November 28, 2005
sponsorship of terrorism by western governments, targeting their own
populations, has been a taboo subject. Although major scandals have received
cursory coverage in the media, the subject has been allowed to immediately
disappear without discussion or investigation. Therefore the appearance this
year of two major studies of this subject is a welcome breakthrough, and
provides essential reading for anyone struggling to understand the events of
September 11, 2001 and the post September 11 world.
studies are complementary. NATO's Secret Armies, Operation Gladio and
Terrorism in Western Europe by Daniele Ganser concerns terrorism sponsored
by American and British intelligence in Western Europe and Turkey between the
end of World War II and 1985. The War on Truth, 9/11, Disinformation, and
the Anatomy of Terrorism by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed chronicles the
cultivation and sponsorship of militant Islamic terrorism by the intelligence
services of the United States, Britain and Russia from 1979 to the present. Both
studies are models of scholarship -- meticulously documented and carefully
reasoned -- but the world they reveal will boggle the mind of the most
wild-eyed conspiracy theorist.
Creating "Communist" Terrorism to Fuel the Cold War
Secret Armies describes how following World
War II the US and Britain, fearing a Soviet invasion of Europe, established "stay-behind"
paramilitary units throughout Western Europe and in Turkey. Had the anticipated
Soviet invasion occurred these units would have constituted ready made
resistance groups, trained and armed, with secure communications with each
other and with their allies in Britain and the US. In some counties, for
example Norway and Sweden, these stay-behind units were true to their original
charters, remaining inactive until they disbanded at the end of the Cold War. In
other countries, however, the paramilitary units were activated by their
handlers in the United States as part of a hellish "Strategy of Tension"
designed to convince left-leaning populations in Italy, Germany, Belgium,
Greece, Turkey and other countries that their very lives were at risk from
communist terrorists. The arms and bombs originally intended for the Soviets
were turned instead on their own compatriots with the aim of placing the blame
for the waves of terrorist attacks on communists.
Italy the stay-behind operation was referred to as Gladio (Latin for "Sword").
The Piazza Fontana bombings that killed 16 and wounded 80 shortly before
Christmas in 1969 initiated a wave of terrorist bombings in Italy by Gladio
operatives that continued throughout the 1970s. The worst single bombing
occurred in the Bologna train station in 1980, killing 85 and wounding 200. Another
Gladio bombing in Brescia in 1974 killed eight and wounded 102, and the same
year a train was bombed in Rome, killing 12 and wounding 48. The case that led
to the discovery of the Gladio plots by the Italian courts was a 1972 bombing
that killed three policemen.
Gladio operations in Italy are relatively well known and well understood
because of several high level judicial investigations that received coverage in
the European press and have been the subject of a few books. One contribution
of Ganser's book is to bring this material together in a concise and well
organised format. Further, Ganser extends his study beyond Italy to examine the
effects of stay-behind operations throughout Western Europe and in Turkey.
was quite surprised to learn that by far the most extensive and destructive
stay-behind operations were those carried out in Turkey under the code name
Counter-Guerrilla. Among other crimes, a long series of bombings, random
killings and assassinations, covertly perpetrated by CIA-controlled
Counter-Guerrilla operatives in the late 1970s, were used as a pretext for the
military coup in 1980 that led to the installation of a pro-American and
pro-Israeli government there. I was also shocked to learn that stay-behind
operatives were responsible for a series of horrific terrorist attacks in
Belgium as late in the Cold War as 1985, although this is still the subject of
unconvincing official denials.
limitation of Ganser's study, which he frequently laments, is the unavailability
of official documentation because all materials relating to the stay-behind
operations remain highly classified. All Freedom of Information Act requests to
date have been denied by American authorities. One might have hoped that at
least with the end of the Cold War such atrocious strategies would be
renounced, and that the implicated governments would make every effort to come
clean and ensure that this history would not be repeated. Unfortunately, as The
War on Truth by Nafeez Ahmed makes clear, the Strategy of Tension has
proved to be so useful a tool both in terms of global and domestic politics
that, far from being abandoned, these despicable operations have become
increasingly accepted and commonplace.
Creating "Islamic" Terrorism for the Post-Cold
study centres on the attacks of September 11, 2001, but the story begins in
Afghanistan prior to the Soviet invasion in 1979. Zbigniew Brzezinski, national
security advisor to President Jimmy Carter at the time, has described in an
interview how, even prior to the invasion, the US had taken steps to fund the
Mujahedeen warlords and to inflame militant Islam in the region. The aim was to
destabilise the region and to force the Soviets to invade -- to draw them into
their own Vietnam-style quagmire.
to Brzezinski, "We did not push the Russians into invading, but we
knowingly increased the probability that they would. That secret operation was
an excellent idea. The effect was to draw the Russians into the Afghan trap."
the Soviets' inglorious retreat from Afghanistan, and even more so after the
collapse of the Soviet Union several years later, the policy of inflaming and
exploiting militant Islam was credited by many in the US national security
establishment for these historic developments. Ahmed has compiled irrefutable
evidence that the United States did not abandon the militant Islamists after
the end of the Cold War. In fact, American leadership at the very highest
levels has continued to covertly protect, assist and guide militant Islam in
general and al-Qaeda in particular in geopolitically important areas around the
world, including Central Asia, North Africa, the Balkans, and the Philippines.
is impossible to do justice to Ahmed's densely packed 390-page presentation
here, but I will give some representative examples.
