July 7, 2006
One year ago, on the morning of July 7th 2005, someone detonated four carefully
placed bombs in London. Three exploded on London underground trains within
50 seconds of each other at 8.50
am, the first on the sub-surface eastbound Circle
Line, the second on the sub-surface westbound Circle
Line, a third on the deep-level underground southbound Piccadilly
Line. A fourth bomb exploded almost an
hour later at 9.47 am on the upper deck of a double decker bus in Tavistock
Fifty two innocent British civilians were killed, many of whom had already become
seriously disenchanted with the Blair government as evidenced by the massive
voter turnaway from the Labour party in the British general elections of March
Having intially believed that power
surges in the underground power grid had caused explosions in power circuits,
the British government quickly announced that this was a terrorist attack,
and identified four ' home-grown Islamic suicide bombers' from CC camera footage
of them allegedly entering Luton train station on the morning of July 7th.
Later on the same day, a claim of responsibility was made by a 'previously
unknown group' calling itself 'The Secret Cell of al-Qaida of Jihad in Europe'
and posted on an Islamic website. On teh same day, a letter dated June
20th allegedly from Osama bin Laden, was released wherein the al-Qaida leader
said that the London bombings were part of a wider al-Qaida summer offensive:
A translation of the letter stated:
"Rejoice for it is time to take revenge against the British Zionist Crusader
government in retaliation for the massacres Britain is committing in Iraq and
Afghanistan. The heroic mujahideen have carried out a blessed raid in London.
Britain is now burning with fear, terror and panic in its northern, southern,
eastern, and western quarters. We have repeatedly warned the British Government
and people. We have fulfilled our promise and carried out our blessed military
raid in Britain after our mujahideen exerted strenuous efforts over a long
period of time to ensure the success of the raid." etc. etc.
|Puppet on a String - 'al-Zawahiri'
Later in September 2005, alleged 'al-Qaeda' deputy leader 'Ayman al-Zawahri',
in a videotaped
message aired on Arab television station al-Jazeera, stated
for the first time that 'al-Qaeda' carried out the 7 July suicide bombings.
Interestingly, in the tape, the Mr Magoo of Islamic terrorism stated that the
plans to toughen the UK's anti-terror laws in the aftermath of the bombings
showed "the dreadful colonial face of Britain". As we have noted
in the past, it seems that 'al-qaeda' seems quite content to provide the British
government with the justification to institute draconian anti-terror laws while
at the same time criticising the British government for introducing those laws.
As mentioned, the claim of responsibility
made by the previously unknown 'Secret Cell of al-Qaida of Jihad in Europe'
was posted on an Islamic website. A little research turns up the following
report from the UK
Guardian which states:
"The claim of responsibility for the London attacks
was first posted on one of the dozens of Islamic websites that are routinely
monitored by western intelligence services.
The statement, under the name of the Secret Organisation of the al-Qaida
Jihad in Europe, said: "The heroic mujahideen have carried out a blessed
raid in London. Britain is now burning with fear, terror and panic in its
northern, southern, eastern and western quarters."
It was posted on an Arabic website, al-qal3ah.com, which is registered by
Qalaah Qalaah in Abu Dhabi and hosted by a server in Houston
The Houston company that owns the server has
intriguing connections. Everyone’s Internet was founded by brothers Robert
and Roy Marsh in 1998 and by 2002 had an income of more than $30m (now about £17m).
Renowned for his charitable work, Roy Marsh counts among his friends
President George Bush’s former sister-in-law, Sharon Bush, and the president’s
Despite these admissions of guilt by Islamic groups and 'al-Qaeda', in April
2006, the Observer newspaper published leaked details of the first draft of
a forthcoming Home Office report on the bombings, compiled for the then Home
Secretary Charles Clarke by a senior civil servant. On May 11th 2005, the Blair
government ruled out a full public inquiry into the attacks and instead released
a final "narrative" report. The report stated that the attack was
planned with a budget of just a few hundred pounds by four men
using information from the Internet. While they had visited Pakistan, it was
declared that, despire the claims of Osama and al-Zawahiri, there was no direct
support or planning by al-Qaeda and that meetings in Pakistan were "ideological,
rather than practical."
Sadly, the Balir government's final report failed to address many pertinent
details that pose serious questions about the accuracy of the official conclusions
about the perpetrators and the nature of the bombings:
High Street Chemist Or High Explosive?
