kevin’s] refusal to go. Kevin is now in a
military prison for the next 15 months. (For full details and timeline
on and about Kevin’s position as a Conscientious Objector, trial and
subsequent events, I strongly urge you to see: BendermanTimeline )
Captain
Schenk, S-2 at FT. Stewart, GA. (S-2 is Army military intelligence),
was busted for stealing. He was stealing the armored plates for the
body armor vests the troops from FT Stewart would be wearing in Iraq.
Capt Schenk was then selling those plates on E-Bay for between $3,000
and $4,000 a piece. Capt. Schenk was sent to jail for 45 days behind
his theft of and sale of the protective gear the troops from FT.
Stewart would need in Iraq.
Now I ask you, between the two men,
who in fact was it that endangered the troops: Kevin, by his refusals
to be a part of needless and senseless killing, like shooting kids just
for climbing on a wall? Or Capt. Schenk by stealing and selling, for
personal profit, those things needed to prevent injury to the troops?
For
me, this presents an unanswered question: Why does a man who refuses to
be a participant in what were illegal orders, in an illegal war, which
was based on provable lies and deceptions, spend 15 months in a
military jail; while a thief, a commissioned officer at the same base
at the same time, gets caught selling the troops protective equipment
and only gets 45 days in jail? Something is seriously wrong with this
picture to say the least! In fact, why is Kevin Benderman in a military
jail at all? What was Kevin’s "crime" other than having the courage to
act on his principles, his convictions, and then through proper
military channels, filed application as a Conscientious Objector?
A Partial Explanation:
When
Sgt Kevin Benderman requested a change in his status as a Conscientious
Objector, his command at Ft Stewart went absolutely ballistic, which is
putting it mildly. The command structure of Kevin’s unit, the 2-7 F Co,
3rd ID, knew that they had to make an example of Kevin so as to
discourage others at FT Stewart from following Kevin in his resistance
to this war as a CO. Re-enlistments were, and are going down
drastically; recruitment was down and decreasing further. In short, the
Army was, and is, having critical manpower shortages and the last thing
the Army needed, or needs, is a growing chorus of active duty war
resisters—CO’s. So the Army command at Ft Stewart set about trying to
"prove" that Kevin was making "disloyal" public statements. If they
could succeed with this tactic, they would be able to not only shut
Kevin up, but send a message to others that if you do not shut up and
just do what you are told, your next residence will be a jail cell.
Regardless
of what the "formal" charges which were leveled against Sgt. Kevin
Benderman—"Missing a Movement"; regardless of what Kevin was "formally"
convicted of; regardless of what Kevin was "formally" sentenced for by
the Army at his Court Martial at Ft Stewart, GA., on July 29, 2005, one
thing is certain: Sgt. Kevin Benderman, having been to Iraq once, who
was now speaking out in opposition to the war in Iraq, as far as the
Army was concerned, had committed a court-martial offense and they were
going to "get" him [Kevin] at all cost.
According to the Army’s
own manuals, it is a court-martial offense to issue public statements
that are critical and or denouncing one’s "commander-in-chief" more so
in a "time of war." With the military falling in step with the
Bush/Cheney team of "Mayberry Machiavelli’s" it could not allow anyone,
especially a voice as loud, clear and articulate as Kevin’s to
continue. Kevin had to be silenced, least others follow suit and also
start saying no—thereby bursting the bubble of the Washington consensus
of high troop support for this war of choice in Iraq, among other
issues about just what are we doing in Iraq. The Army’s Biggest Problem However:
The
biggest problem comes in over the simple fact the Army could not, as
much as it wanted, and tried, they could not court-martial Kevin for
disloyal statements; as Kevin, at least initially, was not speaking out
publicly against the war or the Bush Administration. Kevin wrote one letter to Bush in Nov of 2004
but that was months after he had filed his CO application. Somehow it
ended up on the 'Military Family Speaks Out’ web-site and it was that
letter the Army attempted using to prove Kevin was disloyal.
However,
when the Army lawyers at Ft Stewart forwarded those charges of
"Disloyal Statements" to JAG (Judge Advocate General), JAG wrote back
and essentially told them at FT Stewart they were out of their minds,
as there was absolutely no evidence what-so-ever that Kevin had ever
made a disloyal statement. Basically, dissent in the Army is considered
disloyalty. How absurd! So, the Army at FT Stewart started trolling
around to find other false and phony charges they could level at Kevin
in the effort to shut him up and make an example of him to keep others
in line.