Sergeant Ali Mohamed Joins al-Qaeda
Mohamed, an Egyptian intelligence officer, was fired in 1984 because of his
religious extremism. In spite of this and in spite of the fact that his name
was on the State Department's terrorist watch list, he was granted a visa to
enter the US and became a US citizen. By 1986 he was a sergeant in the US Army
and an instructor at the elite Special Warfare School at Fort Bragg. While in
this position Mohamed travelled to Afghanistan to meet with bin Laden, and he
assisted with the training of al-Qaeda operatives both in Afghanistan and in
the US. His immediate supervisors at Fort Bragg were duly alarmed by these
illegal activities, and reported them up the chain of command. When their
reports failed to produce any action, not even an official debriefing of
Mohamed upon his return from Afghanistan, at least one of his supervisors, Lt.
Col. Robert Anderson, concluded that Mohamed had been acting as part of an
operation sanctioned by an American intelligence agency, "probably the CIA."
activities in support of al-Qaeda throughout the 1990s were of the highest
significance to that organisation. In 1991, he handled security for bin Laden's
move from Saudi Arabia to the Sudan. In 1993, Mohamed accompanied bin Laden's
second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, on a fund raising tour of the United
States, again handling security arrangements. The funds raised helped support
Zawahiri in a Pentagon supported mission in the Balkans, which will be
discussed in the next section.
al-Qaeda members trained by Mohamed in the United States included several who
were later convicted in connection with the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Top
secret US Army training manuals supplied by Mohamed to the defendants were
produced as evidence at their trial.
himself did the initial surveillance for the al-Qaeda bombings of the US
embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. At the time Mohamed was on active reserve with
the Special Forces and was a paid FBI informant. Mohamed was at long last
charged with crimes in connection with the 1998 embassy bombings. In October
2000, he was convicted of five counts of conspiracy to murder nationals of the
United States. However, the nature of Mohamed's plea agreement, the sentence
handed down, if any, and Mohamed's present whereabouts remain secret.
The Pentagon Brings al-Qaeda to the Balkans
US national security establishment did not miss a beat in seeking to replicate
the triumph in Afghanistan in other geopolitically critical areas. The Soviet
puppet regime fell in Afghanistan in February 1992. That same year, the
Pentagon started importing Afghan jihadists organised by bin Laden into Bosnia
to wreak chaos and fuel the civil wars between Muslims and Serbs that
devastated the former Yugoslavia in the following years. Bin Laden's second in
command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, served as commander of the Mujahedeen forces in the
role of the Pentagon in airlifting the Mujahedeen terrorists into Bosnia and
Kosovo between 1992 to 1995 has been well documented and widely reported in the
European and Canadian media, but almost completely ignored in the United States.
However, the geopolitical advantages of breaking the former sovereign nation of
Yugoslavia into a patchwork of NATO protectorates, under the firm control of
the United States, did not go unnoted. New
Republic editors Jacob Heilbrunn and Michael Lind celebrated the event in a
New York Times article titled "The Third American Empire" published
on January 2, 1996:
"Instead of seeing Bosnia as the eastern frontier of
NATO, we should view the Balkans as the western frontier of America's rapidly
expanding sphere of influence in the Middle East . . . The regions once ruled
by the Ottoman Turks show signs of becoming the heart of a third American
empire . . . The main purpose of NATO countries, for the foreseeable future,
will be to serve as staging areas for American wars in the Balkans, the
Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf."
The CIA Brings al-Qaeda to the Philippines
1991, with the Afghan War winding down, the Abu Sayyaf terrorist group was
formed in the Philippines around a core of radical Afghan veterans. They
conducted their first kidnapping operation in 1992, and were responsible for a
series of bombings and kidnappings throughout the 1990s that were highly
destabilising for the Philippine government. Several high level al-Qaeda
operatives, including Ramzi Yousef and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed were involved. Funding
was provided by one of bin Laden's brothers in law, Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, an
important figure in the funding of al-Qaeda operations worldwide.
cites many authoritative sources, including Philippine intelligence officer
Rene Jarque, Lt. Col. Ricardo Morales, and Senator Aquilino Q. Pimentel, to
show that the Abu-Sayyaf group has received special assistance and protection
both from the Philippine military and from the United States. Pimentel in a
speech before the Philippine Senate in July of 2000 accused the CIA of creating
the terrorist organisation with the help of their contacts in the Philippine
military and intelligence communities.
incidents in particular have exposed the connivance of the United States in the
Abu Sayyaf reign of terror beyond a reasonable doubt. In December of 1994,
Khalifa was arrested during a visit to San Francisco on immigration violations.