The Blair government claimed that the bombs were crude home-made acetone peroxide-based
devices cobbled together on a 'shoestring' budget. However, on July 12th 2005,
the Times of London ran a report stating that "a lone bomb-maker using
high-grade military explosives is believed to be responsible for building
the four devices." The paper also reported that similar components from
the explosive devices have been found at all four bombing sites, leading detectives
to believe that each of the bombs was the work of one man using materials that "were
not home made but sophisticated military explosives, possibly smuggled into
Britain from the Balkans." The paper quotes Superintendent Christophe
Chaboud, the chief of the French anti-terrorist police, who is in London to
help Scotland Yard as saying "The nature of the explosives appears
to be military, which is very worrying."
Further confirming that the explosives used were not "home made" by
four teenagers, a report in July 2005 from German newspaper Bild am Sonntag
as quoted by Israeli daily 'Ynet
The terror attack in London last week may be tied to a suicide
bombing on Tel Aviv’s beachfront in April 2003, German newspaper Bild
am Sonntag reported Monday.
According to the paper, Mossad officials informed British security authorities
that the explosive material used in the Tel Aviv attack on Mike’s Place
pub was apparently also utilized to stage the series of bombings in London
After analyzing the explosive material
used in the Mike’s Place attack, the Mossad concluded it was produced
in China and later smuggled into Britain, the paper reports. The explosives
were apparently stashed by terrorists connected to al-Qaeda who were able
to evade raids by British security forces.
According to the newspaper, Mossad Chief Meir Dagan said the explosive
in question is very powerful, and "much more lethal than plastic explosives
and can be smuggled undetected due to its composition.
The Mossad was also able to determine the substance was developed
and produced at the Chinese ZDF arms factory, located about 65 kilometers
(about 40 miles) from Beijing, the paper reports.
As a general rule, two-bit terrorist organisations and British teenagers would
find it difficult to procure high-grade military explosives from Chinese arms
factories that generally confine their business to the world of international
arms deals between governments. It is certainly interesting that explosives
used in alleged "islamic terror attacks" in London and Israel are
being traced to arms factories in China, especially since the UK and Israel
both have long-standing
arms deals with China, which include such high-grade
These facts were ignored by the final British government report on the London
bombings, which maintains that the explosives used were manufactured
from materials "found in high-street chemists".
Amazingly, on the morning of July 7th 2005,a UK-based crisis management firm,
Visor Consultants, was running
terror drills that simulated bomb attacks at
the very same train stations as the actual bombings.
The managing director of Visor Consultants, Peter Power, an ex-Scotland Yard
anti-terror branch man, stated on ITN news on July 7th 2005:
POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running
an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous
bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning,
so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.
HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how
you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?
POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned
this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name
but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis
managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a
pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the
correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow
time to quick time thinking and so on.
Mr. Power refused to name the company that had employed his services to stage
the mock terror attack on London underground trains, however, the Visor website
states "our clients include one of the top seven companies in the USA
and key Departments of the UK Government."
Can it really be a mere coincidence that a crisis management company was running
a terror drill that simulated terrorist bombings on the very same London
underground trains and stations at the very same time as duplicate real bombings
were occurring? Should the fact that the very same coincidence occurred on
the morning of September 11th 2001 when FEMA was conducting a simulated bioterrorism
attack in New York raise any eyebrows?
What about the fact
that on the morning of September 11h 2001, officials at
the Chantilly, Va.-based National Reconnaissance Office had planned and was
running an exercise in which an errant aircraft crashed into one of its buildings?
The US government called this a "bizarre coincidence". What would
you call it? At what point does 'coincidence' become evidence of criminal activity?
On the morning of 9/11, with FEMA, oh so conviniently already on the ground
as the attacks occurred, a Mr. Richard Sheirer, in his capacity as Director
of the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management, was heavily involved in
overseeing the City’s rescue and recovery operations. On departing
the office of the Mayor of New York, Giuliani established Giuliani and Partners,a
company "dedicated to helping leaders solve critical strategic issues,
accelerate growth, and enhance the reputation and brand of their organizations
in the context of strongly held values", and other nonsensical business-speak.
The important point is that, as a close confidant, Giuliani took Mr Sheirer
with him, with Sheirer currently enjoying life as Vice President at Gilliani
and Partners. The 'bizarre coincidence' that I want to point out here is that
Sheirer, and the abovementioned Visor Consulting director Peter Power, are
quite well acquainted with each other and, as of Jan 2005, both were serving
on the advisory board of the Canadian
Centre for Emergency Preparedness and both Guiliani and Partners and Visor
Consulting specialise in security preparedness and mock terror drills.
Coincidences on top of coincidences! But it gets better.
