April 16, 2006
As each day passes, more and more Americans are becoming aware of the startling evidence that clearly contradicts the official explanation of Sept.11th, 2001 offered by the Bush administration. In fact, as more and more evidence comes to light, incongruities in the official explanation become increasingly and undeniably apparent.
Ironically, the growing number of people new to these unexplained
discrepancies poses a new problem for those of us who have been
researching 9/11 for many months or years. We will have to find a way
to explain the many complexities related to the attacks to those who
now doubt the official version of events. We are faced with the
overwhelming task helping great numbers of people understand the many contradictions in the 9/11 story they were fed by their government.
Obviously, that is not an easy assignment, even when the great
majority of truth seekers agree that the official explanation is little
more than a pre-written cover story designed to herd the American
public into supporting an agenda that would otherwise horrify and outrage them.
However, it becomes far more complicated in light of a topic that
causes a great deal of confusion within the research community itself.
That disparity relates to the strike on the Pentagon.
Many questions still remain about what actually took place at the Pentagon on September 11th 2001. That’s fine, because the goal of the 9/11 truth community is to raise these questions for further investigation. The problem arises when researchers feel that it is their responsibility to explain what happened
at the Pentagon. It is NOT. Rather, it is their charge to highlight the
doubts that have been legitimately raised regarding what exactly hit
Some researchers claim that a 110,000 ton Boeing 757 hit the building, leaving only a 16 foot hole in the facade (prior to its collapse some 22 minutes after the initial impact.) Others claim that an A-3 Skywarrior fighter jet was the actual aircraft. Some say it was an unmanned Global Hawk armed with depleted uranium missiles, and still others claim that the Pentagon was hit by another type of military missile. We can argue each of these theories forever, and accomplish absolutely nothing.
We really have to put and end the internal dispute
that is getting us nowhere and work together to bring information
rather than more uncertainty to the public that is now just entering
the 9/11 discussion. To that end, I am posing ONE pertinent question about the strike on the Pentagon: Why didn’t they show us the wreckage?
Planes do not simply vaporize. Never in the history of aviation disasters has an aircraft ever totally disintegrated. Even exploding space shuttles did not vanish into thin air.
Therefore, it stands to reason that whatever hit the Pentagon had to
leave some recoverable debris in its wake. Surely, there had be enough
identifiable rubble remaining from a 110,000 ton aircraft to satisfy the skeptics? There is no way to convince me that the few scraps of metal and small engine parts,
which according to some researchers are not from a 757, are proof of
anything. at all. Neither am I convinced that the handful of
uninformative photos that were released were not staged by the people
who planned this event. An 110,000 tons aircraft has to leave more convincing evidence than what we have been offered.
I defy anyone, anywhere to recreate a plane crash in which110,000 tons
of aircraft are reduced to a select few, barely identifiable parts.
Why was this most important event in America’s history not fully
documented by camera crews? Why wasn’t this event filmed and analyzed
to its fullest extent for historical and forensic purposes? Why weren’t
standard crime scene procedures followed, and why were government
officials permitted to tamper with and eventually collect and secrete
all of the crime scene evidence? Last time I looked, tampering with or destroying crime scene evidence was a felony. Why wasn’t every inch of the scene photographed by official investigators prior to the recovery process?
There is ample evidence of government complicity in the events of September 11th 2001, but nothing is more suspect than their relentless effort to prevent the public from examining the evidence.
The cover up may actually speak louder than the actual evidence of
complicity. That in itself may be the most important thing to consider
in all of this intrigue and mystery.
It is too late now for the Bush administration to make good and show
us the evidence. They have had 5 years to create a library of
fabricated films and images. By this time, they actually could have
produced a hanger full of faux plane wreckage. We needed to see the
evidence at the crime scene at the time of the crime. We did not, and
the troubling question remains unanswered: why didn’t they show us the
Even without the mounting evidence of their involvement, nothing
aside from time travel into the past will remove the aura of government
complicity in the events of 9/11. Nothing at all can remove
the cloud of suspicion that hangs over this administration because of
its undaunted and obvious efforts to keep essential evidence at the
Pentagon site hidden from the public.
One side note regarding the actions of a novice pilot attempting to hit the Pentagon: If you were throwing a dart at a toilet seat, would you aim at the side of the seat or would you aim down at the top of the seat, you know…the part that many men try to avoid hitting? Any pilot - especially a less skilled one - looking at the Pentagon as the target
of a projectile, surely would have planned a simple, top-down,
dive-bomb approach. The Pentagon is shaped like a set of of toilet
seats, one smaller than the other, each one residing in the void of the
next larger. The side of the Pentagon is 77′ high yet the topside
surface target space is approximately 29 acres. What would anyone
reasonably aim for - a 29 acre target or the relatively miniscule one -
on the ONLY reinforced section of the building designed to withstand a frontal attack?
I offer this as another common sense question left out of the
discussion by the people who continue to stand by one of the most
unbelievable fairy tales ever sold to the American public since the JFK
magic bullet story. It is another QUESTION, not an answer, in the long line of questions no one in any official capacity has been willing to listen to, never mind answer.
In conclusion, I repeat that we have to stop trying to
ANSWER the questions that have been raised. Instead, we have to
collectively demand the answers. Even more constructively, we
must focus on the essential questions that absolutely needs to be
answered. In the case of the Pentagon, where is there any concrete
evidence of the remains of a 110,000 ton Boeing 757 among the wreckage
at the scene? Why didn’t they collect, examine and reveal the wreckage to the public? Why, why, why didn’t those in charge of finding out what happened at the Pentagon show us the wreckage? We think we know.
Think about it. Jesse - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org