September 5 2006
Another 9/11 family member has gone
public to rubbish the conspiracy theory that the attacks were planned
and executed by nineteen incompetent Arabs with box cutters who were
getting drunk in a strip club the night before
and barely
even made it to the airport on time. Meanwhile, hit pieces
against the 9/11 truth movement continue in the lead up to the fifth
anniversary of the event.
A familiar emotional shell game on
the part of the debunkers is to proclaim that questioning any aspect
of 9/11 disgraces the memory of the victims. This tactic is clearly
not working anymore especially in light of the fact that Bill Doyle,
representative of the largest group of 9/11 family members - says
that half now completely distrust the official version
of events.
Bob McIlvaine's son Bobby was working
for Merrill Lynch in the 103rd floor of the south tower when Flight
175 struck. He was likely one of the unfortunate individuals who obeyed
the Port Authority's ridiculous order for workers to stay in the building
and not evacuate even after Flight 11 had ploughed into the north tower.
McIlvaine is convinced that the attacks
were an inside job orchestrated by elements within the US government.
"Today, there are no ifs or buts
in my mind that this was an inside job. The US government orchestrated
it with the help of MI6 and Pakistan and Mossad. What they are telling
us is bullshit. The hijackers were patsies and Osama bin Laden was set
up," McIlvaine told the London
Independent.
McIlvaine has since devoted his life
to educating others on what really happened on 9/11.
Despite the best efforts of Jewish
American Adam Yehiye Gadahn to propagandize the reality
of the Al-Qaeda myth, Americans are becoming increasingly skeptical
of 9/11 and if the recent rash of hit pieces against the 9/11 truth
movement are anything to go by, the establishment is stricken with concern.
There were another two major 9/11
semi-debunking pieces over the weekend, one in the San
Francisco Chronicle and one in Reuters.
Expect a deluge of them for the next two weeks as the five year anniversary
comes to pass.
The most incongruous sentence from
the Chronicle piece is where CIA involvement in 9/11 is characterized
as "the epitome of preposterous beliefs that start with a conclusion
and work backward to find evidence."
Wasn't it media talking heads and
government officials in the hours after the attacks who were reading
off the same script and ascribing blame to Bin Laden with no substantiating
evidence? Did they then not present alleged "evidence" to
work backward to the already pre-determined conclusion? So-called
evidence that is insufficient
to federally indict Bin Laden for involvement in 9/11 five
years after the attack - despite the fact that it took less than three
months to indict him for the 1998 embassy bombings.
