April 23, 2006
[Note to Tomdispatch readers: I'll be traveling
much of the week -- with no access to email until perhaps Tuesday,
limited access until Thursday, and minimal ability to respond to
letters and requests.]
Just a week back, I suggested that there was no reason to believe the
President's approval ratings had bottomed out. In fact, I wrote, "There
is no reason to believe that a polling bottom exists for this
President, not even perhaps the Nixonian Age of Watergate nadir in the
lower 20% range." Now, the latest Fox News poll
puts the President at an all-time low -- a 33% approval rating.
Democrats are long gone; independents peeling away in droves; and, it
seems, even Republicans not so desperately far behind.
Fox News, whose trusty team not a month ago could be found
banging away at CBS News (when its poll hit 34%) for "wildly
oversampl[ing] Democrats," now tells us that "for the first time under
70% of Republicans approve of the Bush presidency." As we all know, the
President has already lost the informal poll of generals and now, according to historian Sean Wilentz in Rolling Stone
magazine, he's lost the historians, too. Across the political spectrum,
Wilentz writes, historians are coming to agree that George Bush is the
worst president in U.S. history. ("No previous president appears to
have squandered the public's trust more than Bush has.") President
James Buchanan's shade can now rest easy.
Increasingly, the price of unleaded regular at the local gas pump (on average, $2.86; in California, $3) and the price of a barrel of crude oil ($75),
not to speak of the ever more disastrous situation in Iraq, the
unreconstructed New Orleans and Mississippi coasts, the ever-deepening
Plame case investigation, all those conservatives undergoing conversion experiences,
the range of government bureaucrats and intelligence officials leaking
up an angry storm as well as the former officials (as on 60 Minutes
tonight) spilling the beans about administration misdeeds, and too many
other disparate phenomena to name indicate that George and his pals
stand in the rubble of their project to dominate the American public and the world.
On March 10, 2003, diplomat John Brown wrote an open letter
to then-Secretary of State Colin Powell submitting his resignation in
protest against the onrushing invasion of Iraq. He wrote in part: "The
president has failed: To explain clearly why our brave men and women in
uniform should be ready to sacrifice their lives in a war on Iraq at
this time; to lay out the full ramifications of this war, including the
extent of innocent civilian casualties; to specify the economic costs
of the war for ordinary Americans; to clarify how the war would help
rid the world of terror; to take international public opinion against
the war into serious consideration." And he added that this
administration in its "unjustified use of force" was "giving birth to
an anti-American century."
Despite the millions then demonstrating worldwide, Brown was part of a rather lonely crowd in American officialdom. (Only three State Department officials resigned in protest.) But how on target he proved to be. Now, viewing that rubble, all those wasted lives, and the trillion-dollar
or more Afghan-Iraq wars, he writes directly to the President, calling
on him to take some responsibility for what he has wrought. Tom
On Waking Up Sleepless in the Middle of the Night
By John Brown
TO: The President
FROM: A former American diplomat
SUBJECT: Waking up in the middle of the night
Mr. President: Do you ever wake up in the middle of the night? Do you?
Do you ever wake up sleepless in the middle of the night?
What have you done in Iraq? Do you ever realize, in the middle of the night, what you've done? Do you?
1. You've caused over 2,370 American soldiers to die in an impoverished
land that never attacked us. Was that the right answer to 9/11 or the
"threat" from Iraq? Do you ever ask yourself that question?
2. Because of your Iraq invasion, thousands of U.S. enlisted personnel
are maimed, physically and mentally, for life. What can you tell these
victims of your war? That you're honored by their duty towards you, our
"mission-accomplished" commander-in-chief?
3. Your decision to go to war has led to the death of tens of thousands
of innocent Iraqis. Do you have any remorse for this, Mr. President? Or
was it that, for you, Iraqis only really deserved to serve as props in
"shock and awe" -- your name for your made-for-TV porno/violence
program at the beginning of the war, produced and distributed directly
into our living rooms by the mainstream media? (Thank you, Fox News.)
4. Will you ever, ever accept responsibility for making torture
all-American at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and elsewhere? And the Statue
of Liberty -- why, tell us why, did you allow it to be replaced by that
image of an abused, hooded, helpless prisoner on a box? Aren't you the
least bit concerned at how America is seen by the rest of the world
because of your war -- as a brutal aggressor nation, dismissive of the
opinions of mankind?
5. What about your mercenaries ("Pentagon contractors") that our tax
dollars pay for? Who are they? What are they doing in their
multi-thousands in Iraq, and to the Iraqis? Do you know? Or don't you
care to know?
6. You said you wanted to "rebuild" Iraq -- but isn't it true that all
you've really done is construct a Roman-Empire-style camp, a "Green
Zone" for Iraqi collaborators (whom you now mistrust) and U.S.
personnel in the heart of Baghdad that is an invitation to insurgent
mortars? Haven't you -- tell the truth -- destroyed in Iraq more than
you have built? Haven't you?
7. You say Iraqis now live in a land of "freedom" -- but what kind of
freedom? How can it ever be like the Four Freedoms of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt -- freedom of expression and worship, joined with freedom
from want and freedom from fear? As electricity fails and bombs terrify
citizens in Baghdad, where is the freedom you promised Iraqis, Mr.
President?
8. Your occupation of Iraq has led to a bloody sectarian conflict. Why
do you and your ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad now blame the Iraqis for
their problems? Don't you share responsibility for the desperate
situation they are in?
9. Your trillion-dollar binge of destruction in the cradle of
civilization -- who will pay for it? The widows of our soldiers? Our
young people, already too debt-burdened paying for their educations? Or
their baby-boomer parents who may see their pensions evaporate to
support your war?
10. Why can't you truthfully tell us, Mr. President, the reasons you
led America into war? Was it for the WMD, for regime change, for the
oil, for grand neocon visions, to avenge your father, to win elections
at home? What were your real intentions? Are you afraid to tell us? Or
is the truth that, deep down, you never really knew?
11. And, Mr. President, as you contemplate another war, this time
against Iran, won't you ever wake up in the middle of the night, and
stop more madness before it is too late?
John Brown, who writes regularly for Tomdispatch
and Tompaine.com, is a former diplomat who resigned from the State
Department over the planned war in Iraq, compiles the Public Diplomacy
Press Review, available free upon request at the site.
Copyright 2006 John Brown
|