From the outset, Kevin was not railing against the
Administration or even the premise for the Iraq invasion. Kevin did not
apply as a CO to protest the war, he applied as a CO as an individual
who had made the conscious decision that he, as an individual, could
not participate in that which war is, mass killing on a grand scale;
with the majority of those being killed innocent, women and children,
the aged, the infirm—as is true in all wars. Innocents are killed 10 to
1 when compared to "troops" on all sides.
It was not until,
during the months between Kevin filing as a CO and Nov 2004 when Kevin
wrote his letter to Bush, that Kevin began seeing all of the evidence
that was coming out, pretty much confirming the lies and deceptions
behind the invasion and occupation of Iraq. It was not until well into
2005, and based on increasing amounts of irrefutable evidence of the
grand deceptions of Bush/Cheney & Co., that Kevin began to
challenge the very premise of this invasion/occupation. I’ve
learned a lot of things about Kevin and Monica over the past 15 months
or so. We have spent so many, many hours upon hours on the phone. Kevin
Benderman is one of the single most deliberate, deliberative, seriously
critical thinking men I know. I’ve yet to witness Kevin making a snap
decision, or a decision based on emotional response. Nope, not Kevin,
when Kevin makes a decision, such as he did when he applied as a CO--or
as now, speaking out publicly in condemnation of what Bush/Cheney has
unleashed--it is only after much deliberative thought after
disseminating serious amounts of factual information.
Kevin has,
in my opinion, been able to do what most still have yet to achieve—a
good balance between brain and emotions. Emotionally charged decisions
always end up a disaster, as the emotions over-rule the brain and
critical thinking. When Kevin, or Monica for that matter, makes a
decision it is not an emotional response, it is a decision that is well
thought out over a period of time, and which is based on empirical
evidence and fact; not like the fantasy based decisions coming out of
Washington, D.C. today. "That which is emotionally rooted is
intellectually insoluble"--something to contemplate. Kevin and Monica
Benderman understand that concept fully. Back to where I was at before
getting side-tracked.
Having been to Iraq once; having been
witness to the tragedy, the senseless brutality, the horror that is
war, Kevin had no doubt that war was not and is not the answer to our
problems. It was hearing orders given to shoot children if they were to
climb back up on a wall, among many other things Kevin saw and heard,
which turned Kevin against this war—against war and killing.
Kevin,
like all who go into the military, have some idea of the "rules of war"
and basically what constitutes a war crime. After being in Iraq, Kevin
came to understand, like so many others that have seen the brutality
and insanity that is war, that war itself is the ultimate "war crime"
and it was this, as a Conscientious Objector that Kevin was speaking
out against.
"All Kevin did was speak to the fact
that war was not the answer - and that he had seen enough of war to
know that he was going to not participate in it any longer."
So as much as the Army wanted to try and use that to court-martial
Kevin for disloyal public statements, it/they couldn’t. So the Army’s
next step was to trump up an entirely different set of charges, which
is pretty much what then happened to Kevin. I know I’m repeating myself
here, but this is so important, it bears a bit of redundancy. The
way I see it, that is why Kevin Benderman is serving time in a military
jail at FT Lewis, WA. For the Army, Kevin was a threat, as he openly
articulated what so many were thinking and feeling but afraid to say
openly, in part due to the threat of court-martial hanging over their
heads for speaking out publicly. If Kevin was not silenced, openly and
publicly by the Army, others might also shed their fear and end their
silence. Then like Kevin, also speak out in opposition to this war in
the public forum.
But, and I must emphasize this, it was not
until well after Kevin had filed as a CO that he started making any
public statements against the war in Iraq or the Bush Administration.
Kevin did not start making such statements until after much information
and evidence came to public awareness about just how and why the
invasion of Iraq even took place. Kevin is way too cautious and
deliberate in his thinking and decision making to ever take the chance
of making a "snap" decision. So, contrary to what the Army has stated
many times, Kevin’s speaking out against the Iraq invasion itself is
relatively recent. And it came only after much "evidence" as well as
much very deliberate contemplation and serious prayer.
Kevin is
speaking out against the invasion and occupation of Iraq now due to the
simple fact there is now irrefutable evidence that it was and is wrong.
That it is being conducted for every reason other than any of the
stated reasons, and has no purpose other than continuing to get a lot
of people killed needlessly with absolutely no end in sight.
There is no doubt in my mind the "official consensus" of high troop morale is on its face a lie.
I’ve spoken with way too many military and veterans organizations, and
have received mega-hundreds of emails from active duty military in the
past couple of years, with the numbers increasing this year—all saying
the same thing, our people in uniform are in serious trouble as morale is going thru the floor!
