Sunday July 24th 2005, 9:36 am
"Officials
believe the mastermind behind [the Sharm el-Sheik] attacks could be
linked to the attacks in October on resorts in the Sinai Peninsula
resorts. The deadly tally in those attacks that entailed three
explosions that destroyed hotels in Taba and two other Sinai resorts:
34 people, most of them Israelis," writes Joe Gandelman in a news round-up. It is said the Abdullah Azzam Brigades of al-Qaeda in Syria and Egypt claimed responsibility for the Taba and Ras Shitan bombings.
Abdullah
Azzam’s name rings a bell. A Palestinian university professor and
member of the CIA-penetrated Muslim Brotherhood, Azzam set up the
Services Office (Maktab al-Khadamat) a CIA- and Saudi-sponsored support
organization for the mujahideen (through Prince Turki of Saudi
intelligence) fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan, providing a network
infrastructure based in Peshawar, Pakistan, that would later form the
basis for al Qaeda, itself a CIA-ISI contrivance (see Gerecht, Atlantic
Monthly, July 2001).
In short, the Sharm el-Sheik operation
smells of CIA (in the current context, "CIA" translates into
cooperation between several intelligence agencies—CIA, U.S. and British
military intelligence, and Mossad—and "black" covert ops such as the
bombings at Sharm el-Sheik are entirely off the books and use
long-groomed assets such as al-Qaeda and other "Islamic terror" groups
spawned by the long-compromised Muslim Brotherhood).
Soon after the Sharm el-Sheik bombings, NATO secretary general Jaap de Hoop Scheffer
chimed in with an obligatory statement: the bombings "demonstrate that
people of all nations and of all faiths are victims of the
indiscriminate threat of terrorism. They also confirm the need for the
international community to stand together to defend against this
threat." It is, to say the least, disingenuous of NATO to make such a
proclamation, considering it provided financial and military support to
al-Qaeda in Kosovo and Bosnia (a well-documented fact although never
mentioned here in the United States—see Isabel Vincent, U.S. supported al-Qaeda cells during Balkan Wars).
In short, we should take note when a terrorist-funding organization
such as NATO issues statements in the wake of terrorist events. In
addition to funding and supporting al-Qaeda in the Balkans, NATO worked
closely with British intelligence agents and the CIA to create
Operation Gladio (the Italian variant of a wide-ranging series of
fascist, anti-communist covert paramilitaries)
As Daniele Ganser
writes, Gladio-like operations spanned across Europe and beyond: "…in
Belgium, the secret NATO army was code-named SDRA8, in Denmark Absalon,
in Germany TD BDJ, in Greece LOK, in Luxemburg Stay-Behind, in the
Netherlands I&O, in Norway ROC, in Portugal Aginter, in Switzerland
P26, in Turkey Counter-Guerrilla, and in Austria OWSGV. However, the
code names of the secret armies in France, Finland, Spain, and Sweden
remain unknown… In order to guarantee a solid anti-communist ideology
of its recruits, the CIA and MI6 generally relied on men of the
conservative political Right. At times, former Nazis and right-wing
terrorists were also recruited, and eventually these "right-wing
terrorists" engaged in bombings and assassinations subsequently blamed
on the left, part of a "strategy of tension" (from 1969 to 1974).
Ganser writes:
In this age of global concern about
terrorism, in which secret services are thought of as part of the
solution and not as part of the problem, it is greatly upsetting to
discover that Western Europe and the United States collaborated in
establishing secret armed networks which in the majority of countries
are suspected of having had links to acts of terrorism. In the United
States, such nations have been called rogue states and are the object
of hostility and sanction. Can it be that the United States itself,
potentially in alliance with Great Britain and other NATO members,
should be on the list of states sponsoring terrorism, together with
Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Iran? Or, alternatively, is it plausible to
assume the secret NATO armies operated for years beyond the control of
legitimate political authorities?
For Ms. Ganser,
this may be upsetting, but for many of us it is all too typical of the
way the fascist and neolib (and neocon faction) state does business.
Islamic terrorism, created in large part by the state (as amply
documented), is a new (or extended) Gladio black op on steroids.
"Throughout
history governments have used terrorism against their own people and
created paper tiger enemies as a means of obtaining and retaining the
trust of the masses in the process of gradually enslaving them," write Paul Joseph Watson and Alex Jones.
"The Anglo-American establishment that controls the military-industrial
complex of the West has been caught over a hundred times carrying out
bombings and other terrorist attacks around the world to further their
corporate aims and to blame their enemies… How many of the family
members of the London subway bombing victims are aware of the fact that
in a 2000 investigation the Italian Senate concluded that the 1980
Bologna train bombing [a Gladio op] that killed 85 people was carried
out by 'men inside Italian state institutions and … men linked to the
structures of United States intelligence’?"
It is impossible
to ignore (unless you get your news exclusively from Fox) the links
between Islamic terrorism and "structures of United States [and British
and Italian] intelligence." It makes absolutely no sense for "al-Qaeda"
(and its variants) to kill innocent civilians at Sharm el-Sheik or in
the subways of London—unless we are to presume, as the state and its
various corporate media propaganda ministries would have us believe,
that Muslims simply embrace an "evil ideology" and engage in senseless
and pointless violence without logical political objectives. It should
be obvious this violence benefits the United States and its
collaborators in a well-orchestrated effort to build a military and
police super-state (a "New World Order," for lack of a better term).
Sharm el-Sheik is but another step in a global strategy of tension (and
terror) designed to build a frightened and thus illogical consensus for
repressive police state tactics.