Sunday January 01st 2006, 9:45 pm
Not only is the omnipresent "al-Qaeda" at work in Gaza (see previous post) but if we are to believe Reuters and the New York Times,
the custom-made (by the CIA and Pakistan’s ISI) terrorist outfit is
also busy at work in Lebanon, firing missile salvos into northern
Israel. "The lion sons of al Qaeda launched … a new attack on the
Jewish state by launching 10 missiles … from the Muslims’ lands in
Lebanon on selected targets in the north of the Jewish state," a
"statement" on a supposed "al-Qaeda" website claims. "The statement
could not be authenticated, but was posted on a main Web site
frequently used by Iraqi insurgent groups. It did not give the date of
the attack," Reuters adds. No explanation here why U.S. military
intelligence has not attacked or taken down a website run by "Iraqi
insurgent groups," unless of course this particular website is a
Pentagon black op.
Fortunately, at least somebody in Israel
is not buying the "al-Qaeda" in Lebanon fantasy. "For this to be true,
it would mean that al Qaeda, a virulently anti-Shi’ite group, has
penetrated the heartland of Hizbollah, a virulent Shi’ite group, on
such a scale that it can mount a rocket salvo independently… This claim
should be regarded with extreme skepticism," warns "Israeli security
sources," according to Reuters.
But never mind. Here in
America, where it is believed Muslims are all pressed out of the same
militant mold, the hare-brained idea is big news. "If the reports are
accurate, the attack on Israel may be a strong indication that Al-Qaeda
is expanding its terrorist activities and is continuing to establish
bases in countries friendly to its terrorist ideologies," speculates
the Conservative Voice.
In other words, Hezbollah, a Shi’ite organization initially formed to
kick Israeli invaders out of Lebanon, is "friendly to [al-CIA-duh]
terrorist ideologies," probably including the dead al-Zarqawi’s
declared jihad against "infidel" Shia Muslims, resulting in dozens of
suicide bombings in predominately Shia Iraq. Never mind this makes less
than absolutely no sense—as demonstrated, casual news readers in
America will buy just about anything when it comes to Islamic terrorism
(remember: Saddam was in cahoots with Osama on nine eleven, although
this preposterous idea is now losing credibility—after more than four
years—with the American people who are habitually slow to adopt reality
and are bereft of common sense, thanks to their dependence on the
corporate media, essentially a subsidiary of the CIA by way of
Operation Mockingbird and other diligent and long-standing mass
propaganda efforts).
It stands to reason, if we follow the
sort of convoluted logic offered by the Conservative (or neocon) Voice,
that Syria is a country friendly to "al-Qaeda" terrorist ideologies as
well. "Hizbullah has been using Russian-made RPG rockets purchased by
Syria to target Israel, outgoing IDF Intelligence Chief Aharon
Zeevi-Farkash charged," reports the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth. Meanwhile, Kommersant,
the Russian newspaper owned by fugitive Israeli citizen and criminal
oligarch Boris Abramovich Berezovsky, ran this accusation as gospel
truth with the headline "Israelis Hit by Russian Missiles."
CNN,
the one-time domain for the Pentagon’s Fourth Psychological Operations
Group, was not as blunt as the house organ for the Zionist Berezovsky.
"In what may be a sign that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s terror group is
expanding its operations, Al Qaeda in Iraq has posted a statement
claiming responsibility for firing missiles from Lebanon into northern
Israel earlier this week," CNN
reports. "It is not clear why Al Qaeda in Iraq—a Sunni Arab terror
group that has launched attacks against Shiite targets inside
Iraq—would be operating in southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah frequently
fires rockets across the border into Israel. Hezbollah has strong ties
with Iran, a Shiite country."
Indeed, it is not clear at
all—in fact the claim is absurd. But then so is the claim al-Zarqawi,
long ago documented as dead (and also said to be of sub-standard
intelligence when he was alive, not exactly the best candidate to run a
sprawling "insurgent" movement in Iraq), has expanded his fantastical
operation into Lebanon, regardless of the obviously insurmountable and
mind-boggling logistical nightmares associated with such a maneuver.
Of
course, it is plain as day why we are weathering these stupid and
admittedly baseless claims—because it is part of the neocon plan to
bombard us daily with a ceaseless stream of anti-Muslim propaganda in
preparation for attacks to come (and not necessarily invasions; as the
case with Syria demonstrates; the plan is isolate the country and
impose United Nations sanctions, ultimately—as the neocons and the
Jabotinksy Zionists would have it—resulting in the sort of society-wide
disaster that occurred in Iraq after more than a decade of murderous
sanctions, killing 500,000 Iraqi children).
As well, the
neocons and their Israeli taskmasters are working overtime to peg
legitimate resistance movements in Palestine and Lebanon as purveyors
of the sort of bloody serial murder attributed to "al-Qaeda," a largely
chimerical boogeyman. Of course, this plan is destined to fail because
people living under occupation—in Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon under
the unsuccessful Israeli occupation—will continue to resist as it is
basic human nature to resist such criminal depredation.