No one knows what the "mission" is past just kill, kill, and kill some
more—in between the dying that is; and all while like us that were in
Vietnam, just fighting to stay alive and get back home. How can we
allow anyone to go to jail for refusing to participate in this
insanity? To me, that defies all logic and reason. Kevin, the Military and Conscientious Objector Declarations: "In
a small, quiet courtroom, on the Ft. Stewart military installation, the
stage is set. One soldier who, after firsthand experience with the
destructive force of war, decided to take the Ten Commandments at their
word – "Thou Shall Not Kill" – and use the rights given to him to
declare his conscious objection to war, to no longer be in a position
to voluntarily have to kill another human being, is now on trial for
not wanting to kill.
The Army has removed itself so completely
from its moral responsibility, that its representatives are willing to
openly demand, in a court of law, that they be allowed to regain
"positive control over this soldier" by finding him guilty of crimes he
did not commit, and put him in jail – a prisoner of conscience, for
daring to obey a moral law.
It is "hard work" to face the truth,
and it is scary when people who are not afraid to face it begin to
speak out. Someone once said that my husband’s case is a question of
morality over legality. I pray that this country has not gone so far
over the edge that the two are so distinctly different that we can tell
them apart." (Monica Benderman) The following
letter of Feb. 2004 was written to Sen. Chuck Warner by the father of a
young man who was in the Marine Corps. While in boot-camp this young
man determined that he would not be able to do that for which the
Marine Corps was training him—to kill. After much discussion with his
family, with chaplains, with his own conscientious, he filed the proper
forms and paperwork as a Conscientious Objector—that was in 2004.
What
this young man then went thru for the next 11 months prompted his
father, an active duty U.S. Navy Captain to write the following; and
which I consider to be the single most articulate and well though out
statement on the subject of conscientious objectors, as well as how the
military does, or rather does not deal with legitimate CO applications
and the people who file them.
This has direct application and
relevance to what Kevin Benderman has, and is going thru behind his
filing the application as a Conscientious Objector and going public
with that; as it does with all who make such application in the current
"environment."
Substitute Kevin’s name in this, Ft Stewart and
the Army for the Marine Corps and this letter has direct application
and bearing on everyone who stands as a CO in today’s
military—especially Kevin Benderman, one of the single most ethical,
principled and honorable men it has ever been my privilege to know.
(The full letter of Feb. 2005 may be read Here.)
Now on to those parts of the letter with direct application to Kevin;
which explains how rules, laws, and regulations that are in place for
people in the military, are used in very insidious ways to suppress and
repress active duty personnel; especially if they have the "temerity"
to file as a Conscientious Objector. "…
Additionally, I wanted you to know that Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) is
investigating the possibility of preparing and introducing a Bill - to
be known as the Military Conscientious Objector Act - that would seek
to protect the rights of military members who desire status as a
Conscientious Objector.
… there is great opportunity for the
military to waste time and money because of our generally negative
predisposition when considering these matters. While it doesn't make
sense from a personnel management aspect for the Services to make the
process to attain Conscientious Objector status easy, the Services
could do a much better job of making the process fair - and to NOT
treat applicants as though they have committed a crime while working
through the process… … it appears to me
that he is judging… qualification for CO discharge on the basis of his
own stereotypes rather than any legal definition of conscientious
objection. In short… is judging… beliefs and sincerity on the basis of
his own ideas rather than any requirements of the regulations…
…The
law does not require a conscientious objector to be opposed to all
forms of…It requires only that a person be conscientiously opposed to
the planned and organized killing that takes place in warfare…
…I
am sure that by comparing…the experiences of other CO's past and
present, you will quickly see that the process is indeed broken. Not
only is the process inconsistently applied, it's subject to the
stereotypes/prejudices of the assigned Investigating Officer. While
that's a variable that might be impossible to contain, we - the
services – could still do a better job of codifying the Conscientious
Objector discharge process…
…Military Officers are not trained
to make these kinds of assessments. More importantly, line officers are
compromised from the start and should not be placed in this position
because a positive endorsement on their part is currently culturally
unacceptable in the officer corps generally and could impugn the
credibility and professionalism of the Investigating Officer
specifically…Officers will deny this bias and publicly, firmly deny
that they are to act as expected. Yet we cannot deny that competition
for promotion is keen and an officer's decision to be supportive of a
Conscientious Objector while on the cusp of further promotion is an
extraordinarily difficult prospect just prior to his 20th year of
service when vested in retirement. These are especially difficult
decisions when many must ensure they will be retained at mid-career and
have a retirement for the benefit of their family - generally, no
