uruknet.info
  اوروكنت.إنفو
     
    informazione dal medio oriente
    information from middle east
    المعلومات من الشرق الأوسط

[ home page] | [ tutte le notizie/all news ] | [ download banner] | [ ultimo aggiornamento/last update 01/01/1970 01:00 ] 109741


english italiano

  [ Subscribe our newsletter!   -   Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter! ]  



Gaza: Where ‘humanitarians’ fall silent


September 14, 2014 -I strongly oppose Western-led wars launched in the name of humanitarianism. They exacerbate the pain of the populations they are supposedly trying to help without resolving underlying socio-political conflicts; indeed, they often make make those worse, as in Libya.The absurd inconsistency in the ideology of humanitarianism has been exposed in Syria, where, within a single year, Western powers have gone from being on the brink of bombing Syria in the name of protecting Syrians from the Bashar al-Assad government to bombing one of Assad’s main enemies, Islamic State militants.In regard to Gaza, what follows is therefore not an argument for a Western military intervention against Israel to protect Palestinians. That would be a bad idea because it wouldn’t address the core issues on which the conflict is based and it would in any case be an entirely quixotic exercise. However, a comparison of the way that Gaza has been discussed by advocates of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) since Israel launched Operation Protective Edge in July with the rhetoric of R2P proponents during the last case in which R2P was applied, the 2011 Libyan war, yields information useful for understanding both how the discourse of humanitarianism operates the attitudes of Western intellectual elites toward Palestinians....

[109741]



Uruknet on Alexa


End Gaza Siege
End Gaza Siege

>

:: Segnala Uruknet agli amici. Clicka qui.
:: Invite your friends to Uruknet. Click here.




:: Segnalaci un articolo
:: Tell us of an article






Gaza: Where ‘humanitarians’ fall silent

Gregory Shupak


Absence of Western demands to protect Gaza's citizens contrasts with outcry over Libya when conditions were far less distressing

September 14, 2014

I strongly oppose Western-led wars launched in the name of humanitarianism. They exacerbate the pain of the populations they are supposedly trying to help without resolving underlying socio-political conflicts; indeed, they often make make those worse, as in Libya.

The absurd inconsistency in the ideology of humanitarianism has been exposed in Syria, where, within a single year, Western powers have gone from being on the brink of bombing Syria in the name of protecting Syrians from the Bashar al-Assad government to bombing one of Assad’s main enemies, Islamic State militants.

In regard to Gaza, what follows is therefore not an argument for a Western military intervention against Israel to protect Palestinians. That would be a bad idea because it wouldn’t address the core issues on which the conflict is based and it would in any case be an entirely quixotic exercise. However, a comparison of the way that Gaza has been discussed by advocates of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) since Israel launched Operation Protective Edge in July with the rhetoric of R2P proponents during the last case in which R2P was applied, the 2011 Libyan war, yields information useful for understanding both how the discourse of humanitarianism operates the attitudes of Western intellectual elites toward Palestinians.

Israel’s 2014 attack on the Gaza Strip subjected the Strip’s residents to what is clearly a humanitarian disaster. When the war was at its peak, the UN estimated that 520,000 people "may be displaced, staying in emergency shelters or with host families", that 1.5 million Gazans who were not in shelters had "no or extremely restricted access to water", and that "Gaza’s medical services and facilities remain on the verge of collapse, with hospitals and clinics overwhelmed". Eleven day into the present ceasefire, a humanitarian emergency persists, as 450,000 Gazans "are unable to access municipal water due to infrastructure damage", while "Gaza’s health system suffers from chronic shortages in medicine, medical supplies and equipment and there have been limited training opportunities for staff". Meanwhile, "At least 373,000 children require direct and specialized psychosocial support" because "Children are showing symptoms of increasing distress, including bed wetting, clinging to parents and nightmares."

The UN reports, in a single sentence that captures the suffering inflicted by Israel, that "the entire population of Gaza has been affected by the conflict and almost all need food and other assistance to recover."

Moreover, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza preceded the 2014 war. The UN reports that before Israel launched Operation Protective Edge, the siege of Gaza had created a situation in which "around 66 percent of the population of Gaza was receiving food assistance" and 72 percent of households were considered food insecure or vulnerable to food insecurity. Unemployment was at 45 percent overall and 70 percent among people [aged] 20-24, while the "water and wastewater situation in Gaza was … critical".

Despite these conditions, virtually no advocates of R2P have invoked that principle for Gaza. Yet in the Libyan case, the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect called for strong international intervention on 22 February, 2011, including an arms embargo on the government of Muammar Gaddafi, sanctions, and the establishment of a no-fly zone over the entire country. As of 20 February, 2011, Human Rights Watch reported that the Libyan death toll was "at least 233", while on the same day Amnesty International put the figure at 100.

That’s not a trivial death toll but it’s worth noting that nothing in either organization’s document suggested that the Libyan government had engaged in aerial bombardment, attacked medical facilities or schools, or destroyed infrastructure and thousands of homes to the point that hundreds of thousands were either displaced or lacking access to water or some combination of these.

