August 11, 2006
This article is available as a PDF
leaflet to download and distribute
The claim that American and British security forces have thwarted
a terrorist plot to blow up commercial flights between Britain
and the United States should not be accepted uncritically. It
is impossible to determine at this point whether or not such an
attack was in the offing, although the mass media have, as usual,
reported the assertions of the British and American governments
as indisputable fact, without bothering to ask for any specific
information that would substantiate the official story.
The British police statement that the alleged plotters aimed
to "create mass murder on an unimaginable scale" by
blowing up mid-flight an unspecified number of aircraft is chilling.
The far-reaching security measures that have been implemented—including
the shutdown of London’s Heathrow Airport and an indefinite
ban on carry-on luggage—add to the climate of fear and apprehension.
At a time such as this—in the midst of spectacular claims
from London and Washington, a media barrage supporting them, and
a massive disruption of commercial flights resulting from extreme
security measures—it is all the more imperative that people
not suspend their capacity for critical thought and political
Raids in the early hours of Thursday morning on homes and business
premises in London and the West Midlands resulted in 21 arrests.
Spokesmen for the US and British governments asserted that those
arrested were involved in the most significant terrorist plot
Later reports said that 24 people had been arrested in Britain
and more had been detained in Pakistan. Among those arrested were
a Muslim charity worker and a Heathrow Airport employee with an
all-area access pass, according to Britain’s Channel 4 News.
Five suspects in the plot are still at large, according to ABC
News, which cited US sources.
BBC News reported Thursday evening that the arrests were the
result of a long-standing investigation coordinated between the
US, British and Pakistani governments. British Home Secretary
John Reid in a press conference earlier on Thursday said Prime
Minister Tony Blair had briefed President George Bush on the impending
arrests and security measures over the weekend.
Subsequent reports claimed the plotters had planned to target
simultaneously up to ten aircraft from three US carriers by smuggling
onboard liquid chemical explosives disguised as beverages or electronic
US intelligence officials said the plotters hoped to stage
a "dry run" today (Friday) and the actual attack would
have followed days later. A senior congressional source claimed
the plotters planned to mix a sports drink with a peroxide-based
paste to make an "explosive cocktail" that could be
triggered by an MP3 player or cell phone.
President George Bush made a brief statement mid-day Thursday
that was calculated to heighten public anxieties and exploit the
alleged terror plot to justify the panoply of reactionary policies
his administration has pursued since 9/11 in the name of the "war
Speaking on an airport runway in Green Bay, Wisconsin, he said
that the thwarted plot was a "stark reminder that this nation
is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy
those of us who love freedom." He suggested that the plot
vindicated the measures—massive domestic spying, military
tribunals, detentions without trial—taken by his administration
to "protect the American people," and went on to warn
that "it is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the
United States of America."
The World Socialist Web Site has no information that
allows us to make a definitive judgement on the existence or non-existence
of a terrorist plot on the scale claimed. However, it is the responsibility
of the US and British governments to produce the facts that would
substantiate their allegations and justify the extreme security
measures they have taken, and to present these facts to the public
in a clear and concise manner.
They have produced no such factual account or substantiation.
Neither the White House nor Downing Street has any right to
expect people to accept their claims at face value, or place confidence
in any of their statements. The war against Iraq was legitimised
on the basis of false claims of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction
and ties between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda. These lies have
destroyed forever the credibility of Bush and Blair.
If it is true that such a heinous crime was being planned,
the responsibility for this ultimately rests with the policies
pursued by Washington and London. Ever since 9/11, both Bush and
Blair have employed the mantra of the "war on terror"
as a cover for their predatory war aims in the Middle East, immensely
intensifying anti-American and anti-British sentiment within the
Muslim world. At the same time, the "war on terror"
has been used domestically as the pretext for an unprecedented
assault on democratic rights.
Faced with a worsening debacle in Afghanistan and Iraq, and
massive international opposition to their support for Israel’s
devastation of Lebanon, both governments have an interest in perpetuating
an atmosphere of hysteria. Such a climate serves to intimidate
their opponents and justify ever more draconian measures at home
In point of fact, the official accounts in Britain of the alleged
terror plot lack any specific or verifiable facts and are remarkably
short on detail. The statements by American officials are no better
when it comes to serious substantiation. They are, however, more
detailed in their claims.
US Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told a televised
news conference that the plot was "a very sophisticated plan
and operation" and was close to fruition. "It was not
a circle with a handful of people sitting around and dreaming,’’
he said. "They had accumulated the capability necessary and
they were well on their way.’’
The plot appeared to have been aimed at US carriers flying
out of Heathrow, he continued. It was "international in scope"
and suggestive of Al Qaeda.
He did not give a specific date for the timing of the plan,
but said it may have been before the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
"I can’t tell you they had a particular date in mind,"
he said. "Nor can I tell you that they would have waited
that long. This was quite close to the execution date."
Chertoff offered no explanation of how security services knew
that a terror attack was imminent when they didn’t know the
target date for its execution.
This is by no means the only question mark hanging over official
Britain’s Home Secretary Reid gave the impression in his
press conference that the evidence prompting the arrests came
from the UK, and CNN reported that information gathered after
recent arrests in Pakistan convinced British investigators they
had to act urgently to stop the plot. However, Britain’s
Channel 4 reported that UK authorities had acted based on intelligence
provided by the CIA.
Moreover, if Blair was in discussions with Bush over the weekend
about an "imminent" terrorist attack, why did he still
leave for his holiday in Barbados on Tuesday? And given that the
plot is said to have targeted planes, why did the security services
allow him to do so?
And if the threat posed by the plot was considered dangerous
enough to warrant raising the terror alert in the UK from "severe"
to "critical" and to code red in the US, why were no
arrests made for five days? And why was the terror alert only
raised after the arrests were made and not before?
No such questions have been asked by the media. And yet recent
months have seen a number of alleged terrorist plots—in the
US, Canada and Australia—that were supposedly thwarted by
the security services. In each case, mass arrests were made of
people who, according to the indictments, had merely discussed
terrorist acts. No concrete plans were discovered, no weapons
or explosives seized. And in most of these cases, the supposed
plots were initiated and encouraged by government informers who
acted as agent provocateurs and entrapped the alleged conspirators.
In the case of July’s so-called "tunnel bomb"
plot in New York, the purported conspirators were foreign nationals
who had never set foot in the US.
As for the political utility of the current terror scare, it
should be noted that only hours before Thursday’s raids,
British Home Secretary Reid gave a major speech in London in which
he accused opponents of the government’s anti-democratic
legislation of undermining the "war on terror."
In the face of what he called "probably the most sustained
period of severe threat since the end of the second world war,"
Reid decried those who "don’t get it," blaming
them for the fact that "we remain unable to adapt our institutions
and legal orthodoxy as fast as we need to."
Making it clear that the required "adaptation" meant
the gutting of traditional democratic rights, he added: "Sometimes
we may have to modify some of our own freedoms in the short term
in order to prevent their misuse and abuse by those who oppose
our fundamental values and would destroy all of our freedoms in
the modern world."