Giuliani and Netanyahu On The Scene
Guess where Rudolf Giuliani just happened to be on the morning of July
7th 2005? Rudy was lounging at the Great Eastern hotel just a few yards from
Liverpool street station where one of the bombs went off. In the same Great
Eastern hotel where Giuliani was staying, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange just
happened to be hosting its economic conference. Guess who the keynote speaker
was? Israel's then Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The same guy who, when
asked by a news reporter on the afternoon of September 11th 2001 what
he thought of the 9/11 attacks, responded:
"It's very good... well, it's
not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy for Israel"
As it turned out, Netanyahu never arrived at the Great Eastern Hotel because,
as news reports in the days after July 7th informed us, Netanyahu had in fact
received a warning from the Israeli embassy, (by way of the British
Metropolitan police) that bombings were to occur and that he should stay in
his hotel in Mayfair. Again, the official British government report makes no
attempt to address how British police knew at least 6 minutes (probably longer)
in advance that the bombings were to occur when, 'officially', British authorities
were not even aware that they were dealing with bombs, believing that
the explosions were the result of a power surge, until the bus bombing one
hour after the first train explosion.
CC TV - Close Circuit Or Complete Codswollop?
According to the official government report, the bombers were identified by
CC TV images of them arriving at Luton railway station at 07:21 a.m. on
7 July (below)
Mail report from July 2005 recounted the eyewitness testimony of
a survivor of the bus bombing who claimed to have seen Hasib Hussain the alleged
BUS blast survivor Richard Jones yesterday revealed how he came face-to-face
with one of the London bombers. The Scots IT expert got off the doomed double-decker
just seconds before it was torn apart in an explosion that killed 13 passengers.
"This young guy kept diving into this bag or whatever he had in front
of his feet," he told The Associated Press.
He said the bomber was around 6ft tall, in his mid-twenties, clean-shaven
and smartly dressed. The man was wearing hipster-style fawn checked trousers,
with exposed designer underwear, and a matching jersey-style top. 'The pants
looked very expensive, they were white with a red band on top... He was standing with
his back to me downstairs at the driver's side, which is exactly where the
Hasib Hussain is seen on the extreme left in the above image as he entered
Luton railway station on July 7th, allegedly on his way to carry out the bus
Below, he is seen inside the train station:
Compare his clothing with the claims of the eyewitness who said he
saw him on the bus.
To date, these are the only images that the British police have released,
and they refuse to release further
CCTV footage which they claim shows the four 'bombers' emerging on to the concourse
at King's Cross where, according to the home office narrative report, they
are seen hugging and appear "euphoric".
In an amazing turn of luck, British police claimed that
they were able to salvage credit cards and documents from the scenes of the
bombings enabling them to quickly identify the bombers. Amid the carnage of
twisted metal and bloody body parts, it was claimed that credit cards and other
ID were recovered. Two weeks after the bombings, the Pakistani government,
for some reason, released a copy of a passport that they claimed belonged
to Hasib Hussain and which proved, British authorities
claimed, that Hussain (and his fellow bombers) had visited Karachi in Pakistan
on 15 July 2004, and that this constituted 'evidence' that they had undergone
'ideological training in Jihad'. However, as
reported by the BBC, the passport
actually belonged to a very much alive teenage boy living in High Wycombe,
north-west of London, also called Hasib Hussain. As the BBC report stated:
"evidence showing that all three of the London bombers of Pakistani descent
visited Pakistan last year has been thrown into doubt."
claims of miraculous discoveries of identification of terrorists are strangely
similar to the events of 9/11 and the incredible (literally) recovery in the
rubble of the WTC towers of a passport belonging to one
of the alleged 9/11 hijackers. We are also reminded of the BBC report that, at
least four of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were still alive.
The British government and Metropolitan police claim that the bombers boarded
the 7.40am Luton train for Kings Cross (from where it is claimed that they
boarded their respective 'bomb trains') The three 'bomb trains' left King's
cross station at 08:35, 08:42 and at 08:48.
However, as can be seen from the following
the 7.40 from Luton was cancelled, as was the 7.46, leaving the bombers with
no option but to take the 7.48, which arrived at King's Cross at 8.42, meaning
that two of the bombers would not have had enough time to board the trains
on which they allegedly detonated their bombs. Of course, the bombers, having
arrived at Luton at 7.21am could have taken the 7.24am or the 7.30am trains
to King's Cross, but the official Home Office Narrative Report insists that
they took the 7.40am. Again, no explanation for this problem has ever been
given by British authorities.