blemish on an officer's service record is sustainable…" This
makes one wonder why the U.S. Military even bothers to have rules,
regulations or guidelines on the what, who, and how of filing as a
Conscientious Objector. Especially when looking at how various Officers
see anyone within their commands requesting CO status as a threat to
their next promotion, as what happened with Sgt Kevin Benderman. "…The value and right to a free conscious, after all, is what this is all about…" A Brief Look Back:
When
Kevin’s unit was sent to Iraq the first time, Kevin, like so many of us
from previous U.S. wars, saw the utter destruction caused by our
invasion of Iraq. He saw the slip by people around him into complete
disregard for human life in their struggle to just stay alive; he saw
the slaughter of innocent people; he saw the total disregard and
elevation of man’s inhumanity to man; he heard orders to "shoot to
kill" even children. He saw, heard, and began to understand that what
American’s were being told about what was happening in Iraq were lies;
whose only purpose were to keep public approval for this U.S. war of
aggression up—deliberate deception. Kevin began to realize, as have so
many others, that war is not the answer. And a war based on deliberate
deceptions and lies, as is this war of choice that has been unleashed
in Iraq, is definitely not an answer to anything. "He
returned knowing that war is wrong; that it is the most dehumanizing
creation of humanity that exists. He saw war destroy civilians,
innocent men, women and children. He saw war destroy homes,
relationships and a country. He saw this not only in the country that
was invaded, but he saw this happening to the invading country as well,
here in the U.S. – and he knew that the only way to save those soldiers
was for people to no longer participate in war. Sgt. Kevin Benderman is
a Conscientious Objector to war; and the Army is mad.
Sgt. Kevin
Benderman, after serving one tour of duty in Iraq, filed for
Conscientious Objector status, his Constitutional right. His commander
refused to accept his application and one called him a coward. One
chaplain was ashamed of his lack of moral fortitude, another, of higher
rank, testified to the true sincerity of Sgt. Benderman’s beliefs, in
writing. A military intelligence officer decided that he knew matters
of the soul better than a man of God, and recommended to deny the CO
claim. Five commissioned officers who had never met Sgt. Benderman
agreed with the "intelligent officer" and the claim was denied, twice."
(Monica) Here in the U.S. there is a
"deeply-held belief that no matter what this nations governing body
does abroad, no matter how bad what it does may appear, no matter what
horror may result, the American government means well;" That the
'government’ has good intentions and means well; And, generally
speaking, the American public wonders why the rest of the world can’t
see how "kind" and "generous" and "self-sacrificing" America is and has
been. Unfortunately, the road to hell is paved with "good intentions."
Who can forget George W. Bush in 2003, when Iraqi’s started standing up
to the invasion and occupation of their country and started fighting
back saying, "What is the matter with those people, don’t they know how
good we are?" Pretty much says it all does it not?
According
to Monica Benderman (who is simple one of the 5 most incredible, solid,
intelligent, tireless and committed women it has been my pleasure to
have met in the past few years) two things took place at the end of
Kevin’s "court-martial": "The entire prosecution team,
including witnesses, all stood outside the doorway and laughed while
Kevin was walking to the van. They wanted to put him in shackles and
chains "so that the media could take pictures of him that way" but his
supervisor, the man they had placed in charge of that, refused to do
that, so Kevin walked freely. This supervisor has been very supportive
of Kevin from the start - and continues to be very upset about what is
happening, as he knows the truth."
Also according
to Monica, among others, photos of Kevin being led out and away after
what flimsily passed for a "trial" were plastered all over the walls of
the company offices for the Forward Operating Base outside of Baghdad
where the 2-7th Foxtrot Company is currently deployed with the caption—
"This is what happens if you do not obey and follow orders."
If that is not a threat to those in uniform--telling them, yes it is
within anyone’s rights to file as a Conscientious Objector, but if you
do this is what will happen--I don’t know what you can call it! Right
now - my husband and I are fighting against this country - for the
right to be together - to be US - to have what we have worked on - our
relationship - and our private life. It is all we ask - and we will
give what we can - we have given what we can - all we want is us - and
for the soldiers and their families who have been so severely
disrespected to be able to have themselves back again too. (Monica
Benderman) A Few Concluding Thoughts: Since
this nation lost its mind behind Bush & Co and their subsequent
"wars of aggression," those who now make application as a C.O.
according to the "rules," have almost all been criminalized by the
military; and in most cases have been imprisoned—as has Kevin
Benderman. Who, in my book, is a man of tremendous ethics, integrity,
honor, character; and that's why I agree with, as Norman Solomon has stated, "Kevin
Benderman, now in prison, is providing greater moral leadership than
any member of the United States Senate." I would just take it a step
further: Kevin Benderman is providing greater moral leadership than any
member of the Senate, the House of Representatives, the White House,
and the nation as a whole. We would all do well to follow his example,
and that especially includes those who are currently on active duty in
the military.