The FBI was aware of his ties to the Abu Sayyaf group and to al-Qaeda, and
began a criminal investigation. Khalifa's lawyers tried to stall the
investigation and manoeuvre for extradition to Jordan. Incredibly, help came to
Khalifa from on high. Secretary of State Warren Christopher personally wrote a
three-page letter to Attorney General Janet Reno asking that the request for
extradition be granted. Accordingly, the FBI investigation was cancelled and
Khalifa was sent to Jordan per his own request, where he was soon a free man.
second incident is even more extraordinary and revealing. Michael Meiring, an
American citizen, arrived in the Philippines in 1992 and promptly formed close
working relationships both with high government officials and with rebel
leaders in the Abu Sayyaf group. In 2002, in the midst of a wave of Abu Sayyaf
bombings, Meiring accidentally detonated a bomb in his own hotel room in Mindao
causing grave injury to himself, requiring emergency hospitalisation. US
authorities immediately intervened. FBI agents and "agents of the National
Security Council" swept him away from his hospital room, first to a
hospital in Manila where Meiring was kept incommunicado and was treated by a
doctor hand-picked by the US embassy. Then Meiring was rushed back to the
United States. Like Ali Mohamed, his fate and current whereabouts are unknown. Numerous
attempts to have him extradited back to the Philippines for prosecution have
been stonewalled by US authorities.
motivations for American support of terrorism in the Philippines are not hard
to guess. In 1991, the same year that Abu Sayyaf was formed, the Philippines
Senate had voted to close all US military bases in their country, an action
with profound implications for the military posture of the United States in
South Asia. In 2002, due to the destabilising effects of the Abu Sayyaf
operations, the US military were invited back into the country to participate
in operation Balikatan ("shoulder to shoulder"), a joint
US/Philippine military exercise purportedly aimed at eliminating terrorism. These
operations required special exemptions from the Philippine Constitution, which
forbids foreign armies from operating on Philippine soil. Once again, al-Qaeda,
with the help of their American friends, had acted to advance the geostrategic
interests of the United States.
The Grand Design
above examples are by no means isolated anomalies. The bulk of Ahmed's fine
book is devoted to recording a pattern of evidence that is finally
overwhelming. As he says in conclusion, "not only does the strategy
employed in the new 'War on Terror' seem to provoke terrorism, but an integral
dimension of the strategy is the protection of key actors culpable in the
financial, logistical, and military-intelligence support of international
And Then There Is September 11 Itself . . .
what about the September 11 attacks themselves? Were they "blowback,"
i.e., unintended domestic consequences of foreign covert operations, or were
they an integral part of the Strategy of Tension? Based in part on an analysis
of intelligence warnings of the attacks, and on the absence of any air defence
response, Ahmed strongly endorses the latter view. He reviews the dozens of
very specific foreign and domestic intelligence warnings of terrorist attacks
in the United States using airliners that came in the months leading up to the
attacks. These in turn led to warnings issued by American intelligence to
Pentagon officials, and to others, including author Salman Rushdie and San
Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, to cancel all flight plans on the day of
September 11, 2001. Meanwhile, no action whatsoever was taken to warn or to
protect the American public.
points out that the responsible authorities at the Pentagon and the Federal
Aviation Administration have produced several profoundly contradictory accounts
of their own actions on that day -- each subsequent story seemingly an attempt
to remedy the shortcomings of a previous one. And still no remotely
satisfactory account of the failure to intercept even one of the four hijacked
airliners has been produced. Under ordinary circumstances, interception of
wayward aircraft by military fighters would have been absolutely routine; such
interceptions occurred at least 56 times in the calendar year prior to
September 11, 2001. Ahmed points out that the attacks were allowed to proceed "entirely
unhindered for over one and one half hours in the most restricted airspace in
the world." He finds the idea that this was due to negligence beyond
belief. Instead he argues that there must have been a deliberate stand-down of
the air defence system managed by senior national security officials including
the vice president and the secretary of defense.
The Future of the Strategy of Tension
books reviewed herein document a continuous history over the last 40 years of
the United States and other governments fostering and manipulating terrorism
for their own ends. Terrorist organisations have been used to destabilise
inconvenient regimes around the world, and to sow chaos, which can then serve
as a pretext for military intervention.
more importantly, terrorism is used to create a crisis atmosphere at home under
cover of which the crimes and corruption of government officials go unpunished,
civil liberties are easily abandoned, and major wars can be launched under
false pretences. Although at present there appears to be no reason for the
terror-masters in Washington to consider changing their tactics, the
publication this year of these two illuminating books raises the hope that the
Strategy of Tension, which can only thrive in darkness and confusion, will
ultimately have to be abandoned.
# # # # #
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, The War on Truth, 9/11,
Disinformation, and the Anatomy of Terrorism, Olive Branch Press, An
imprint of Interlink Publishing, 2005, Northampton, MA
Ganser, NATO's Secret Armies, Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe,
Frank Cass, 2005, London and New York
Copyright ę 1998-2005 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor
Top of Page