Thameslink Trains: Luton to Kings Cross on
7 July 2005
||Actual 7 July
1 or 3
||7.04 (On Time)
||7.40 (on time)
1 or 3
||7.08 (On Time)
||8.26 (30 mins late)
1 or 3
||7.21 (5 minutes late)
||8.19 (31 mins late)
1 or 3
||7.20 (On Time)
||8.15 (7 mins late)
1 or 3
||8.23 (23 mins late)
||7.42 (12 minutes late)
||8.39 (35 mins late)
||7.56 (8 mins late)
||8.42 (22 mins late)
Bombs That Suck?
Equally absent from the official British government narrative report on the
London bombings is any reference to a very disturbing eyewitness report from
Evening News from July 2005. Dancer Bruce Lait had just boarded
the train at Liverpool Street station on his way to the South Bank for a rehearsal
when an explosion occurred:
"We'd been on there for a minute at most and then something happened.
It was like a huge electricity surge which knocked us out and burst our eardrums.
[...] We were right in the carriage where the bomb was. I was knocked out.
I did not know what was going on."
He and Crystal (his dance partner) were helped out of the carriage. As they
made their way out, a policeman pointed out where the bomb had been.
"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb
was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train.
They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody
being where the bomb was, or any bag."
If someone would kindly explain to me how a bomb in a rucksack on the floor
of a train can cause the floor of the train to be blasted inwards, I would
truly appreciate it.
For The Love Of Terror
I have written
in the past about the counter-insurgency strategy currently
being employed by US and British military intelligence agencies in Iraq, where
covert attacks on the civilian population of Iraq are being carried out in
order to confuse and demoralise the Iraqi population, and the real insurgency
that they support, in an attempt to consolidate US government control over
the future of the Iraqi nation. It is my opinion that in the 9/11 attacks,
and the Madrid and London train bombings, we are witness to the very similar
counter-insurgency tactics, only this time they are being used against the
American, British, Spanish and wider European and world civilian population.
There is a very clear link between the American and Israeli
war in Iraq, Palestine and soon the wider Middle East, and the need for the
population of Europe and America to believe in the reality of the 'war on Islamic
terror'. The invasion and ongoing occupation of Iraq by American and British
forces is, after all, being pursued under the aegis of the very same 'war on
Islamic terror'. It is essential therefore for the populations of America and
Western Europe to continue to believe in the 'reality' of ' Islamic terrorism'
in order for the US, British and Israeli governments to continue to expand
their war of aggression in the Middle East and beyond. Given the absence of
any real worldwide Islamic terror threat, it has long been understood by these
governments that such a threat must be manufactured. In the 9/11, London, Madrid
and other alleged Islamic terror attacks, we have evidence of just such a campaign
of manufactured Islamic terrorism, and the glaring holes in the official accounts
of how and why those attacks occurred provides more than enough
evidence to support this thesis.
Forest Gate - Psychological Terror Op
On June 2nd 2006, 250 heavily armed British police descended on a house in
East London where, it was alleged, 'Muslim terrorists' were manufacturing chemical
weapons to unleash on innocent Londoners. During the raid, which has become
know as the 'Forest Gate Raid', one of two brothers living in the house was
shot and both were arrested. At a press conference after their release, the
brothers (aged 23 and 20) described
When Kahar heard the front door being smashed down, he assumed it was a
burglary and left his bedroom to come down stairs, where, at a distance of "two
or three feet",
a policeman opened fire without issuing a warning or identifying himself. "We
had eye contact and he shot me straight away," recalled Kahar. The bullet
entered his chest and exited through his shoulder, sparing his life by inches. "I
was begging him, 'Please, please, I can’t breathe,' and he just kicked
me in my face. He kept on saying, 'Shut the fuck up'.... one of the officers
slapped me on the face ... I thought that they’re going to either shoot
me again, or they’re going to start shooting my brother."
Koyair, the brother, was also sworn at and beaten. Their elderly mother
was dragged out in handcuffs. Their sister, Humeya Kalam, told the BBC, "I
heard doors being smashed, windows being broken. I woke up, opened my door
and saw a person dressed all in black, gun pointing towards me." Meanwhile,
the police raided the house next door, where the residents received similar
In what has become standard policy, the police attempted to smear
the two victims by claiming first that Kahar had
been shot after he had struggled with officers, then that he had actually been
shot by his brother during a scuffle, and then that a police officer had "accidentally" discharged
his gun as a result of wearing thick gloves. It was also stated that the brothers
had attended militant Islamist demonstrations and that Kahar's wound was superficial.
Not surprisingly, all of these were outright lies, and the two brothers were
entirely innocent, but even more shocking was the subsequent
the police informant who provided the information that led to the raid, was
an "utter incompetent" with an IQ of 69.