Quite frankly, I do not see this
Cheney/Bush "War of Aggression" coming to an end as long as they are in
office. Like Vietnam, this illegal war in Iraq will come to an end when
the troops start putting down the guns and, also like in Vietnam, start
openly rebelling against illegal orders given in an illegal invasion
and subsequent occupation. Especially when considering the group of
thugs, extortionists and criminals that are in charge of the White
House and both houses of Congress.
This Kevin Benderman has done
already—he put down his gun. As have many others and who have now been
joined by the first women in uniform, Katherine Jashinsky, to openly oppose this war and who has recently filed as a Conscientious Objector.
This
much I know: we cannot continue to allow good people like Kevin
Benderman to be sent to prison for refusing to be a participant in
illegal wars, as we know this one to be. Especially when you consider
that many of those making the "rules" that send people of conscience
like Kevin to prison are under indictments—criminals sending honest men
to prison. Really makes a lot of sense does it not??
This is an email Monica sent to me about life in the RCF at Ft Lewis, per a conversation with Kevin: "The
tables at the RCF mess hall were decorated with cornucopias full of
fruit and nuts -- there were candy dishes full of treats in front of
every inmate -- and there were three enormous ice sculptures on the
serving tables. Kevin talked to one of the cooks who told him that the
ice sculptures alone cost almost $1000.00. The inmates were not allowed
to eat any of the candy, nuts or fruit.
They have to wait longer
to make phone calls home today - the phones near the command center at
the front of the facility are off limits to them today because that is
the entrance being used by family visitors who are coming to eat with
the inmates - and for special military guests. The inmates are not
allowed to interact with anyone who has not been approved to come visit
them - so they have been kept in hiding with access to the phones only
at the back of the facility.
Kevin approached the Colonel who is
commanding one of the brigades, I believe the 704th MP Brigade. He told
the Col. that they had no business spending almost $1000.00 on the ice
sculptures when the showers were not working, the toilets and sinks
were backing up and the windows were broken and letting cold air in
throughout the living quarters of the facility. The Col's response was
that there were two budgets, one for decorations for the mess hall, and
one for maintenance, and the toilets were part of the maintenance
budget. Kevin said he told him that they needed to cancel the decor
budget and fix the toilets.
Kevin also told several that he was
thankful for being at the RCF, and that he was sure he wanted to stay
now that he had such a beautifully decorated mess hall to eat in. He
said he told every commander he could find that he was grateful for his
command at Ft. Stewart having lied and manipulated evidence just to put
him at Ft. Lewis so he could see everything that he had - he thought
he'd seen it all until he got there, and now they had just given him
more to speak out about.
Several told Kevin that it was Thanksgiving and that he should give it a rest for one day -- Fools –" This
concludes Part 1 of what is an ongoing story about Kevin, and about the
situation at the RCF, Ft Lewis, WA.—the military’s mini U.S. Abu Ghraib
for its own. See: Torture and Prostitution at Ft Lewis—The Investigation Begins.
For
those of you that are letter writers, as am I, here are the addresses
of those in command at the RCF, at Ft Lewis. They really do need to
hear form as many as are willing to write, which hopefully will be all
of you.
Fort Lewis Garrison Commander 525 Replacement Ft. Lewis, Washington 98433-9500
Commander Fort Lewis Regional Facility Box 339536 Ft. Lewis, Washington 98433-9536
Kevin Mitchell Benderman Box 339536 Fort Lewis, Washington 98433-9536 …………………………………………………………
Also See:
Freedom to make a choice.By: Monica Benderman http://jack-dalton.blogspot.com/2005/08/sgt-kevin-benderman-and-freedom-to.html
The Case of Sergeant Benderman By: Camilo Mejia Truthout http://jack-dalton.blogspot.com/2005/07/case-of-sgt-kevin-benderman.html
Jack
Dalton is a disabled Vietnam veteran, activist and writer who lives in
Portland, OR. He is widely published on multiple web publications. He
was also a contributing writer in the recently released book: "Neo-Conned! Again", by: IHS Press. He may be contacted thru his blog, "Jack’s Straight-Speak": http://jack-dalton.blogspot.com/ or, jack_dalton@comcast.net Fair Use Statement In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Law, this
attributed work is provided via Thomas Paine’s Corner on a non-profit
basis to facilitate understanding, research, education, and the
advancement of human rights and social justice.
|