For the sake of comparison, consider that an article from 30 July, 2014, published by Simon Adams, the executive director of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect, does not call for anything like the type of intervention the centre advocated in Libya. In fact, it suggests that both sides in Israel-Palestine are at fault to a roughly comparable degree, a completely unsustainable position.

The humanitarian crisis in Gaza was plainly more acute at the time of Adams’ article than it was when his centre was calling for drastic military action in Libya. According a UN report issued two days before Adams’ article was published, 999 Gaza residents had been killed, including 760 civilians, 226 of whom were children. (Keep in mind also, when looking at casualty figures and assessing the severity of the respective crises, that Libya’s population is 6.15 million whereas Gaza’s is 1.8 million or less than one-third of Libya’s).

The UN document also points out that 215,000 Gazans were displaced, 22 medical facilities and 130 schools had been damaged, the "vast majority of the population" had reduced access to water, and on 26 July "313 tons of solid waste" had to be removed "from all areas of the Gaza Strip". No such conditions existed in Libya at the time the centre was calling for intervention in that country.

What the Gaza-Libya comparison points to is a convergence between the positions taken by R2P advocates and those who wield state power in Western nations. In Libya, the latter’s political-economic interests led the West to seek to replace Gaddafi with a more obedient ally, and R2P’s spokespersons legitimized intervention by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. By contrast, the West is a party to the horrors to which Gazans are subject, and R2P advocates have offered little in the way of concern for that tormented people.

The next time Western intellectuals advocate that their governments should make war to allegedly protect an at-risk population in the name of universal rights, the invocation of R2P needs to be regarded with profound scepticism and will likely need to be fiercely opposed by people who actually do care about peace and justice.

This article was originally published on Middle East Eye





:: Article nr. 109741 sent on 15-oct-2014 06:15 ECT

www.uruknet.info?p=109741



:: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website.

The section for the comments of our readers has been closed, because of many out-of-topics.
Now you can post your own comments into our Facebook page: www.facebook.com/uruknet





       
[ Printable version ] | [ Send it to a friend ]


[ Contatto/Contact ] | [ Home Page ] | [Tutte le notizie/All news ]







Uruknet on Twitter




:: RSS updated to 2.0

:: English
:: Italiano



:: Uruknet for your mobile phone:
www.uruknet.mobi


Uruknet on Facebook






:: Motore di ricerca / Search Engine


uruknet
the web



:: Immagini / Pictures


Initial
Middle




The newsletter archive




L'Impero si è fermato a Bahgdad, by Valeria Poletti


Modulo per ordini




subscribe

:: Newsletter

:: Comments


Haq Agency
Haq Agency - English

Haq Agency - Arabic


AMSI
AMSI - Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq - English

AMSI - Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq - Arabic




Font size
Carattere
1 2 3





:: All events








     

[ home page] | [ tutte le notizie/all news ] | [ download banner] | [ ultimo aggiornamento/last update 01/01/1970 01:00 ]




Uruknet receives daily many hacking attempts. To prevent this, we have 10 websites on 6 servers in different places. So, if the website is slow or it does not answer, you can recall one of the other web sites: www.uruknet.info www.uruknet.de www.uruknet.biz www.uruknet.org.uk www.uruknet.com www.uruknet.org - www.uruknet.it www.uruknet.eu www.uruknet.net www.uruknet.web.at.it




:: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
::  We always mention the author and link the original site and page of every article.
uruknet, uruklink, iraq, uruqlink, iraq, irak, irakeno, iraqui, uruk, uruqlink, saddam hussein, baghdad, mesopotamia, babilonia, uday, qusay, udai, qusai,hussein, feddayn, fedayn saddam, mujaheddin, mojahidin, tarek aziz, chalabi, iraqui, baath, ba'ht, Aljazira, aljazeera, Iraq, Saddam Hussein, Palestina, Sharon, Israele, Nasser, ahram, hayat, sharq awsat, iraqwar,irakwar All pictures

 

I nostri partner - Our Partners:


TEV S.r.l.

TEV S.r.l.: hosting

www.tev.it

Progetto Niz

niz: news management

www.niz.it

Digitbrand

digitbrand: ".it" domains

www.digitbrand.com

Worlwide Mirror Web-Sites:
www.uruknet.info (Main)
www.uruknet.com
www.uruknet.net
www.uruknet.org
www.uruknet.us (USA)
www.uruknet.su (Soviet Union)
www.uruknet.ru (Russia)
www.uruknet.it (Association)
www.uruknet.web.at.it
www.uruknet.biz
www.uruknet.mobi (For Mobile Phones)
www.uruknet.org.uk (UK)
www.uruknet.de (Germany)
www.uruknet.ir (Iran)
www.uruknet.eu (Europe)
wap.uruknet.info (For Mobile Phones)
rss.uruknet.info (For Rss Feeds)
www.uruknet.tel

Vat Number: IT-97475012153