Mohammed Abu Bakr Mansha (22) is a friend of
the two brothers and had been imprisoned in January for possessing an old address
of a decorated British soldier. This was an operation that involved
250 heavily-armed and bio-suited officers in a pre-dawn raid on a London home.
Such operations are not sanctioned without meticulous planning, including,
in theory, rigorous checking to make sure that the 'target' is a genuine, or
likely to be genuine 'terrorist'. Are we to assume that the British 'securocrats'
that sanctioned this operation were unaware that, given that the informant
was a 22 year old incompetent idiot, any information he might offer
should have been treated with serious suspicion, especially if he
was being offered early release in exchange for any information on 'terrorists'
he could provide, meaning that there was a distinct possibility that the information
he provided was bogus, as indeed it turned out to be?
The obvious conclusion here is that the Forest Gate raid was given the
green light, not because any faith was placed in the 'tip
off' from the incompetent idiot, but rather because it would help to create
the 'reality', in the minds of the British population, that Islamic terrorism
is a real threat to the world and that the Blair government is justified in
introducing further draconian anti-terror laws. After all, if 250 heavily-armed
police are kicking in doors and shooting people, then there simply must be
a good and justifiable reason for it, right? Well, yes, there is a justifiable
reason for it, but it's not any justice that you or I would readily ascribe
to, unless of course we were deceived into doing so.
Candy From A Baby
|Incompetent half-wits - the FBI wants You For Islamic Terror Opportunities!
We are also reminded of the recent 'Miami
Seven' affair in the US, where an
undercover FBI agent, posing as an 'al-Qaeda' operative, approached a group
of apparently incompetent half-wits living in a warehouse in Florida. The
group's name is "the Sea of David' and far from having anything to do
with 'Islamic terrorism' they all claimed to be Christians who "trained through
the bible". In a perfect example of how agents of the US government are actively
attempting to manufacture Islamic terrorism, the undercover FBI agent:
the group and asked them if they wanted to join 'al-Qaeda'
'swore one of them in' as an 'al-Qaeda' member
offered them $50,000
provided them with army boots and a video camera
suggested that they might want to blow up some government buildings
suggested that they wanted to blow up the Sears tower
suggested to them that they wanted to wage "full ground war against the
identified that one of them knew what the Sears tower was and had actually
been to Chicago - once
All of this was trumpeted in the mainstream press as evidence of an "Islamic
terror cell" working out of Florida and planning attacks against the American
people. I kid you not, and not once was the most appropriate word used - entrapment
Jihad From Jail
|Manfactured Terrorist - 'al-Muhajir'
Arch ex-bogeyman and 'al-Qaeda in Iraq' leader al-Zarqawi was killed in a
June 2006 bombing of his safe-house in Iraq. Despite having two 500lb bombs
dropped on his head, a picture of his only slightly-blemished face was spread
around the world as proof that, not only is the 'war on terror' real, but the
US is actively fighting it. Immediately after al-Zarqawi's demise, a successor
was needed, so out popped 'Abu Hamza al-Muhajir' who, courtesy of one of
Osama's dubious tapes, was lauded as al-Zarqawi's successor and the man to
lead the jihad against the occupiers of Iraq. However, the US government hardly
had time to slap a $5 million bounty on his head before this newest bubble
of fake Islamic terror was unceremoniously
popped by an Egyptian lawyer who
declared that he had just recently visited 'al-Muhajir' in the Egyptian prison,
where he has been languishing for the past seven years.
Now, answer me a couple of
questions: Don't you think that 'Osama', if he is all that the US government
says he is, would have known that there was slight problem with the new leader
of his Jihadi forces in Iraq in prison in the form of him being locked up in
an Egyptian cell? Why then would he have announced
to the world, via one of his infamous and very suspicious tapes, that an Egyptian
jail bird was to spearhead Islamic terror in Iraq and around the world?
of it stinks folks, but we are dealing with a very particular odour here -
I'm getting Langley,
Stating The Obvious
The facts are clear: there is no such thing as Islamic terrorism in terms
of there being a world wide network of terrorists who want to "hurt civilised
people everywhere". Any such suggestions should be seen for the clear Nazi
party-style government propaganda that they are.
All of this may sound like a joke, albeit a rather sick one, that the US,
British and Israeli governments are perpetrating against the global population,
but make no mistake, from their point of view, this is no joke - the 200,000
Iraqi civilians and the growing number of Palestinian civilians that have been
butchered in the name of the 'war on Islamic terror' is a stark testimony to
It's time (again) to wake up and stop blithely swallowing government lies
and manipulations. Unnecessary and brutal war is being waged in your name and,
until now, with your support. How long the killing continues is entirely - 100% - up to you.